Green ‘drivel’ exposed 0 The godfather of global warming lowers the boom on climate

G

Gilgamesh

Council Member
Nov 15, 2014
1,112
63
48
cabbagesandking said:
there are no sides in this and, therefore, no middle. There is the theory agreed to by all researching climate scientists, supported by their models and, now, conformed by observation. They also have the immutable laws of physics in support.

The other side consists of a few rogue scientists who are all paid frauds since they have no research to support their "scepticism." there are certain moneyed interests. And there are madmen like stephen harper. That is all and it is not a side.

The evidence is incontrovertible. It is as solid as that our system is heliocentric and the deniers are like the papacy of galileo. They know, as did the church, that they are wrong but, for political reasons, money, or for control of the masses, they refuse to allow the truth to come out unsullied.

The heartland institute as referenced in one of the pieces above, is entirely fossil fuel financed in its denials. The conference referred to was once written about by climate scientists as, "what if a scientific conference is held and no scientists come." that was it. Not a single scientist with any research attended.

And, a no-no in science. Theu paid any scientist who would give a talk $10,000 to do so. If you were following eents, you wouod know that the heartland institute is now on the ropes as mucyh of its funding has been withdrawn with the revelations by glieck of its fraudulent practises.
Click to expand...
you are insane

Gilgamesh said:
you are insane
Click to expand...
1600's. Also mid 1950's.

Any more moronic questions?
 
Dixie Cup

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,283
4,001
113
Edmonton
Huh - interesting conversations. Seems to me I heard that a lot of the IPCC scientists have now admitted that their predictions were incorrect and based on false assumptions and some (maybe even most) are now even backtracking on whether climate change is anthropological as they are unable to unequivocally prove that it's human caused.


Who knew?


JMHO
 
taxslave

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
Dixie Cup said:
Huh - interesting conversations. Seems to me I heard that a lot of the IPCC scientists have now admitted that their predictions were incorrect and based on false assumptions and some (maybe even most) are now even backtracking on whether climate change is anthropological as they are unable to unequivocally prove that it's human caused.


Who knew?


JMHO
Click to expand...

Everyone except floosy and hoid.
 
DaSleeper

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Six year old thread.................
 
EagleSmack

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
It is fun to see these old threads.

Even 6 years ago there was such hope and vigor about the religion of Global Warming.

Now the alarmists wallow in misery.
 
DaSleeper

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
I've always been against Pollution.....air .....water....etc. and for conservation....
But the global warming wienies, taken in by a taxation scheme are actually, doing more harm than good!
 
petros

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,209
14,249
113
Low Earth Orbit
Big oil is behind it. Big oil is Big Natural gas and NG is the backbone of reducing emissions.

Why should they pay for building a distribution network when the masses are stupid enough to pay for it and feel good about themselves?
 
Last edited:
EagleSmack

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
DaSleeper said:
I've always been against Pollution.....air .....water....etc. and for conservation....
But the global warming wienies, taken in by a taxation scheme are actually, doing more harm than good!
Click to expand...

And there will be Zero Effect on the Climate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom