Humans Are Changing the Climate 170x Faster Than Natural Forces

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,532
9,611
113
Washington DC
There is a pervasive idea that science is some sort of belief system.
There's a pervasive idea that a Great Big Invisible Sky Daddy loves you so much that he's going to take you to heaven and give you ice cream and candy forever unless you jerk off, in which case GBISD loves you so much he'll torture you forever.

So you can stick your pervasive idea. It's just argumentum ad populam.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
DOS you think flossy will subscribe to WSJ to read the whole article to find out why he is so wrong?

Not a chance.....
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
Humans Are Changing the Climate 170x Faster Than Natural Forces



A NEW EQUATION

Scientists have devised a new mathematical equation that allows them to determine just how much humans are affecting the climate. According to the researchers, global temperatures have decreased by an average of 0.01 Celsius per century over the last 7,000 years. This figure is what they considered the baseline rate. In the last 45 years however, trends show that it has increased at 1.7 Celsius per century, due to greenhouse gas emissions.

In the paper, published in the journal The Anthropocene Review, the researchers go on to explain that across billions of years, Earth’s climate has been dependent on astronomical and geophysical forces, as well as internal dynamics of the planet. In the equation, these natural forces tend to zero because of how slow they affect the Earth’s climate, in contrast to human activity. In short, while these factors still affect Earth’s climate, human activity overtakes it significantly. This change represents a climate shift driven by humans that is 170 times faster than those caused by natural forces.

“We are not saying the astronomical forces of our solar system or geological processes have disappeared, but in terms of their impact in such a short period of time they are now negligible compared with our own influence,” co-author of the paper Will Steffen said.

“While it would seem imprudent to ignore the huge body of evidence pointing to profound risks, it comes at a challenging time geopolitically, when both fact-based world views and even international cooperation are questioned. Nowhere has this been clearer than in the US in recent weeks,” adds co-author of the study Owen Gaffney.

GIVING PROOF

The relevance of this equation is two-fold. First it manages to clearly illustrate our current predicament. Attaching a specific number to demonstrate how much humans are affecting the climate in such a short time frame (in contrast to natural forces, which took millions and millions of years), clearly shows the impact we have on the environment.

“Crystallising this evidence in the form of a simple equation gives the current situation a clarity that the wealth of data often dilutes,” notes Steffen.

Second, it could also help drive action—given that we only have a small window to address the damage we have caused. As they explain in their paper, “the human magnitude of climate change looks more like a meteorite strike than a gradual change.” Earth may have shown remarkable resilience, but human societies aren’t likely to do as well.

Failure to reduce anthropological climate change could “trigger societal collapse”, their research concluded.

source



Pure bunk. Effluvium of the Radical Pagan Enviromental Religion, whose prime enemy is the human pestilence in their pristine eco utopia. Not at an ounce of scienfic merit; just blather, obfuscation and fear mongering all phrased in crypto scientific jargon to make it sound like they know what they're talking about.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,889
126
63
Humans Are Changing the Climate 170x Faster Than Natural Forces



A NEW EQUATION

Scientists have devised a new mathematical equation that allows them to determine just how much humans are affecting the climate. According to the researchers, global temperatures have decreased by an average of 0.01 Celsius per century over the last 7,000 years. This figure is what they considered the baseline rate. In the last 45 years however, trends show that it has increased at 1.7 Celsius per century, due to greenhouse gas emissions.

In the paper, published in the journal The Anthropocene Review, the researchers go on to explain that across billions of years, Earth’s climate has been dependent on astronomical and geophysical forces, as well as internal dynamics of the planet. In the equation, these natural forces tend to zero because of how slow they affect the Earth’s climate, in contrast to human activity. In short, while these factors still affect Earth’s climate, human activity overtakes it significantly. This change represents a climate shift driven by humans that is 170 times faster than those caused by natural forces.

“We are not saying the astronomical forces of our solar system or geological processes have disappeared, but in terms of their impact in such a short period of time they are now negligible compared with our own influence,” co-author of the paper Will Steffen said.

“While it would seem imprudent to ignore the huge body of evidence pointing to profound risks, it comes at a challenging time geopolitically, when both fact-based world views and even international cooperation are questioned. Nowhere has this been clearer than in the US in recent weeks,” adds co-author of the study Owen Gaffney.

GIVING PROOF

The relevance of this equation is two-fold. First it manages to clearly illustrate our current predicament. Attaching a specific number to demonstrate how much humans are affecting the climate in such a short time frame (in contrast to natural forces, which took millions and millions of years), clearly shows the impact we have on the environment.

“Crystallising this evidence in the form of a simple equation gives the current situation a clarity that the wealth of data often dilutes,” notes Steffen.

Second, it could also help drive action—given that we only have a small window to address the damage we have caused. As they explain in their paper, “the human magnitude of climate change looks more like a meteorite strike than a gradual change.” Earth may have shown remarkable resilience, but human societies aren’t likely to do as well.

Failure to reduce anthropological climate change could “trigger societal collapse”, their research concluded.

source
Utter crap and balderdash.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
There's a pervasive idea that a Great Big Invisible Sky Daddy loves you so much that he's going to take you to heaven and give you ice cream and candy forever unless you jerk off, in which case GBISD loves you so much he'll torture you forever.

So you can stick your pervasive idea. It's just argumentum ad populam.

I didn't say that I agreed with the idea, just that it is all over the place.

Anyway, anything that gives you an excuse to be snitty over your morning coffee like that is probably supplying a public service.
 

Jordyn

New Member
May 16, 2017
11
0
1
Fun Facts:
1)Carbon dioxide progressively loses the ability to absorb heat as its concentration increases.
2)Man-made warming theory relies on water vapor, not carbon dioxide, to drive future warming.
3)Cloud formation contradicts this water vapor feedback.
4)Climate scientists have never solved this cloud problem.
5)Solar activity in the 20th Century increased to its highest levels in at least 2,000 years.
6)Every previous warm period over the past few thousands of years coincided with strong solar output.