Gun Control is Completely Useless.

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
3
36



Only an idiot progressive would think that restricting liberty for no purpose is "common sense".


Their murder rate is 0.54 per 100,000.


Why restrict guns?

why ask me?

They are the ones who voted for it - ask them.
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
The Swiss cut deals with the Fascists around them. So did the Swedes ... and the Irish Republic, for that matter. Swiss "neutrality" was tipped well in one direction.




LIAR....................................


get a good look at the TVO documentary on so called NEUTRAL Irish Republic............................


their security people had British military on the primitive early version of SPEED DIAL..............................


reporting every Nazi ship and plane they spotted moving around their coast............................................


or well out to sea................................................


And something like 30,000 Irish VOLUNTEERED for the British Army!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



And what DEAL could the Swiss have cut with Nazis????????????????????????


Did Nazis use Swiss SEA PORTS or something??????????????????????????????????


Why dont you TELL US THE DETAILS of the apparent betrayals you speak of??????????????????


Inquiring minds want to KNOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
But we'd only do that if we were stupid enough to think that the U.S. is Canada, and that Mexico is a religion.

And of us two, only one's that stupid.

But that's OK. I understand that your motivation is hatred of non-white people.




HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Oh Tecumsehbones for brains!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


When did you start SHARING that LSD with MHz??????????????????????????????????????


My objection is with people who want to DESTROY our democracy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Who want to BANKRUPT our country for grossly selfish reasons!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Who want to DESTROY our long standing alliances with Britain and United States!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


My objection is to people who TELL US LIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


About their TWISTED values!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Who tell us LIES about Muslim goals!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




Who think we should put our trust in proven BUTCHERS like Hamas and Hezzbollah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Who tell us LIES about national security issues!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Who think China is a TRUST WORTHY trading partner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Who think they are ABOVE the law!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And can EXCUSE MASSIVE BRIBERY by thieves at companies like Lavalin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I object to LIARS who IGNORE the testimony at the Charbonneau Inquiry that heard this:



"MULTIPLE ENGINEERING FIRMS WERE INVOLVED IN THE SAME BRIBERY AS LAVALIN" ....................................


and LIE-berals DO NOT CARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I am DISGUSTED by Socialist Swine who play fast and loose with the lives of people like Admiral Norman!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


And it is worth mentioning that LIE-beral Jean Chrerten PLAYED EXACTLY THE SAME career destroying games with the chief civil service whistle blower on the LIE-beral ADSCAM SCANDAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It is worth noting that LIE-berals arranged the SAME LIMITED INVESTIGATION into the Adscam as they have used to "investigate" Lavalin and Admiral Norman!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




POOR Tecumsehbonesforbrains....................................................


you must feel so very inadequate to have only name calling to refute HARD FACTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,481
5,845
113
Twin Moose Creek
Austria has a higher rate of gun ownership than Switzerland. It didn't stop the Nazis from running them over.
BTW the Swiss voted 64% to bring in the EU rules on auto and semi auto weapons.
Common sense.

Austria didn't try to stop them! Hell a lot of the Prussian Generals came from Austria

edit: Just to add so Hoid looks dumb https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austria–Germany_relations
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
Don't worry about Hoid/Waldo, all bluster and no substance...
Even his favorite invective of white natty is a farce....
look up the word "natty" on Google


It ain't no insult ......
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
3
36
Austria didn't try to stop them! Hell a lot of the Prussian Generals came from Austria

edit: Just to add so Hoid looks dumb https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austria–Germany_relations
Clompy said the nazis were afraid to attack Switzerland because of all the guns there.

I mentioned that they invaded Austria who have even more more guns.

I don't think you are quite following what is being said..
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
One thing I could see would be self-exclusion from gun ownership. Even if a person has no criminal record and no recognized mental illness but he personally thinks he might pose a threat, he should be able to self-exclude himself from the right to knowingly buy, own, possess, carry, or use a firearm unless essential for a period of five years under threat of a heavy fine, with the option of having the self-exclusion auto-renew every five years until he puts a stop to it, and require any seller to check each buyer's status.

Just because he has no criminal record and no known mental illness does not mean that he does not pose a threat to self or others. For example, he himself might know of a mental contition that he believes could make him dangerous even if it's not immediately obvious to anyone else.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Most people are already self-excluded from gun owership

I'm not aware of that. I own no firearm and have no interest in owning one either, but I can't imagine that I'd face much of an obstacle in obtaining one. I have no criminal record, no known mental illness, and could just say that I like to hunt. I get my license and then a weapon and off to hunt I go.

Now let's say I knew that I was having compulsive murder fantacies and was increasingly worried that I might feel tempted to buy a firearm, but no one else knows about this, given that I have no criminal record and no known mental illness, what would stop me from obtaining one if I say the right things if I suddenly feel an urge to kill? I'd assume that even potential murderers might have periods of sanity between their bouts of rage, when they are thinking clearly and recognize that one day they could cross the line. Would such a person, during his period of sanity, have any way to formally self-exclude himself so as to prevent himsel from buying a weapon during a period of rage for example?