Why Satanists? Could be Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Muzzies, but not many had a king that wrangled demons and has been emulated ever since.
I think you mean the Paulianity crowd, no?Why Satanists? Could be Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Muzzies, but not many had a king that wrangled demons and has been emulated ever since.
Nope I'm talking about the "seperatists".I think you mean the Paulianity crowd, no?
Why Satanists? Could be Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Muzzies, but not many had a king that wrangled demons and has been emulated ever since.
Bjork is a contemporary Icelandic musician and composer. She is out there a little and has a strong Icelandic accent...WTF is a Bjork?
We have already refuted all that bullsh*t several times so I won't bother re-posting those refutations again.
Still, it is the USA that killed over 1 million Iraqis, killed thousands more in Afghanistan, made all kinds of threats against Iran, supported a tyrannical butcher in Uzbek, and exported more terrorism than any other country in modern history. You and others of your ilk have side stepped those truths. Therefore, if you want your ''principles'' to be respected you need to apply them on a consistent basis.
More Nato stupidity..
Here's something to chew on for those who are a bit confused about who the really enemies are here..
Hamas resists Israel’s military occupation and its illegal and violent actions in the occupied territories. It is accused of refusing to recognize Israel (political parties do not recognize states). In contrast, the US and Israel not only do not recognize Palestine, but have been acting for decades to ensure that it can never come into existence in any meaningful form; the governing party in Israel, in its 1999 campaign platform, bars the existence of any Palestinian state.
Hamas is charged with rocketing Israeli settlements on the border, criminal acts no doubt, though a fraction of Israel’s violence in Gaza, let alone elsewhere. It is important to bear in mind, in this connection, that the US and Israel know exactly how to terminate the terror that they deplore with such passion. Israel officially concedes that there were no Hamas rockets as long as Israel partially observed a truce with Hamas in 2008. Israel rejected Hamas’s offer to renew the truce, preferring to launch the murderous and destructive Operation Cast Lead against Gaza in December 2008, with full US backing, an exploit of murderous aggression without the slightest credible pretext on either legal or moral grounds.
The model for democracy in the Muslim world, despite serious flaws, is Turkey, which has relatively free elections, and has also been subject to harsh criticism in the US. The most extreme case was when the government followed the position of 95% of the population and refused to join in the invasion of Iraq, eliciting harsh condemnation from Washington for its failure to comprehend how a democratic government should behave: under our concept of democracy, the voice of the Master determines policy, not the near-unanimous voice of the population.
The Obama administration was once again incensed when Turkey joined with Brazil in arranging a deal with Iran to restrict its enrichment of uranium. Obama had praised the initiative in a letter to Brazil’s president Lula da Silva, apparently on the assumption that it would fail and provide a propaganda weapon against Iran. When it succeeded, the US was furious, and quickly undermined it by ramming through a Security Council resolution with new sanctions against Iran that were so meaningless that China cheerfully joined at once – recognizing that at most the sanctions would impede Western interests in competing with China for Iran’s resources. Once again, Washington acted forthrightly to ensure that others would not interfere with US control of the region.
ZCommunications | The Iranian Threat
why spend a million on a cruise missile, when you can spend tens of millions on an ICBM.
Speaking of nukes...
US embassy cables: US targets terrorists with conventional warheads fitted to nuclear weapons
James Miller, a senior nuclear policy official in the US State Department, is giving a private briefing to NATO allies on developments in US nuclear policy. One of the subjects under discussion was the US plan to load conventional warheads onto strategic nuclear weapons to hit terrorists.
US embassy cables: US targets terrorists with conventional warheads fitted to nuclear weapons | World news | The Guardian
why spend a million on a cruise missile, when you can spend tens of millions on an ICBM.
Goober notes