Donald Trump Announces 2016 White House Bid

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,290
113
Trump stands by his own platform as Musk takes over Twitter
Twitter banned former president after his supporters' deadly attack on U.S. Capitol

Author of the article:Reuters
Reuters
Publishing date:Oct 28, 2022 • 18 hours ago • 1 minute read • 18 Comments

WASHINGTON — Donald Trump on Friday said he plans to make use of his own Truth Social media platform despite Twitter Inc’s takeover by billionaire Elon Musk, who has promised to reinstate the former U.S. president’s Twitter account.


“I like Elon, but I’m staying on Truth,” Trump told Fox News in an interview without explicitly saying he would not post on Twitter if his account is reinstated.


When he posts on his own platform, “it goes all over the place anyway,” Trump told Fox. “Everyone who is on Twitter and on all the other places, they all put it out anyway.”

Twitter banned Trump after his supporters’ deadly Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Musk has previously said he would reinstate Trump’s account, but Trump then said he would not return.


Musk, a self-described free speech absolutist, took over Twitter with brutal efficiency on Thursday, firing top executives but offering little clarity over how he will achieve his ambitious goals for the influential social media platform.

Mere hours after Musk kicked off a new era at Twitter, he was deluged with pleas and demands from banned account holders and world leaders.

Earlier, in a statement on his own platform, Trump said he was happy Twitter was in “sane hands” after Musk took over, but did not say whether he would return to his account on the platform that banned him.

Trump added that he thought his own platform “looks and works better,” writing: “I LOVE TRUTH.”

Others whose Twitter accounts were suspended have had or could have them reinstated soon.
1667051657570.png
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,290
113
Trump assails judge in N.Y. fraud lawsuit
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Michael R. Sisak
Publishing date:Oct 28, 2022 • 17 hours ago • 3 minute read • 27 Comments

NEW YORK — Donald Trump is lashing out at the judge handling the New York attorney general’s fraud lawsuit against him and his company, calling him “vicious, biased, and mean” in a social media post just days before the case’s first court hearing.


The former president, who has been on the losing side of Judge Arthur Engoron’s rulings in the past, coupled Friday’s criticism with complaints that — as a politician — he shouldn’t be forced to deal with legal action until after the midterm elections on Nov. 8.


In a separate case, opening statements are set for Monday in the Trump Organization’s criminal tax fraud trial following the completion of jury selection on Friday.

Trump, who has been laying groundwork for a possible comeback run for president in 2024, grumbled in a post on his Truth Social platform about having to deal with simultaneous court action on the eve of an election that could put Republicans back in control of one or both houses of Congress.

“In breaking with a long standing and powerful tradition where cases involving politicos are not to be brought or tried just prior to, or during, a major Election (the Midterms), I have THREE, all run and inspired by Democrats, who absolutely refused to move the date,” Trump wrote. “They demanded it be now. So much for tradition and unwritten rules and laws!!!”


There are currently three active cases involving Trump or the Trump Organization in New York courts.

The company’s criminal tax fraud trial, which involves allegations that senior executives received off-the-books compensation, could last into December. Six alternate jurors were picked Friday to complete the panel needed for the trial.

On Monday, jury selection is scheduled to begin in the Bronx in a civil lawsuit brought by protesters who say they were roughed up by Trump’s security guards.

Trump’s outburst about Engoron came in the third case, a civil lawsuit filed by Attorney General Letitia James, after an administrative judge refused Tuesday to have the matter reassigned to another judge.


Engoron, a Democrat, repeatedly had ruled against Trump in disputes over subpoenas, holding him in contempt and fining him $110,000 for being slow to turn over documents and forcing him to sit for a deposition — testimony in which Trump invoked his Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination more than 400 times.

On Truth Social, Trump said the only person worse than James was Engoron.

“His name is Arthur Engoron & he is a vicious, biased, and mean ‘rubber stamp’ for the Communist takeover of the great & prosperous American company that I have built over a long period of years,” Trump wrote.

A court spokesperson said Engoron, a judge since 2003, had no comment.

James’ lawsuit, the product of a three-year investigation into Trump’s business practices, alleges that he and the Trump Organization inflated his net worth by billions of dollars and misled banks and others for years about the value of assets, including golf courses, hotels and his Mar-a-Lago estate.


James, a Democrat, is seeking $250 million and a permanent ban on Trump, a Republican, doing business in the state.

At a hearing scheduled for Thursday, Engoron will weigh James’ request for an independent monitor to oversee the Trump Organization’s activities after she alleged the company was taking steps to dodge potential penalties, such as incorporating a new entity named Trump Organization II.

At the same time, the FBI is continuing to investigate Trump’s storage of sensitive government documents at Mar-a-Lago, a special grand jury in Georgia is investigating whether Trump or others attempted to influence state election officials and, last week, the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection issued a subpoena to Trump.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,290
113
Trump's company 'cheated' tax authorities, prosecutor says at trial
Author of the article:Reuters
Reuters
Karen Freifeld and Luc Cohen
Publishing date:Oct 31, 2022 • 19 hours ago • 4 minute read • 6 Comments
Attorney Michael van der Veen makes opening statements during the Trump Organization's criminal tax trial in Manhattan Criminal Court, New York City, U.S., October 31, 2022 in this courtroom sketch.
Attorney Michael van der Veen makes opening statements during the Trump Organization's criminal tax trial in Manhattan Criminal Court, New York City, U.S., October 31, 2022 in this courtroom sketch. PHOTO BY JANE ROSENBERG /REUTERS
NEW YORK — Former President Donald Trump’s real estate company cheated tax authorities for 15 years, a prosecutor said on Monday in her opening statement in the Trump Organization’s criminal tax fraud trial, while defense lawyers said the company’s longtime chief financial officer was only acting on his own behalf.


The company paid certain executives – including CFO Allen Weisselberg – in perks such as rent and car leases without reporting those benefits to tax authorities, and falsely reported bonuses as non-employee compensation, said Susan Hoffinger, a prosecutor with the Manhattan district attorney’s office.


The case is among the mounting legal troubles facing the 76-year-old Trump as he considers another bid for the presidency after losing in 2020.

Weisselberg, who has worked for Trump for nearly half a century, in August pleaded guilty and agreed to testify as a prosecution witness at trial as part of a plea agreement for him to receive a sentence of five months in jail.

Lawyers for the two Trump Organization units argued Weisselberg cheated on taxes to benefit himself, not the company. Both the Trump Corporation and the Trump Payroll Corporation have pleaded not guilty. Trump has not been charged in the case.


“Weisselberg did it for Weisselberg,” Michael Van Der Veen, a lawyer for the Trump Payroll Corporation, said in his opening statement. “Greed made him cheat on his taxes, hide his deeds from his employer, and betray the trust built over nearly 50 years.”

Hoffinger said Weisselberg was “a prime beneficiary” of the scheme. But she said he acted in his official capacity as a Trump Organization executive, and that the company also benefited by keeping top executives happy and saving on some taxes.

“Everybody wins here,” Hoffinger said. “Of course, everybody but the tax authorities. The problem with doing it this way is that it’s not legal.”

Van Der Veen also sought to shift blame to accounting firm Mazars, which handled the company’s and Weisselberg’s tax returns.


Mazars did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In February, the firm dropped the Trump Organization as a client and said financial statements it prepared for the company from 2011 through 2020 should no longer be relied on.

‘CLEAN UP’
If convicted, the Trump Organization – which operates hotels, golf courses and other real estate around the world – could face up to $1.6 million in fines. It could also further complicate the real estate firm’s ability to do business.

The trial is expected to last over a month. A unanimous verdict is required for conviction on each count of tax fraud, scheming to defraud, and falsifying business records.

Weisselberg admitted in his guilty plea to avoiding taxes on $1.76 million in personal income himself through the scheme. He will be required to pay nearly $2 million in unpaid taxes, penalties and interest, Hoffinger said.


Hoffinger said Trump personally paid for the private-school tuition of Weisselberg’s grandchildren, adding that the jury would see checks signed by Trump himself as evidence.

She said that when Trump was elected president in late 2016, Weisselberg and the company “had to clean up these fraudulent tax practices” due to concerns about additional scrutiny. The companies stopped paying for its employees’ unreported personal expenses, and Weisselberg began paying his grandchildren’s tuition himself, Hoffinger said.

Susan Necheles, a lawyer for the Trump Corporation, said it was Weisselberg – not the company – who wanted to clean things up.

“Donald Trump didn’t know that Allen Weisselberg was cheating on Allen Weisselberg’s personal tax returns,” Necheles said.


Weisselberg stepped down as CFO when he was indicted but remained on the payroll as a senior adviser. After his guilty plea, he continued to be paid but was put on leave.

The day he pleaded guilty, the Trump Organization called Weisselberg a “fine and honorable man” who had been harassed by law enforcement in a “politically motivated quest” to get Trump.

But in a pretrial hearing this month, Necheles accused Weisselberg of lying.

Justice Juan Merchan, the judge overseeing the case, has rejected the argument that the Trump Organization was targeted for selective prosecution.

Two top prosecutors on the case resigned in February, with one saying felony charges against Trump, a Republican, were warranted but that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg indicated doubts. Bragg, a Democrat, has said the investigation is ongoing.

The case is separate from a $250 million civil lawsuit filed by New York’s attorney general against Trump, three of his adult children and his company in September, accusing them of lying to banks and insurers by overvaluing his real estate assets and Trump’s net worth.

Trump also faces a federal criminal investigation into the removal of government documents from the White House when he left office last year.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,700
7,524
113
B.C.
Trump's company 'cheated' tax authorities, prosecutor says at trial
Author of the article:Reuters
Reuters
Karen Freifeld and Luc Cohen
Publishing date:Oct 31, 2022 • 19 hours ago • 4 minute read • 6 Comments
Attorney Michael van der Veen makes opening statements during the Trump Organization's criminal tax trial in Manhattan Criminal Court, New York City, U.S., October 31, 2022 in this courtroom sketch.
Attorney Michael van der Veen makes opening statements during the Trump Organization's criminal tax trial in Manhattan Criminal Court, New York City, U.S., October 31, 2022 in this courtroom sketch. PHOTO BY JANE ROSENBERG /REUTERS
NEW YORK — Former President Donald Trump’s real estate company cheated tax authorities for 15 years, a prosecutor said on Monday in her opening statement in the Trump Organization’s criminal tax fraud trial, while defense lawyers said the company’s longtime chief financial officer was only acting on his own behalf.


The company paid certain executives – including CFO Allen Weisselberg – in perks such as rent and car leases without reporting those benefits to tax authorities, and falsely reported bonuses as non-employee compensation, said Susan Hoffinger, a prosecutor with the Manhattan district attorney’s office.


The case is among the mounting legal troubles facing the 76-year-old Trump as he considers another bid for the presidency after losing in 2020.

Weisselberg, who has worked for Trump for nearly half a century, in August pleaded guilty and agreed to testify as a prosecution witness at trial as part of a plea agreement for him to receive a sentence of five months in jail.

Lawyers for the two Trump Organization units argued Weisselberg cheated on taxes to benefit himself, not the company. Both the Trump Corporation and the Trump Payroll Corporation have pleaded not guilty. Trump has not been charged in the case.


“Weisselberg did it for Weisselberg,” Michael Van Der Veen, a lawyer for the Trump Payroll Corporation, said in his opening statement. “Greed made him cheat on his taxes, hide his deeds from his employer, and betray the trust built over nearly 50 years.”

Hoffinger said Weisselberg was “a prime beneficiary” of the scheme. But she said he acted in his official capacity as a Trump Organization executive, and that the company also benefited by keeping top executives happy and saving on some taxes.

“Everybody wins here,” Hoffinger said. “Of course, everybody but the tax authorities. The problem with doing it this way is that it’s not legal.”

Van Der Veen also sought to shift blame to accounting firm Mazars, which handled the company’s and Weisselberg’s tax returns.


Mazars did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In February, the firm dropped the Trump Organization as a client and said financial statements it prepared for the company from 2011 through 2020 should no longer be relied on.

‘CLEAN UP’
If convicted, the Trump Organization – which operates hotels, golf courses and other real estate around the world – could face up to $1.6 million in fines. It could also further complicate the real estate firm’s ability to do business.

The trial is expected to last over a month. A unanimous verdict is required for conviction on each count of tax fraud, scheming to defraud, and falsifying business records.

Weisselberg admitted in his guilty plea to avoiding taxes on $1.76 million in personal income himself through the scheme. He will be required to pay nearly $2 million in unpaid taxes, penalties and interest, Hoffinger said.


Hoffinger said Trump personally paid for the private-school tuition of Weisselberg’s grandchildren, adding that the jury would see checks signed by Trump himself as evidence.

She said that when Trump was elected president in late 2016, Weisselberg and the company “had to clean up these fraudulent tax practices” due to concerns about additional scrutiny. The companies stopped paying for its employees’ unreported personal expenses, and Weisselberg began paying his grandchildren’s tuition himself, Hoffinger said.

Susan Necheles, a lawyer for the Trump Corporation, said it was Weisselberg – not the company – who wanted to clean things up.

“Donald Trump didn’t know that Allen Weisselberg was cheating on Allen Weisselberg’s personal tax returns,” Necheles said.


Weisselberg stepped down as CFO when he was indicted but remained on the payroll as a senior adviser. After his guilty plea, he continued to be paid but was put on leave.

The day he pleaded guilty, the Trump Organization called Weisselberg a “fine and honorable man” who had been harassed by law enforcement in a “politically motivated quest” to get Trump.

But in a pretrial hearing this month, Necheles accused Weisselberg of lying.

Justice Juan Merchan, the judge overseeing the case, has rejected the argument that the Trump Organization was targeted for selective prosecution.

Two top prosecutors on the case resigned in February, with one saying felony charges against Trump, a Republican, were warranted but that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg indicated doubts. Bragg, a Democrat, has said the investigation is ongoing.

The case is separate from a $250 million civil lawsuit filed by New York’s attorney general against Trump, three of his adult children and his company in September, accusing them of lying to banks and insurers by overvaluing his real estate assets and Trump’s net worth.

Trump also faces a federal criminal investigation into the removal of government documents from the White House when he left office last year.
Tell the IRS and let them do their job .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,700
7,524
113
B.C.
How many people did you see stopped from depositing their ballots in this video ? How would those evil right wing gun tooting facists know who is marked on the ballot ? Are you scared of guns , or the people who carry them ? Remember police officers , wild life wardens , customs officers , ATF officers , private security , transit cops , so many gun carriers to be scared of .
 

The_Foxer

House Member
Aug 9, 2022
3,084
1,839
113
How would those evil right wing gun tooting facists know who is marked on the ballot ?
This is my biggest question mark with this - how would they know if they were scaring off someone that was voting for someone they like?

And Serryah - you were very supportive of the girl who was taking pictures of license plates earlier.

They didn't ask anyone not to vote, they're not interfering with anyone voting, there's zero reports of anyone being harassed because they voted - they're just sitting there doing nothing. Sooooo - if they're trying to "intimidate" people, they REALLY suck at it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,290
113
Trump 2024 campaign prepares for post-midterms launch
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Jill Colvin
Publishing date:Nov 02, 2022 • 1 day ago • 6 minute read • 5 Comments

NEW YORK — As he played to a crowd of supporters in Robstown, Texas, former President Donald Trump drew cheers as he talked up his first two runs for the White House — and teased a third.


“In order to make our country successful, safe and glorious again, I will probably have to do it again,” he said last month.


That carefully placed “probably” may soon be gone from Trump’s stump speech. Aides to the former president are making quiet preparations for a 2024 presidential campaign that could be launched soon after next week’s midterm elections as Trump tries to capitalize on expected Republican wins to propel himself toward becoming the front-runner for his party’s nomination.

“I’m like 95% he’s going to run,” said Reince Priebus, Trump’s former White House chief of staff. “The real question,” he added, “is are other big challengers going to run? If President Trump runs, he will be very difficult for any Republican to defeat.”


Another campaign would be a remarkable turn for any former president, much less one who made history as the first to be impeached twice and remains embroiled in multiple and intensifying criminal investigations, including probes of classified information held at his Mar-a-Lago club and his effort to pressure election officials to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Trump has a history dating back to the 1980s of publicly toying with White House bids only to back down.

But Trump, according to people close to him, is eager to be back in the political game. While he has been talking up a bid since before he left the White House, aides and allies are now eyeing the two-week stretch after the Nov. 8 midterms as a possible window for an announcement, though they caution that he hasn’t made a decision and that — as always when it comes to Trump — things could change, particularly if the election results are delayed due to recounts or a possible runoff election in Georgia.


Indeed, even as discussions are underway about potential venues and dates for a formal announcement, Trump continues to tease the possibility of declaring his intentions at one of the rallies he’s planned for the election’s homestretch.

The preparations come as Trump has been stepping up his efforts to help midterm candidates in the election’s final weeks, hoping to piggyback off expected Republican gains in Congress to build momentum for his own campaign.

Trump has dramatically ramped up his spending after facing criticism for failing to financially help his favored candidates while continuing to vacuum up small-dollar donations. His newly launched MAGA Inc. super PAC has now spent more than $16.4 million on ads in a handful of competitive states, according to the ad tracking firm AdImpact, with additional investments expected through Election Day, according to people familiar with the effort, who, like others, spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal operations.


And Trump continues to hold events to bolster his candidates, with 30 rallies so far in 17 states, along with dozens of virtual rallies and more than 50 candidate fundraisers. His final midterm rally blitz will take him to Ohio and Pennsylvania, two crucial presidential voting states where his endorsements helped candidates secure their nominations. He’ll also return to Iowa, which holds the first contest of the presidential nominating calendar.

In total, Trump’s Save America PAC says he has raised nearly $350 million this election cycle for Republican candidates and party committees, including online fundraising solicitations.

While Trump’s team has been identifying potential staff prospects in key states and drawing up paperwork to file should he move forward with an announcement, according to people familiar with the planning, one stressed that hiring has not yet commenced. Trump’s campaign, at least in its early months, is expected to remain headquartered in Florida and look much like his current political operation, overseen by the small clutch of advisers he’s fostered since leaving office — reminiscent of his famously threadbare 2016 campaign.


Chris LaCivita, the Republican strategist who was behind the “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” campaign that badly damaged Democrat John Kerry’s 2004 presidential prospects, is working for Trump’s super PAC and expected to take on a senior leadership role in the campaign operation, according to people familiar with the conversations, as is Susie Wiles, the longtime Florida operative who has been overseeing his political efforts.

The 2024 campaign will effectively kick off when the polls close on Nov. 8, and potential challengers have spent months carefully laying the groundwork for their own expected campaigns. That includes Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is widely seen as Trump’s most formidable challenger and who has been cultivating a deep donor network as he runs for reelection.


Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, Florida Sen. Rick Scott and Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton have been aggressively stumping for midterm candidates, as have former Vice President Mike Pence, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley.

Trump, meanwhile, faces mounting challenges. He remains a deeply polarizing figure, particularly after spending the last two years spreading lies about the 2020 election. And while Trump remains overwhelmingly popular among Republicans, an October AP-NORC poll found 43% said they don’t want to see him run for president in 2024.

Underscoring that polarization, many in Trump’s orbit had urged him to wait on an announcement until after the midterms to avoid turning the election into a referendum on him.


Others close to Trump remain skeptical that he will ultimately go through with another run, contending that his ego can’t take another loss or fearing a possible indictment. Others question whether he will ultimately end up on the ballot in 2024, even if he does launch a campaign.

Campaigns also need staff and Trump’s orbit has shrunk considerably over the last two years. Many former aides are expected to steer clear of another effort either because they have broken with Trump, have moved on, or are fearful that involvement could expose them to potential legal scrutiny — and lawyers’ bills.

For someone on the verge of launching a presidential campaign, Trump also remains unusually distracted by legal threats.


There is the Justice Department’s intensifying investigation into how hundreds of documents with classified markings ended up at his club in Palm Beach, Florida. State prosecutors in Georgia continue to probe his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, as do the DOJ and the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol attack, which recently served him a subpoena demanding testimony.

In New York, Attorney General Letitia James has sued Trump, alleging his namesake company engaged in decades of fraudulent bookkeeping. The Trump Organization is now on trial for criminal tax fraud charges, and Trump recently sat for a deposition in a lawsuit filed by E. Jean Carroll, who alleges Trump raped her in the mid-1990s. Trump denies the allegations.


All the while, Republicans across the country, from high-dollar donors to longtime GOP leaders and rank-and-file voters, have been considering whether they want to stick with Trump.

At a recent Iowa Republican Party fundraiser headlined by Pence, voters praised Trump’s time in office but were mixed on whether they want him to mount another campaign.

“I’d like to see him run again,” said 81-year-old Jane Murphy, a longtime county Republican volunteer who lives in Davenport. “He makes me angry with some of the things he says. But he gets the job done, plain and simple.”

But Carol Crain, an eastern Iowa GOP activist, voiced reservations.

“I think a lot of Republicans are just tired of the drama and the fighting,” said Crain, 73. “It’s really wearing. Under their breath, people say it would be nice if he could endorse somebody and go away with grace.”
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,290
113
Donald Trump hints at fresh White House bid, tells suppporters to 'get ready'
Author of the article:Reuters
Reuters
Steve Holland and Jarrett Renshaw
Publishing date:Nov 04, 2022 • 1 day ago • 3 minute read • 28 Comments

WASHINGTON — Former President Donald Trump is considering launching a third bid for the White House this month, three Trump advisers said on Thursday, while Trump himself teased a strong possibility of a comeback during a rally in Iowa later in the day.


“And now, in order to make our country successful and safe and glorious, I will very, very, very probably do it again,” the former president said during the rally on Thursday night, teasing a 2024 bid.


“Get ready, that’s all I’m telling you, very soon. Get ready,” he added.

Trump was speed-dialing confidantes to hash out possible scenarios as he looks to benefit from expected Republican wins in Tuesday’s midterms, his advisers said.

“I think like a moth to a flame, Trump will run in 2024,” one senior adviser told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity. “I think that he wants to run and announcing before Thanksgiving gives him a great advantage over his opponents and he understands that.”

An announcement in the coming weeks could box out potential rivals for the party’s nomination, the advisers said, though they added it was possible the former president could still delay a decision or change his mind.


A representative for Trump did not respond to a request for comment.

One source familiar with Trump’s plans said he intends to announce his re-election campaign shortly after Tuesday’s elections and has been sounding out potential staff. The source was approached by the campaign to gauge interest.

Nonpartisan election forecasters and polls say it is highly likely Republicans will win a majority in the U.S. House of Representatives and also have a shot at taking control of the Senate, which would give them the power to block President Joe Biden’s legislative agenda for the next two years.

Democrats’ electoral hopes have been hammered by voter concerns about high inflation, and Biden’s public approval rating has remained below 50% for more than a year, coming in at 40% in a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll.


But Trump also remains unpopular after his divisive four-year term that ended with the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol by his followers, then two years during which he has continued to claim falsely that his election defeat was the result of fraud.

Trump currently faces a raft of investigations, including a Justice Department probe into classified documents he took from the White House after leaving office, some of which prosecutors say have not yet been recovered.

And the Reuters/Ipsos poll late last month showed that just 41% of Americans view Trump favourably.

The Thanksgiving holiday is on Nov. 24, providing Trump a two-week window after the elections to make his announcement should he wish to do so.


Trump has kept up a steady pace of political rallies since leaving office, during which he has regularly flirted with possibility that he would contest the presidency again.

He is expected to host family and friends at his Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, on Tuesday night to celebrate expected victories among candidates he backed in the midterms.

In a direct challenge to Trump, several major Republican figures are considering whether to seek the party’s presidential nomination in 2024.

Trump is keeping a close eye on Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who is expected to win his re-election race on Tuesday against Democrat Charlie Crist. Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin and Trump’s former vice president, Mike Pence, are also seen as being among potential rivals.

Announcing his re-election campaign soon could help propel Trump in the early voting states of Iowa — where he is due to appear at a rally on Thursday — and South Carolina while his rivals are still working on their own 2024 plans, the senior adviser said.
 

The_Foxer

House Member
Aug 9, 2022
3,084
1,839
113
A damn good exercise to see just how 'the same' the parties are and figuring which you would vote for.

No, it isn't. It's just a left winger falling victim to his own bias and prejudice.

first off - you have to be 7 different kinds of stupid to believe the parties are the same fiscally. The republicans would never be trying to do the biden "eliminate student debt" thing. They would never have spent as much on the 'covid money for all' policies. And we're not talking about inconsequential amounts here. That's going to come back to haunt the US.

As to the next one - that is a MORONIC exercise that completely shows his bias and ignorance. I would feel about the same leaving my friend with either group. He's suggesting that you should be AFRRRAAAAAIID - Deathly afraid that anyone wearing a red hat will attack and harm anyone different!!!!!

But they don't. That's actually a liberal left thing. You can wear a 'Go Go Joe Biden" hat up and down the street all you like and NOBODY from the right is going to do anything. But as numerous videos show - if you try that with a maga hat you will be assaulted in short order.

Left wingers promote the idea that the right is the violent group - but that is a blatant falsehood. The left is far more likely to attack someone for being different than them.

So i know if i leave my friend, be he gay or black or jewish or whatever, with a bunch of right wingers, he'll be safe. If i leave him with a bunch of left wingers - i will have to worry whether or not he's THEIR type of gay or black or whatever because if not they may become hostile.

All this is is proof that the left wing are bigoted and ignorant morons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,290
113
'Putin's chef' admits to U.S. election meddling
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Publishing date:Nov 07, 2022 • 22 hours ago • 3 minute read • Join the conversation

Kremlin-connected entrepreneur Yevgeny Prigozhin admitted Monday that he had interfered in U.S. elections and would continue to do so — confirming for the first time the accusations that he has rejected for years.


“Gentlemen, we have interfered, are interfering and will interfere. Carefully, precisely, surgically and in our own way, as we know how to do,” Prigozhin boasted in remarks posted on social media.


The statement, from the press service of his catering company that earned him the nickname “Putin’s chef,” came on the eve of U.S. midterm elections in response to a request for comment.

A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment.

It was the second major admission in recent months by the 61-year-old businessman, who has ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin. Prigozhin has previously sought to keep his activities under the radar and now appears increasingly interested in gaining political clout.


In September, he also publicly stated that he was behind the Wagner Group mercenary force — something he also had previously denied — and talked openly about its involvement in Russia’s eight-month-old war in Ukraine. The military contractor also has sent its forces to places like Syria and sub-Saharan Africa.

Video also has emerged recently of a man resembling Prigozhin visiting Russian penal colonies to recruit prisoners to fight in Ukraine.

In 2018, Prigozhin and a dozen other Russian nationals and three Russian companies were charged in the U.S. with operating a covert social media campaign aimed at fomenting discord and dividing American public opinion ahead of the 2016 presidential election won by Republican Donald Trump. They were indicted as part of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian election interference.


The Justice Department in 2020 moved to dismiss charges against two of the indicted firms, Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Concord Catering, saying they had concluded that a trial against a corporate defendant with no presence in the U.S. and no prospect of meaningful punishment even if convicted would likely expose sensitive law enforcement tools and techniques.

In July, the State Department offered a reward of up to $10 million for information about Russian interference in U.S. elections, including on Prigozhin and the Internet Research Agency, the troll farm in St. Petersburg that his companies were accused of funding. Prigozhin also has been sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury Department for election interference.


Until now, Prigozhin had denied Russian involvement in election interference.

Russian media, prisoner’s rights groups and relatives of prisoners this year reported an extensive effort by Wagner — and sometimes Prigozhin personally — to recruit convicts to fight in Ukraine. Prigozhin hasn’t directly confirmed it, but said in one statement that “either (the Wagner private military company) and convicts, or your children” will be fighting on the front lines.

Last week, Wagner opened a business centre in St. Petersburg, which Prigozhin has described as a platform for “increasing the defence capabilities” of Russia.

On Sunday, he also announced through Concord the creation of training centers for militias in Russia’s Belgorod and Kursk regions that border Ukraine.


“A local resident, like no one else, knows his territories, is able to fight against sabotage and reconnaissance groups and take the first blow if necessary,” he said.

A one-time hot dog stand owner, Prigozhin opened a swanky restaurant in St. Petersburg that drew interest from Putin. During his first term in office, Putin took then-French President Jacques Chirac to dine at one of Prigozhin’s restaurants.

“Vladimir Putin saw how I built a business out of a kiosk, he saw that I don’t mind serving to the esteemed guests because they were my guests,” Prigozhin recalled in an interview published in 2011.

His businesses expanded significantly. In 2010, Putin attended the opening of Prigozhin’s factory making school lunches that was built on generous loans by a state bank. In Moscow alone, his company Concord won millions of dollars in contracts to provide meals at public schools. Prigozhin has also organized catering for Kremlin events for several years and has provided catering and utility services to the Russian military.

When fighting broke out in eastern Ukraine between Russian-backed separatists and Kyiv’s forces in 2014, Prigozhin said though his spokespeople that he was seeking to “put together a group (of fighters) that would go (there) and defend the Russians.”

Russian laws prohibit the operation of private military contractors, but state media in recent months have openly reported on Wagner’s involvement in Ukraine.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,290
113
Democrats beat Trump-backed GOP candidates in liberal states
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Sara Burnett, Jill Colvin And Will Weissert
Publishing date:Nov 08, 2022 • 16 hours ago • 5 minute read • 26 Comments

WASHINGTON — Democrats easily repelled Republicans backed by former President Donald Trump in several left-leaning states Tuesday, while tougher tests that could decide control of Congress and the future of Joe Biden’s presidency awaited in more competitive territory.


Despite their liberal history, states like Massachusetts, Maryland and Illinois have elected moderate Republican governors in the past. But the Republicans this year appeared to be too conservative in these states, handing Democrats easy victories in a year that could otherwise prove difficult for the party.


Massachusetts and Maryland also saw historic firsts: Democrat Maura Healey became the first openly gay person and first woman elected as Massachusetts’ governor and Wes Moore became the first Black governor of Maryland. Incumbent Gov. J.B. Pritzker held on to his job in Illinois.

In Florida, a state that was once a battleground but has become increasingly Republican, Gov. Ron DeSantis won a second term, defeating Democratic challenger Charlie Crist, a former congressman. The victory continues DeSantis’ rise as a national Republican star as he eyes a possible 2024 White House run that could leave him well positioned to be a GOP primary alternative to Donald Trump. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio also won reelection, fending off a challenge from Democrat Val Demings and further illustrating the state’s rightward shift.


The outcome of races for House and Senate will determine the future of Biden’s agenda and serve as a referendum on his administration as the nation reels from record-high inflation and concerns over the direction of the country. Republican control of the House would likely trigger a round of investigations into Biden and his family, while a GOP Senate takeover would hobble Biden’s ability to make judicial appointments.

Democrats were facing historic headwinds. The party in power almost always suffers losses in the president’s first midterm elections, but Democrats had been hoping that anger from the Supreme Court’s decision to gut abortion rights might energize their voters to buck historical trends.

Even Biden, who planned to watch the evening’s election returns at the White House, said late Monday night that he thought his party would keep the Senate but “the House is tougher.” Asked how that would make governing, his assessment was stark: “More difficult.”


In Georgia, Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock and Republican challenger Herschel Walker were vying for a seat that could determine control of the Senate. In Virginia, Democratic Reps. Abigail Spanberger and Elaine Luria were fending off spirited Republican opponents in what could serve as early signals of where the House majority is heading as Republicans hope to reclaim suburban districts that shifted to Democrats during Donald Trump’s tumultuous presidency.

Republicans are betting that messaging focused on the economy, gas prices and crime will resonate with voters at a time of soaring inflation and rising violence.

AP VoteCast, a broad survey of the national electorate, showed that high inflation and concerns about the fragility of democracy were heavily influencing voters.


Half of voters said inflation factored significantly, with groceries, gasoline, housing, food and other costs that have shot up in the past year. Slightly fewer — 44% — said the future of democracy was their primary consideration.

Few major voting problems were reported around the country, though there were hiccups typical of most Election Days. Some tabulators were not working in a New Jersey county. In Philadelphia, where Democrats are counting on strong turnout, people complained about being turned away as they showed up in person to try to fix problems with their previously cast mail-in ballots.

In Maricopa County, Arizona, which encompasses Phoenix and is the state’s largest county, officials reported problems with vote-tabulation machines in about 20% of voting places. That fueled anger and skepticism about voting that has been growing among some Republicans since the state went narrowly for Biden in 2020.


Polls were still open in several states with high-profile races for Senate or governor, including Pennsylvania, Nevada, Wisconsin, Arizona and Michigan. Voters in many of these states were also choosing secretaries of state, roles that typically generate little attention but have come under growing scrutiny as GOP contenders who refused to accept the results of the 2020 campaign were running to control the management of future elections.

In the first national election since the Jan. 6 insurrection, the country’s democratic future is in question. Some who participated in or were in the vicinity of the attack are poised to win elected office Tuesday, including several running for House seats. Concerns about political violence are also on the rise less than two weeks after a suspect under the spell of conspiracy theories targeted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco home and brutally beat her 82-year-old husband.


The 2022 elections are on track to cost a projected $16.7 billion at the state and federal level, making them the most expensive midterms ever, according to the nonpartisan campaign finance tracking organization OpenSecrets.

Republicans entered the final stretch of the campaign in a strong position to retake control of at least one chamber of Congress, giving them power to thwart Biden’s agenda for the remaining two years of his term. The GOP needed a net gain of just one seat to win the U.S. Senate and five to regain the U.S. House.

All House seats were up for grabs, as were 34 Senate seats — with cliffhangers especially likely in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona. Thirty-six states are electing governors, with many of those races also poised to come down to the slimmest of margins.


The dynamic was more complicated in state capitals. The GOP faced unexpected headwinds in flipping the governor’s office in conservative Kansas. Democrats, meanwhile, were nervous about their prospects in the governor’s race in Oregon, typically a liberal bastion.

If the GOP has an especially strong election, winning Democrat-held congressional seats in places like New Hampshire or Washington state, pressure could build for Biden to opt against a reelection run in 2024. Trump, meanwhile, may try to capitalize on GOP gains by formally launching another bid for the White House during a “very big announcement” in Florida next week.

The former president endorsed more than 300 candidates in the midterm cycle and is hoping to use Republican victories as a springboard for a 2024 presidential campaign.


“Well, I think if they win, I should get all the credit. And if they lose, I should not be blamed at all. But it will probably be just the opposite,” Trump said in an interview with NewsNation.

It could be days or even weeks before races — and potentially, control of Congress — are decided. Some states with mail voting, such as Michigan, saw an increase in ballot returns compared with the 2018 midterm. Those votes can take longer to count because, in many states, ballots must be postmarked by Tuesday but might not arrive at election offices until days later. In Georgia’s Senate race, the candidates must win at least 50% of the vote to avoid a Dec. 6 runoff.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
37,568
3,290
113
Voting snag in Arizona fuels election conspiracy theories
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Anita Snow And Nathan Ellgren
Publishing date:Nov 08, 2022 • 15 hours ago • 4 minute read • Join the conversation

PHOENIX — A printing malfunction at about one-quarter of the polling places across Arizona’s most populous county slowed down voting Tuesday, but election officials assured voters that every ballot would be counted.


Still, the issue at 60 of 223 vote centers in Maricopa County gave rise to conspiracy theories about the integrity of the vote in the pivotal state. Former President Donald Trump, Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake and others weighed in to claim that Democrats were trying to subvert the vote of Republicans, who tend to show up in greater numbers in person on Election Day.


Lake and several other candidates on the Arizona ballot have pushed false claims about the 2020 presidential race, amplifying Trump’s lies about a stolen election. But election officials from both political parties and members of Trump’s own Cabinet have said there was no widespread voter fraud and that Trump lost reelection to Democrat Joe Biden.


Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Timothy Ryan denied a request from Republicans to keep the polls open, saying that he didn’t see evidence that people were not allowed to vote.

After polls closed, the county supervisor, Republican Bill Gates, apologized, but said “every voter had the opportunity to vote and have their vote counted.”

The issue affected an unknown number of ballots in the county. About 4.5 million people live in the sprawling city and about 2.4 million are registered voters. More than 80% cast their ballots early, most by mail, and the county said about 230,000 had voted in-person about an hour before polls closed.

At issue were printers that were not producing dark enough markings on the ballots, which required election officials to change the printer settings. Until then, some voters who tried to insert their ballots into voting tabulators were forced to wait and use other machines or were told they could leave their ballots in a drop box. Those votes were expected to be counted Wednesday.


When voters in the county check in, they are handed a ballot for their specific election precinct; the races for which they can vote are printed for them. That process allows voters to go to any voting location in the county. The voters then fill out the ballot and put it into a tabulation machine to be counted.

Some of the tabulators did not read the ballots because the printers did not produce what are known as “timing marks” dark enough to be read by the machines. Timing marks tell a ballot scanner the voter’s precinct, party and other information so it can properly tabulate their choices. Voters who had their ballots rejected were told they could try the location’s second tabulator, put it in a ballot box to be counted at the central facility later or cancel it and go to another vote center.


Election officials have a variety of tools, including a different type of scanner, for accurately reading the lightly inked marks, said Eddie Perez, an election technology specialist with OSET Institute, an election security and integrity nonprofit organization. He was confident the ballots would be accurately processed.

The majority of Arizona counties do not count ballots at polling places. Officials bring the ballots to a central facility for counting. The ballots that were left in the drop boxes in Maricopa County will be counted at their central site.

The county’s main election building where votes are tabulated was the scene of protests by hundreds of Trump supporters, some of whom were armed, after he lost in 2020. Just after polls closed at 7 p.m., mounted deputies deployed to the counting center. Gates, the county supervisor, said there was no need for protesters to come to the facility, although he said they had a right to be there.


“There’s nothing that happened here today that would indicate a need to be out here, a need to address some injustice,” Gates said. “We had an issue with printers that has been addressed by the good people of Maricopa County.”

The problem slowed down voting in both traditionally Democratic and Republican areas, especially at an outlet mall in conservative far-flung Anthem. Some voters there reported waiting several hours to be able to vote with the only one of two tabulators working.

At a polling place on the other side of the county, Phoenix voter Maggie Perini said she was able to vote without problem, but that a man next her in line struggled with his ballot at a different tabulator. When he switched to the machine she had used, the ballot went through.

“And then I know one woman who was coming out, she tried like four or five times for it to work and it wasn’t working,” said Perini. “And someone had told her she could leave her ballot and she’s like, No, no, no, no, no.”

Voter Michael McCuarrie said his ballot wasn’t read so he dropped it off to be counted later.

“Fine as long as the vote is counted,” said McCuarrie. “I don’t mind.”
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,027
3,812
113
Edmonton
The results show that voters are not doing their due diligence: voting in a Senator that can't put two words together (poor soul needs to heal) and voted for a man who died a month previous but too late to delete him from the ballot - so obviously, people are not paying attention. It's rather frustrating but hey, it is what it is.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Serryah