Back when I was a kid there was a theory that the strontium 90 in milk caused cancer. Haven't heard anything for years about that.
Back when I was a kid there was a theory that the strontium 90 in milk caused cancer. Haven't heard anything for years about that.
Strontium 90 can cause cancer...science refines. This is what today's theory looks like:
NRC: Backgrounder on Radiation Protection and the “Tooth Fairy” Issue
Well I think that gasoline should be looked at a little harder. I was in Oregon and California and there were fittings on the gas station fuel filler that removed the fumes. Most states and provinces don’t have that. So just think for a min. how much fuel fumes escape into the air. Secondly gasoline should not be handled period. Gasoline goes through your skin very easily. Governments hammer manufacture to produce clean running vehicles, but the oil companies let you spill it, handle it and breathe the fumes. But it seems we would not dare ask an oil company to be responsible with their product. Look at the product, there is no parts and service or the infrastructure to maintain, no warranty to pay and once used there is no recycling or waste disposal to pay for. I feel the oil companies should hire and train workers to pump gas safely. It would create a ton of jobs in a depressed marketplace
Cancer is a growth industry. All we're going to do about it is sell ribbons donate to cancer foundations and swallow expensive pills. It is a disease of the modern world.
that's right!..
if it is illegal to see Carcinogen products that cause cancer to people, how come Cigarettes are legal?
They have proven that they cause Cancer! they have Carcinogen products in them!
for all, the definition of Carcinogen is:
Carcinogen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
![]()
![]()
The hazard symbol for carcinogenic chemicals in the Globally Harmonized System.
A carcinogen is any substance, radionuclide or radiation, that is an agent directly involved in causing cancer. This may be due to the ability to damage the genome or to the disruption of cellular metabolic processes. Several radioactive substances are considered carcinogens, but their carcinogenic activity is attributed to the radiation, for example gamma rays and alpha particles, which they emit. Common examples of carcinogens are inhaled asbestos, certain dioxins, and tobacco smoke. Cancer is a disease in which damaged cells do not undergo programmed cell death. Carcinogens may increase the risk of cancer by altering cellular metabolism or damaging DNA directly in cells, which interferes with biological processes, and induces the uncontrolled, malignant division, ultimately leading to the formation of tumors. Usually DNA damage, if too severe to repair, leads to programmed cell death, but if the programmed cell death pathway is damaged, then the cell cannot prevent itself from becoming a cancer cell.
So how come Cigarettes are legal then?
why are they the only exception to the Law?
that's right!..
if it is illegal to see Carcinogen products that cause cancer to people, how come Cigarettes are legal?
They have proven that they cause Cancer! they have Carcinogen products in them!
for all, the definition of Carcinogen is:
Carcinogen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
![]()
![]()
The hazard symbol for carcinogenic chemicals in the Globally Harmonized System.
A carcinogen is any substance, radionuclide or radiation, that is an agent directly involved in causing cancer. This may be due to the ability to damage the genome or to the disruption of cellular metabolic processes. Several radioactive substances are considered carcinogens, but their carcinogenic activity is attributed to the radiation, for example gamma rays and alpha particles, which they emit. Common examples of carcinogens are inhaled asbestos, certain dioxins, and tobacco smoke. Cancer is a disease in which damaged cells do not undergo programmed cell death. Carcinogens may increase the risk of cancer by altering cellular metabolism or damaging DNA directly in cells, which interferes with biological processes, and induces the uncontrolled, malignant division, ultimately leading to the formation of tumors. Usually DNA damage, if too severe to repair, leads to programmed cell death, but if the programmed cell death pathway is damaged, then the cell cannot prevent itself from becoming a cancer cell.
So how come Cigarettes are legal then?
why are they the only exception to the Law?
Ban cigarettes totally ,lets move on
Over simplistic and would cost a fortune to police. It would just become another part of the war on drugs and we know that is a complete failure. Education is slow but it is working.Ban cigarettes totally ,lets move on
Over simplistic and would cost a fortune to police. It would just become another part of the war on drugs and we know that is a complete failure. Education is slow but it is working.
Me neither. Quit 5 years ago, except for a 3 month return to insanity last summer.Indeed, it is working..... I can honestly say that I am no longer smoking any tobacco products.......
....... in Canada.
Over simplistic and would cost a fortune to police. It would just become another part of the war on drugs and we know that is a complete failure. Education is slow but it is working.
Alcohol is all those and more but it is legal. I have a hard time with double standards.Yep, no use banning something you are not prepared to enforce. Cigarettes are evil as far as one aspect of life (health) goes, hard drugs are evil because they are a detriment to all aspects of life- health, crime, bad debt, family break down - the whole gamut.
Alcohol is all those and more but it is legal. I have a hard time with double standards.
That is only because they are illegal. If legalized they would be no more of a problem than alcohol. Most people don't realize that the majority of junkies are well fed, well paid professionals. We only get to see the street people who are poor and malnourished. It is a media scam. Crack heads and crystal meth addicts are another animal altogether.Yep, but the law abiding segment of society wouldn't go for it, alcohol has a detrimental effect on the minority, hard drugs on every segment of society.
That is only because they are illegal. If legalized they would be no more of a problem than alcohol. Most people don't realize that the majority of junkies are well fed, well paid professionals. We only get to see the street people who are poor and malnourished. It is a media scam. Crack heads and crystal meth addicts are another animal altogether.
Me neither. Quit 5 years ago, except for a 3 month return to insanity last summer.