Harper does not speak for me
- Thread starter Kathie Bondar
- Start date
Thank god he doesn't, no matter his policy or politics, if he was representing you I'd be worried we have a madman in power.
And America. And Mexico. And Australia. And....
Quit picking on Harper.
Basically I agree but you have to keep the bastard's feet to the fire, or he gets out of control. I don't personally see any problem with him giving the Jews a hand. They've had a pretty sh*tty go of it the past 100 years and they are some of the brightest and most talented people on the planet. If he was smart he'd import one of them to be Finance Minister. L.O.L.
As I understand it, the rule (at least according to the deniers here) is "If you stole it from somebody who stole it from the natives, it's OK," so I guess the U.S. is entitled to half of Mexico and Hawaii, and possibly the East Coast, having stolen that from the Brits.
I'm not sure about Canada. I haven't figured out if the rule applies if the first thief gave it to you, or only if you stole it by violence. Either way, y'all got Quebec free and clear.
Harper doesn't speak for me either .
Bringing up history of the Jews of ww2 does not justify the strangle hold they have over the Palestinians today.
I do not support either side when violence is the only solution they can come up with. That just adds to the vengeance list.
Bringing up history of the Jews of ww2 does not justify the strangle hold they have over the Palestinians today.
I do not support either side when violence is the only solution they can come up with. That just adds to the vengeance list.
Gee, that sounds great! Will you throw in three cases of fake dog poo?
No deal, Goobs. You think we just fell off the turnip truck?
Yes, I do. Heard it on the Rumor Net- Gotta be true.
And we can up the dog poo if needed. How much shxt do you really need?
What I can't seem to get my head around......
Is the possibility of the Shiny Pony Justin speaking for me......
There I'm giving myself ajust for acknowledging that possibility
Could be worse. ElliMay could be PM
Did that make your breakfast come back up?
Since parks are collateral, how much did we lend them? Nutlessyahud is running a big deficit and has only managed to land the 20% Soviet Gaz Prom deal while Palestine which Harper obvious recognizes as an independent entity is being lured by everybody under the Sun. If Jordan who is energy starved strikes a deal with Palestine the east bank will empty out to the West Bank. Petro Canada might be able to come in and pull off what Exxon Mobil can't. Getting Palestinian, Israeli and Lebanese gas to market.
In preparation of the promised eminent Israeli attack many nations have fortified their borders. Israel attacked the Egyptian air force on the ground with no provocation. Backstabbers and liars. Israel has no borders anyway, remember?
Where did it all start? Prior to 1945 there was no such a thing as Israel. Then at the end of WWII the west decided to settle the jews anywhere else but in Europe and Ibn Saud king of Saudi Arabia responded:
Desert King, P. 206 by David A. Howart
ON THE CREATION OF THE ISRAELI STATE AND ANNEXATION OF PALESTINE
On Palestine, Roosevelt made no impression at all. He told Ibn Saud of the horrors the Central European Jews suffered from the Germans, and asked him how he would suggest the survivors should be rehabilitated; and Ibn Saud, with Bedouin directness, proposed that the Jews should be given the choicest parts of Germany. When Roosevelt ventured to mention Palestine, Ibn Saud was adamant. Amends for a crime, he said, should be made by the criminal, not by the innocent bystanders; the Arabs had never injured the European Jews; it was the Germans who had taken their homes and lives, and it was the Germans who should pay. Roosevelt returned again and again to the point, until Ibn Saud grew impatient and said he was only an ignorant Bedouin who could not understand the President’s solicitude for Germans. Bedouin were kinder to friends then their enemies. Palestine, he added, was one of the smallest of the countries on the Allied side, and one of the poorest in land, and already had more than its share of refugees.
