Yes, I understand the frustration. I feel it too when people try to separate the church from the behaviour of the people in it, as if the two were not connected.
I have read this a few times and it appears to be all encompassing?
Yes, I understand the frustration. I feel it too when people try to separate the church from the behaviour of the people in it, as if the two were not connected.
Oh, YOU'RE telling me the answer isn't to go adding to the problem, when you yourself do the exact same thing you say I shouldn't be doing?
Way to be, hypocrite. :roll:
And why should I start a "Are you happy with Islam yet?" thread when I'm not happy with, nor defending, any religion? :?
We have a number of Members that have a Religious belief. Yet it is evident that those that do not have little to no tolerance for those that do.
They actively haunt those threads about religion and offer the same crap they always do.
That in itself speaks volumes about their belief in tolerance.
They demonstrate the same intolerance that they condemn.
Then they have the audacity to condemn others for not being quite so tolerant as they think they should be.
They are rather confused I would say. And I am being polite when I say that.
That argument doesn't work either, atheism isn't an institution or an organization, it doesn't have rules or dogmas or buildings or a hierarchy with leaders who presume to speak for everybody and tell them how to behave or what to think. It's not even really a thing, it's just a philosophical position--no different in this sense from other philosophical positions, like being a stoic or an epicure or an empiricist or a logical positivist or a Platonist--characterized mainly by the absence of a certain thing, a belief in deities. Quite apart from that,considering how religions have treated heretics and unbelievers for most of history, it seems a bit thick to me when the religious complain about mere verbal challenges to their beliefs.Or atheism from the behaviour of atheists...
To the extent that I find people who've renounced the use of logic and reason frustrating, yes.I have read this a few times and it appears to be all encompassing?
That argument doesn't work either, atheism isn't an institution or an organization, it doesn't have rules or dogmas or buildings or a hierarchy with leaders....
Or atheism from the behaviour of atheists... like you see talloola try to do. 'Real atheists don't....'
The key to having any humane belief set, is recognizing that it's prone to having humans in it.
Granted, but the discussion was about religion, which certainly does, not theism. And yes, I know there are loose-knit organizations that promote atheism, I don't belong to any of them (and wouldn't) and most atheists don't, and I think Brights is an aggressively stupid thing to label yourself with. But I also think that religion's history of persecuting, often fatally, those who challenged its claims leaves it with no legitimate grounds for complaint against people doing it in these less repressive times, however aggressive and azzholey they might be about it. If it can't or won't defend its claims against skeptical challenges, then it's a pale and watery thing that doesn't deserve to survive. And it DOES need to be challenged, it had things its all its own way for far too long.Neither does theism.
Granted, but the discussion was about religion, which certainly does, not theism.
Compare what, the Brights and atheist groups on FB to organized religion? That's not apples and apples.
The older I get, the more I think people in general suck regardless of what they profess to believe. Many people also excel at kindness and selfless acts that make the world a wonderful place to be, regardless of what they believe.
I broke away from mainstream religion because it did not make sense to me. I don't care what people think about that. I have always walked to the beat of my own drum.
I have a strange self-concocted spiritual belief system. So far, I believe I am a better person because of it. I judge that by how I treat others on a daily basis in all parts of my life real time and internet time, and whether or not my beliefs give me comfort and peace and the ability to "help" myself and others in my circle to be the best they can be for where they are at.
When I put out negative I draw negative.
I believe my behaviour is a direct manifestation of my belief system. If my behaviour is bad, something is wrong and I need to reflect upon that and adjust it. I believe the world functions best when we are responsible for every thought we have and every action we perform.
Granted, but the discussion was about religion, which certainly does, not theism. And yes, I know there are loose-knit organizations that promote atheism, I don't belong to any of them (and wouldn't) and most atheists don't, and I think Brights is an aggressively stupid thing to label yourself with. But I also think that religion's history of persecuting, often fatally, those who challenged its claims leaves it with no legitimate grounds for complaint against people doing it in these less repressive times, however aggressive and azzholey they might be about it. If it can't or won't defend its claims against skeptical challenges, then it's a pale and watery thing that doesn't deserve to survive. And it DOES need to be challenged, it had things its all its own way for far too long.
I've generally understood that religion and theism are the same thing...............belief in a supreme being.
This thread parallels the "Fed up with Islam yet? " thread which has hundreds of comments aimed specifically at denigrating its billion or so adherents by pointing out the strife in the Middle East and Central Asia. These comments are made in the same general tone that comments in European Christendom were made against the Jewish peoples. Of course, through our accident of birth, we "know" that Islam is "false" and Christianity is "true."
This thread does not aim at Christianity, but apparently at "religion" in general. But many feel threatened in the same way, I suppose, Moslems would, reading the other thread. I am certain, those objecting here will go to the "Islam" thread to raise identical objections there.
Many?
They could hardly do worse, there's no place to go but up, but being the same sort of flawed humans as anyone else they could certainly do just as badly....do you think they'll do better or worse in the world than religion has thus far?
Yes - In my opinion. I and others have dropped in and made posts. But I did decide to stay away as some are condemning the religion and all Muslims.
Just as you have some that are Anti israel- jew- You will have the same mind set for Muslims.
Can some of the fault be laid at Muslims doorstep. To be fair - yes
I also brought up reformation. Your thoughts on that?