Most of us don't even qualify as being human.The conceit lies in assuming that humans are not part of "nature."
65,000km of oceanic trench expanding at an average rate of 1cm/yr would release how much heat into the oceans per year or in the last 45 years. When you get faster and slower rates of expansion that would affect climate on the surface? In years with no expansion would that relate to a cooler year on average.
When looking at an average rise or fall does it indicate 1/5 of the world got warmer by 10 deg and 4/5 of the world got colder by 3 deg so it was a global ice-age.
If the Pacific blob stays a hot spot it means that rift is expanding at a faster rather than it was, once started let's say it stayed that way for 1,000 years. In the 1st 100 years the west side would get head and the east side would get cooler winds from the north and @ 50 years the first year goes past where all the snow did not melt. That trend accelerated for another 100 years and the west stayed warm. Each 100 years that followed saw the snow migrate further west until a balance was reached. When the rift stopped expanding the water cooled down and the ice covered the land that had not been covered yet. The cold air coming off the ice would have caused warm rain to fall on the ice and that would have sped up the 400 ft rise in the level of the oceans.
If 100kg of 'flesh' needs so much energy to be alive then a dino that weighed 100,000kg should have needed 1000x more air, water and food.
The best example of global warming is not ever referenced as it show how minuscule out output has been compared to what the Siberian Trap put out as heat over the million of so years of constant eruption. The volume is know and the global temp change is 'noted' so it can be figured out much was released each year and compare that to current rates of certain gasses rising and causing changes on their own rather than they are signs of changes that already took place. Molten basalt into a solid would also have a rate of energy released into the air to do that. Over 1M (or so) the temp rose 5C so that is 1C every 100,000 years and there is no indication that the heat released back then is very much higher than it is if the oceanic rifts put out as many sq km per year. The numbers are there they just haven't been crunched yet.