COVID-19 'Pandemic'

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,303
11,389
113
Low Earth Orbit

right from the horse's mouth:​

Spike Protein is Very Dangerous, it’s Cytotoxic Says the INVENTOR of mRNA Vaccine Technology​

ON JUNE 17, 2021 BY GERI UNGUREANIN UNCATEGORIZED
Clip from DarkHorse podcast.
Full livestream here: https://youtu.be/-_NNTVJzqtY
Bitchute for backup:


lol sleepie's "fatcheckers"

No sign that the COVID-19 vaccines’ spike protein is toxic or ‘cytotoxic’​

Yes, daisy pollen is nasty stuff and why so many need to take Claritin or suffer from hay fever.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,303
11,389
113
Low Earth Orbit

Bacteria on Masks Poses Health Threat Study Shows​



A new study was put out by Dr. Colleen Huber surrounding the microbial challenges from masks. The study shows that the bacteria accumulated on masks from prolonged use actually poses a significant health risk.

The fully referenced study states:

“Over 2,000 Belgian medical professionals, including hundreds of medical doctors, have urged prevention of COVID-19 by means of strengthening natural immunity.”

This is a significant statement because all of the ways we can naturally strengthen our immunity have been highly criticized in American media. These include supplementation such as vitamin D3, vitamin C, zinc, and iodine. This could even involve an exposure immunity, often referenced as herd immunity. The irony here being that nearly all of us have known to do these things as a part of general health practice, but such common knowledge seems to have vanished in the year 2020.

The report addresses the effectiveness of using masks as well:

“Penetration of cloth masks by viral particles was almost 97% and of surgical masks was 44%. … Face masks became almost ineffective after two hours of use, and after 150 minutes of use, more bacteria was emitted through the disposable mask than from the same subject unmasked.”

In other words, these masks that many of us are forced to wear at our jobs for extended periods of time to protect others are actually creating a larger risk by increasing the amount of emitted bacteria. We are constantly breathing in and out through these fabrics, and the bacteria essentially stockpiles onto the mask over time. It should be common sense that eventually, exhaling through this bacterial layer will only emit even larger clusters of infectious material.

All of this is to prevent the spread of this super infectious virus we are told. But is that really the case?

“COVID-19 is a remarkably low transmissibility disease. … From 18 initial positive tests, only 2 out of 863 close contacts tested positive as a secondary case.”

The more reporting on COVID19 that we do, the more we discover that every aspect of this has been a lie. We know that Fauci was working on bat-coronavirus gain-of-function projects. Dr. Li-Meng Yan broke down the genome to prove it was man made. We know increased pillar 2 testing increases cases by means of false positives.

And we also know that Dr. Fauci co-authored a report about the bacterial risks of face masks from the 1918-1919 flu pandemic. Page 6 of Dr. Huber’s report details how his report linked the wearing of masks to bacterial pneumonia, bronchopneumonia, and staphylococcal pneumoniae due to breathing in bacterial colonies that were intended to be dispelled from the body.

“In fact, there were no negative lung culture results in any of the specimens.”

We previously showed you how the science between masks and virus prevention showed that masks do not work. Dr. Colleen Huber is showing you how they may actually cause you serious harm. Accumulated bacteria on masks poses significant health risks that our bodies are not prepared for, and likely will be mistreated as the symptoms will ultimately align with a new case of COVID19.
The study shows that the bacteria accumulated on masks from prolonged use actually poses a significant health risk.

But you're golden if you aren't cheap and use fresh ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: taxslave

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island

Bacteria on Masks Poses Health Threat Study Shows​



A new study was put out by Dr. Colleen Huber surrounding the microbial challenges from masks. The study shows that the bacteria accumulated on masks from prolonged use actually poses a significant health risk.

The fully referenced study states:

“Over 2,000 Belgian medical professionals, including hundreds of medical doctors, have urged prevention of COVID-19 by means of strengthening natural immunity.”

This is a significant statement because all of the ways we can naturally strengthen our immunity have been highly criticized in American media. These include supplementation such as vitamin D3, vitamin C, zinc, and iodine. This could even involve an exposure immunity, often referenced as herd immunity. The irony here being that nearly all of us have known to do these things as a part of general health practice, but such common knowledge seems to have vanished in the year 2020.

The report addresses the effectiveness of using masks as well:

“Penetration of cloth masks by viral particles was almost 97% and of surgical masks was 44%. … Face masks became almost ineffective after two hours of use, and after 150 minutes of use, more bacteria was emitted through the disposable mask than from the same subject unmasked.”

In other words, these masks that many of us are forced to wear at our jobs for extended periods of time to protect others are actually creating a larger risk by increasing the amount of emitted bacteria. We are constantly breathing in and out through these fabrics, and the bacteria essentially stockpiles onto the mask over time. It should be common sense that eventually, exhaling through this bacterial layer will only emit even larger clusters of infectious material.

All of this is to prevent the spread of this super infectious virus we are told. But is that really the case?

“COVID-19 is a remarkably low transmissibility disease. … From 18 initial positive tests, only 2 out of 863 close contacts tested positive as a secondary case.”

The more reporting on COVID19 that we do, the more we discover that every aspect of this has been a lie. We know that Fauci was working on bat-coronavirus gain-of-function projects. Dr. Li-Meng Yan broke down the genome to prove it was man made. We know increased pillar 2 testing increases cases by means of false positives.

And we also know that Dr. Fauci co-authored a report about the bacterial risks of face masks from the 1918-1919 flu pandemic. Page 6 of Dr. Huber’s report details how his report linked the wearing of masks to bacterial pneumonia, bronchopneumonia, and staphylococcal pneumoniae due to breathing in bacterial colonies that were intended to be dispelled from the body.

“In fact, there were no negative lung culture results in any of the specimens.”

We previously showed you how the science between masks and virus prevention showed that masks do not work. Dr. Colleen Huber is showing you how they may actually cause you serious harm. Accumulated bacteria on masks poses significant health risks that our bodies are not prepared for, and likely will be mistreated as the symptoms will ultimately align with a new case of COVID19.
Well no shit. I have been telling people that since the beginning of the covid scam but some of them insisted if I can't provide a link instead of a textbook it isn't true.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,612
2,359
113
Toronto, ON
  • Like
Reactions: DaSleeper

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,361
5,766
113
Twin Moose Creek
I'm sure. Just like regular vaccines cause autism. People still believe that crap when the original paper was debunked and proven to be full of shit and done by a bad "scientist".
Oh? He is one of the scientists ordered to do the debunking by CDC

Current CDC Senior Scientist Dr. William Thompson revealed in a shocking statement that top US doctors hid and destroyed data that showed a vaccine-autism link in African-American boys.

The doctors actually sat in a room and tossed the hard copies of the documented evidence into a garbage can.

Thompson said he was told to destroy the evidence but kept it because he believed it was against the law.

Here is the full statement by current CDC Senior Scientist on Vaccine-Autism questions: Dr. William Thompson. Stay tuned to this website for an update on the story, soon.

I regret that my [CDC] coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the Journal of Pediatrics.

My primary job duties while working in the immunization safety branch from 2000 to 2006 were to lead or colead three major vaccine safety studies. The MADDSP MMR-Autism Cases
Control Study was being carried out in response to the Wakefield Lancet study that suggested an association between the MMR vaccine and an autism-like health outcome.
There were several major concerns among scientists and consumer advocates outside the CDC in the fall of 2000 regarding the execution of the Verstraeten study.

And it goes on in the article
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,303
11,389
113
Low Earth Orbit
Stage 2 started today with restrictions eased. Was just downtown, restaurants are packed, casino lot was full and non-homless people back on the streets.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113

Majority of Physicians Decline COVID Shots, according to Survey by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)​

Wed, June 16, 2021, 1:46 PM·2 min read

TUCSON, Ariz., June 16, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Of the 700 physicians responding to an internet survey by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), nearly 60 percent said they were not "fully vaccinated" against COVID.

This contrasts with the claim by the American Medical Association that 96 percent of practicing physicians are fully vaccinated. This was based on 300 respondents.
The national AMA survey is the first to specifically collect data on practicing physicians’ COVID-19 vaccination rates. The survey was conducted June 3–8 and showed an increase of more than 20 percent for physicians who have been fully vaccinated for COVID-19 compared to a May 2021 Medscape poll.
 
Last edited:

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Stage 2 started today with restrictions eased. Was just downtown, restaurants are packed, casino lot was full and non-homless people back on the streets.
All good till flu season in the fall.
;)
Just ask the brits.

I still see peeps imprisoned in their contaminated masks and delusional mental hells all over the place.

"Two weeks to flatten the curve"...lol, they didn't say the "curve" is the one of EVERYONE'S life story arcs. not to mention weeks are years in kookoospeak.
 
Last edited:

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Second recall and warning by FDA indicate a strong crackdown on unauthorized COVID-19 tests

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued its second Class 1 recall (the most serious recall the FDA uses) of a COVID-19 test. This one comes less than two weeks after the FDA recalled another COVID-19 test for similar issues.

The first recall occurred May 28, 2021, and it applied to COVID-19 tests sold by Lepu Technology without authorization (See FDA Issues Public Safety Communication Warning Public and Healthcare Providers About COVID-19 Tests Sold By Lepu Technology).

On June 10, 2021, the FDA issued the second and most recent Class 1 recall for COVID-19 testing. Simultaneously, the FDA provided a letter to the public and to healthcare providers, warning them to immediately stop using the affected tests. The test affected by the second recall is the Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test.

Covid-19: Innova lateral flow test is not fit for “test and release” strategy, say experts​

The government has claimed that rapid lateral flow covid-19 tests, which are being used in mass testing pilots in England and can provide results in 30 minutes, are “accurate and sensitive enough to be used in the community,” after evaluation results were published.1

However, experts warn that the tests may miss as many as half of covid-19 cases, depending on who is using them—making them unsuitable for a “test and release” strategy to enable people to leave lockdown or to allow students to go home from university.

The ongoing assessment, carried out by Public Health England’s Porton Down laboratory and the University of Oxford, tested a number of lateral flow devices in different settings including hospitals, schools, and universities....

...“The poor detection rate of the test makes it entirely unsuitable for the government’s claim that it will allow safe ‘test and release’ of people from lockdown and students from university,” he warned. “As the test may miss up to half of covid-19 cases, a negative test result indicates a reduced risk of infection but does not exclude covid-19...


Leaked Video: Top Canadian Pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson, Tells Alberta Government COVID Is “The Greatest Hoax Ever Perpetrated on an Unsuspecting Public” | Masks don’t protect, social distancing does nothing, tests are also useless​

 
Last edited:

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
The use of the antiparasitic drug ivermectin could lead to “large reductions” in COVID-19 deaths and may have a “significant impact” on the pandemic globally, according to a recent pre-print review based on peer-reviewed studies.

For the study (pdf), published June 17 in the American Journal of Therapeutics, a group of scientists reviewed the clinical trial use of ivermectin, which has antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, in 24 randomized controlled trials involving just more than 3,400 participants. The researchers sought to assess the efficacy of ivermectin in reducing infection or mortality in people with COVID-19 or at high risk of getting it.

Using multiple methods of sequential analysis, the researchers concluded with a moderate level of confidence that the drug reduced the risk of death in COVID-19 patients by an average of 62 percent, at a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.19–0.79, in a sample of 2,438 patients.

Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the risk of death was found to be 2.3 percent among those treated with the drug, compared to 7.8 percent for those who weren’t, according to the review.

“Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease,” the authors wrote.

Epoch Times Photo
A health worker shows a box containing a bottle of Ivermectin as part of a study of the Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases Studies, in Cali, Colombia, on July 21, 2020. (Luis Robayo/AFP via Getty Images)
Since the start of the pandemic, both observational and randomized studies have evaluated ivermectin as a treatment for, and as prevention against, COVID-19 infection.

“A review by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance summarized findings from 27 studies on the effects of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection, concluding that ivermectin ‘demonstrates a strong signal of therapeutic efficacy’ against COVID-19,” the researchers wrote, referring to one recent review, which was based on data from both peer-reviewed studies and pre-print manuscripts.

They cited another recent review that concluded that ivermectin reduced deaths by as much as 75 percent, while noting that neither the National Institutes of Health in the United States nor the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended the use of ivermectin outside clinical trials for use against COVID-19.


But hey, if you stop this with over the counter...no emergency, no emergency authorizations for the experimental vaccines. No profits for "mr common core" Bill Gates and his pharma pals. No massive lockdown profits for "mr cia" Bezos (Amazon just banned the Front Line Doctors website from the net BTW) either.
No green agenda nor agenda2030, no WEF "...you will eat bugs...and be happy", no greta reset, nor soros funded blm nor antifa marxist revolutions for the bankers.

Amazon gave Frontline Doctors 4 days notice before permanently deleting its website​

America’s Frontline Doctors, a group that protests scientific fraud about COVID-19 therapies and irresponsible and damaging responses to the pandemic by health regulators and medical media, had their website, which provided the public with valuable informational resources, announced their site had been taken down by Amazon.
 
Last edited:

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​


A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.


  • Overall, we rate The Epoch Times Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of pseudoscience and the promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, as well as numerous failed fact checks.