Quebec government wants it both ways, they are dissatisfied with Canadian law, but when their own supreme court verdict is not satisfactory they go crying to the SCOC.............
Where, this time at lest, ther is no grounds for an application. They're tres hooped.Quebec government wants it both ways, they are dissatisfied with Canadian law, but when their own supreme court verdict is not satisfactory they go crying to the SCOC.............
FACT: Every two years more Americans die from firearm injuries than the total number of American soldiers killed during the 8-year Vietnam War. In 2003, the total number of people killed by guns in the United States was 30,136.
30,136. or very close, to a tenth of the total population of Canada
This post comes closer to the nub of the issue than the OP. The OP's comparison is unrealistic. American culture is inherently violent. Canada's is not. As to the issue that guns don't kill, that too is a cute, unrealistic play-on-words. It is the equivalent of saying that booze doesn't get people drunk, people get people drunk.
The Liberal gun bill was a bull**** property grab by elitist politicians and produced something that I had not seen in Canada before - mass civil disobedience. I am glad we disobeyed. We should have. OTOH should we have zero laws regulating guns? I used to think so but not any more. We regulate driving motor vehicles, so not regulating firearms makes no sense. The devil is in the details. America has mass amounts of gun laws, but because it is an inherently violent culture it also has a gun problem. Canada is not inherently violent and does not have a gun problem. We don't need a lot of gun regulation, especially not US type. However basic public safety rules don't necessarily offend me.
What offends me is the twisting and misleading police chiefs did on the gun registry. They told us that the gun registry must have been necessary because it was used so much. They don't say it was used so much because police procedure required it to be used even when no evidence suggested that it was necessary. Police chiefs must recognize that they are not elected leaders. They should not speak up from their official positions and attempt to influence political debate. We each get one vote plus are permitted to take private political positions. I don't want my cops using my tax dollars to tell politicians what laws to make. That is how police states work.
All IMO, of course.
Sounds good to me. Urban life is just as dangerous as it is for those who can open carry while working in the north dealing with bears and cats.In my perfect world, we would have firearms licenses with background checks
and safety training. Those licenses would be graduated, an A class for long
guns not semi-auto, a B class for all long guns, a C class for target handguns,
and a D class for civilian concealed carry, each class with its own regimen of
training.