Canadians prefer Trump over trudeau

S

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
EagleSmack said:
Trump > Trudeau
Click to expand...


Is it not amusing what a selfish slanted view LIE-berals have of the `elbowgate scandal` in which our prime minister-the Boy with nice hair-for Brains cursed and swore at other MP`s and man-handled them and accidentally STRUCK a female MP who had the temerity Not to get out of the way fast enough!

And how sad is it that LIE-berals have FORGOTTEN their former favorite parliamentary disrupter-the wretched `Tequila Sheila/She LIED Sheila/AKA Sheila Copps and her `rat pack gang of loud and OBNOXIOUS clowns`! Hooting and roaring, jumping over desks to get at people to harass them and generally cutting up FAR WORSE than a pack of NDP MP`s simply standing in an aisle way DISCUSSING how and why Our brainless Boy was trying-YET AGAIN-to DAMAGE and LIMIT Cdn democracy by cutting into the discussion time needed to review contentious new bills!

But there it -its Why we call them LIE-berals-they have no sense of proportion for one thing and they DON’T believe their shit stinks! Its nice to be a hypocrite-and smells better too-so THE LIE-berals say!

LIE-beral says: “So here we are all arguing about how an MP, who was wasting taxpayer dollars by being part of a group deliberately delaying the governmental process, and she is crying out as a victim?
Simply put, if that idiot did her job she wouldn't have been injured.”

LIE-beral IGNORES the damage being done to our democracy by an arrogant prime minster who has NO MORE than about 30 percent support in our population-because over FIFTY FIVE PERCENT of Cdns are so disgusted by parliament that they did not vote at all-leaving about 30 Cdns out of every hundred to be BOUGHT by LIE-berals! Yes-LIE-beral supporters are virtually ALL Working Family civil service Hogs and their hangers on and the moment LIE-berlas stop paying them bribes they will stop voting LIE-beral and will switch to whomever WILL give them the gravy they THINK they deserve! THIS IS NOT a great groundswell of support for LIE-beral efforts to muzzle opposition and change Cdn law and precedent! And LIE-berals should NOT be taking pride in running up THIRTY BILLION DOLLAR DEFICITS in order to dredge up enough cash to BRIBE their allies and stay in power!


LIE-beral says: “ What baffles me is how people who try to sound smart always lack common sense.
I say “HEY-that goes for LIE-berals trying to RIG the system in their favour and it goes for LIE-berals who don’t think their shit stinks when it CLEARLY DOES”!

Poor foolish LIE-beral finishes up with this TWISTED CRAP: “P.S. I AM CANADIAN and don't support leaders who want to make me American”.

And LIE-beral went on with this “..And it's always been Tory PM's who have kissed the asses of presidents over the decades..... Liberal PMs have never bowed down to US presidents. Like all your stupid posts, this point too is lame and weak. You're an imbecile....again.

I say: its GRAND to be a LIE-beral since you can say anything you want with NO NEED to refer to truth or reality! LIE-beral prime minsters ruled Canada for 70 of the last 100 years of the 20th century-YES- a succession of LIE-beral prime ministers did their level best to make Canada into a part of United States with endless sums of money handed out to Yankees to persuade them to build branch plants here-nothing like a branch plant to give a quick and dirty fix to the economy!.

Old time LIE-berals were SO friendly with Yankees that when LIE-beral prime minister Mackenzie King retired he did so courtesy of a LIFETIME PENSION supplied by the Roosevelt family in thanks for his life long friendship with the USA! And you can find that in the biography of Winston Churchill written by SIR Martin Gilbert-knighted for that precise and detailed biography.

And what of that famous LIE-beral C.D. Howe-known to Cdns as “The Minister of Everything” because he had his fingers in so many pies! Good old C.D. used to spend weekends hob-nobbing in the 1940`s in places like Marthas Vinyard with the Roosevelts and Vanderbilts and Rothschilds and Morgans-ROBBER BARONS all in the old style! And there was our minister of everything scarfing up the champagne and caviar and asking “how are the wife and kids.....and what PART OF CANADA can we SELL you this time around”!

LIE-berals used to OPENLY BOAST of their business connections but once revolutionary communist Pierre Trudeau came along and subverted the party into tax happy deficit driving imbeciles they lost their cozy relations with business people....but they did NOT loose their taste nor their SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT for caviar and champagne!!! Yes, LIE-berals used to have some common sense before the Trudopes came along and they used to be smart enough to handle our most important trading partner in a sensible way....how sad those days are gone in a haze of still not legal weed smoke!

And the final words should come from self professed and staunch LIE-beral supporter Peter Newman who wrote that book “When the Gods changed”-in which Newman details the fall of the LIE-beral party after Chretien retired. Newman-that “staunch LIE-beral friend” tells us the LIE-berals no longer stand for anything and have lost their way” and then he quotes various LIE-berals as PROOF of his `lie-beral lost lamb` philosophy!. No values, no morals, no party philosophy....except this one: THEY BELIEVE THEY ARE ENTITLED TO BE IN CHARGE!

Since that is what a LIE-beral FRIEND like Newman say of the party it is no surprise that others who are footing the damned bills for the pack of grossly entitled, sometimes violent and always arrogant LIE-berals should be rather less complimentary!
 
JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
petros said:
Both make me sad for the future of my grandchildren.
Click to expand...


Probably, but at least Trump isn't everybody's "Yes man"!

spilledthebeer said:
Is it not amusing what a selfish slanted view LIE-berals have of the `elbowgate scandal` in which our prime minister-the Boy with nice hair-for Brains cursed and swore at other MP`s and man-handled them and accidentally STRUCK a female MP who had the temerity Not to get out of the way fast enough!

And how sad is it that LIE-berals have FORGOTTEN their former favorite parliamentary disrupter-the wretched `Tequila Sheila/She LIED Sheila/AKA Sheila Copps and her `rat pack gang of loud and OBNOXIOUS clowns`! Hooting and roaring, jumping over desks to get at people to harass them and generally cutting up FAR WORSE than a pack of NDP MP`s simply standing in an aisle way DISCUSSING how and why Our brainless Boy was trying-YET AGAIN-to DAMAGE and LIMIT Cdn democracy by cutting into the discussion time needed to review contentious new bills!
Click to expand...


Is ANY party head and shoulders above another? I don't think so! They are all politicians...................by and large a pretty sleazy bunch. (One possible exception Allan J. MacEachen) N.D.P. is possibly a little superior morally, but not an inkling about handling money.
 
B00Mer

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
Twila said:
oh dear.



Under Trump, a majority of Canadians dislike the U.S. for the first time in 35 years, likely much longer
https://www.thestar.com/news/world/...irst-time-in-35-years-likely-much-longer.html


Canadians' view of U.S. deteriorated under Trump: global survey | CTV News


Canada's Opinion of America Hits All-time Low Under Trump: Poll
Click to expand...

Can't respect a Trumptard... it's almost a religion to some of these clowns..

What's funny is people like Walter are obsessed with Trump, a guy that claims to be religious, white and rich.. so all his wrongs are washed away, like the fact that he is an adulterous fat pig..

So the religious supporters are just hypocrites, or are not very religious themselves.. ;)
 
S

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
JLM said:
Probably, but at least Trump isn't everybody's "Yes man"!




Is ANY party head and shoulders above another? I don't think so! They are all politicians...................by and large a pretty sleazy bunch. (One possible exception Allan J. MacEachen) N.D.P. is possibly a little superior morally, but not an inkling about handling money.
Click to expand...

Oh my! YOU ARE DREAMING! In TECHNICOLOUR! NDP are kissing cousins to LIE-berals - with NDP being the less intelligent and less cunning of the bunch!

Consider the hypocrisy of Jagmeet Singh- one of those vying to lead the federal NDP:


Here is another article illustrating how NDP values are being poisoned for that sake of votes. With some comments of my own in brackets):

Jagmeet Singh should denounce the niqab.

BY TAREK FATAH, TORONTO SUN.
FIRST POSTED: TUESDAY, AUGUST 29, 2017 05:10 PM EDT | UPDATED: TUESDAY, AUGUST 29, 2017 05:15 PM EDT

Federal NDP leadership contender Jagmeet Singh may never have heard of Dr. Nawal El Saadawi, an Egyptian author and the country’s leading women's rights activist.

Had Singh read El Saadawi or any other progressive Muslim women among the world’s one billion Muslims - like Britain’s Yasmin Ali-Bhai Brown or Pakistan’s UN Rapporteur on Human Rights, Asma Jahangir - he would perhaps not have made the absurd claim that defending the niqab was, as he told the Toronto Star, showing “solidarity with Muslim Canadians who may feel targeted by legislation on religious clothing.”

An orthodox Sikh, Singh made the absurd claim that those who oppose medieval face masks -niqab or burka- were contributing to Islamophobia..

(I suggest that Cdns do not really care much what Muslim women wear in public- if they want to cover themselves in a sack I guess its their business- and in an age where skin cancer is a rising danger, being covered like that might even be a good thing? The Cdn beef is that Muslims refuse to remove the sack at critical times- such as when testifying in court or at citzenship ceremonies are at airport security checks where verified identity is critical. There was even a case of a Montreal Muslim student who refused to show her ears so her college prof could verify she was not wearing ear phones suitable for cheating on the test she was scheduled to write- with the prof having previously WARNED all students that such methods of cheating had been tried in the past and he intended to be vigilant against such deception in future!)

A fortnight before Singh defended the niqab as a human right of Muslim women, Egypt’s Nawal El Saadawi told a conference in Tangiers, Morocco, that far from being a human right, the niqab is just another form of tyranny.

Speaking about male guardianship, El Saadawi said, women fear divorce if they didn’t follow the commands of their husbands, but in fact, “divorce will set you free.”

(Various scholars have examined the Quran and have suggested that the Burqa is a relatively modern idea and one that is not necessarily critical to Muslim values- the burqa has apparently gone in and out of fashio in carious decades and centuries. Thus we ARE entitled to demand that the burqa be removed at times where precise identification is required!)

Calling for a change in the education of girls, she said: “There can be no tyrannical husband anywhere in the world, unless his wife enables his tyranny.”

Singh would have benefited tremendously if he had been there. He could still catch up by listening to progressive Muslim women, rather than Islamists with an anti-Western agenda.

(OH but Singh might lose votes by listening to such progressive Muslim women- ones that hard line Muslims dismiss as having bene poisoned by western style slut life!)

Closer to his own politics of the left, he should pay attention to the German Green Party parliamentarian Elkin Deligöz, a Muslim who received death threats in 2006 after urging Muslim women in Germany to take off their veils.

Deligöz, who was born in Turkey but grew up in Germany, again addressed Muslim women on this issue in a recent newspaper article, saying: “Wake up to today’s Germany. This is where you live, so take off your veils.”

(Oh great-there is the scale and scope of Muslim radical thought- that a woman born in Muslim Turkey and raised in that country where the burqa is optional- can still face death threats for urging Muslim women to behave like Turkish Muslim women! Just how twisted is the Muslim view of women? And should we expect Muslims in Turkey to start the usual sectarian violence over the lack of burqas on Turkish women? After all, Muslims do like to strike at the West but they seem to enjoy hitting at each other even more!)

Also in 2006, in Sweden, the country’s minister of integration, Nyamko Sabuni, a Muslim immigrant from Burundi, called for a ban on the niqab for girls under 15 (the Swedish age of consent).

Many Muslim groups were predictably outraged and wanted her dismissed, accusing her of being an Islamophobe.

(And this is another fine example-Swedish this time- of why Muslims are not suited to citizenship in any western country as their values make them utterly incompatible with us!)

Since then, the Islamists and their non-Muslim allies on the left have banded together to silence Muslim women and position their rights as secondary to so-called “community rights.”

And in the dark alleys of ethnoreligious, vote-bank politics, guess who leads these communities?

(It is a great example of how thoroughly LIE-berals have BOUGHT votes that they can get away with moving thousands of Muslim immigrants into a country without the female half of the country rising in RAGE at the prospect of being reduced to third class citizen status! In many places Muslim women are not allwoed to drive, not allowed to work, not allowed to go to school, not allowed even out of the house without male permission and not allowed out without a male escort! And our feminists are apparently not worried about their right under a LIE-beral/Muslim govt?)

It’s the orthodox and ultra-right wing conservative religious clergy, steeped in medievalism, who nonetheless receive political cover from their allies on the vote-hungry Left.

I suggest Singh talk to Quebec Muslim politician and former speaker Fatima Houda-Pepin, or author Djemila Benhabib. They may not be able to guarantee the Muslim vote bank in Ontario, but they will share the truth that covering a woman’s head or face is not a requirement of the Qur’an.

(Neither craven Cdn politicians nor radical Muslims wish to hear the opinions of apostate Muslim women whose minds have been poisoned by what radical Muslims refer to as Western SLUTS!)

Or perhaps Singh will listen to a fellow Sikh, Indian journalist Tavleen Singh, who once wrote: “There is a bizarre camaraderie between Godless Marxists and violently religious Islamists. … It is time for the rest of us to speak up. Time to say loudly: not in my country, not in my name. India is not an Islamic Republic and hopefully will never be, so anyone enforcing half-understood Sharia laws should be sent straight to jail.”
 
S

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
DaSleeper said:
Leftards cry so much about trump that they are sure to suffer from Hyponatremia......
Click to expand...

Its true- LIE-berals have so much hate directed towards Yankees it is making them dizzy! Consider:

Here is an article illustrating how diligently Cdn LIE-berals are working to sabotage NAFTA. The sad fact is that Our idiot Boy Justin and his LIE-beral pals are so hostile to Yankees generally and to Trump specifically that they are deliberately ignoring the real problem that Trump is trying to deal with- that of the tens of thousands of totally undocumented illegal aliens flooding into Canada. Trump and his people are hugely concerned that terror cells will be setting up shop in Canada while Cdn LIE-berals ignore them! Trump has quietly and carefully linked trade, open borders and national security into a package while LIE-berals ignore real concerns! LIE-berals intend that Yankees should be responsible for national security on BOTH SIDES of the border- and yet hypocrite LIE-berals are vexed that Yankees do not show `proper` respect for Cdn `culture` and sovereignty! With some comments of my own in brackets):

Canada’s NAFTA objectives include new ‘progressive’ chapters.

ANDY BLATCHFORD, THE CANADIAN PRESS. FIRST POSTED: MONDAY, AUGUST 14, 2017 11:00 AM EDT | UPDATED: MONDAY, AUGUST 14, 2017 11:46 AM EDT

Related Stories: With NAFTA, the Americans will be playing hardball.

(And why not? With 3000 dead in the World Trade Centre, plus hundreds more dead in various terror attacks, why should they not be concerned about Muslim terror?)

Trudeau says criticism over social issues in NAFTA talks shows Conservatives just don't get it.

(OH there is Our hypocrite Boy in full on FOOL MODE! He thinks trade is about social issues? Rather than jobs and money? And he IGNORES the reality that an open border cannot be kept open in the long term UNLESS Canada seriously steps up its vetting of security risks related to immigrants!)

OTTAWA — Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland is laying out Canada’s core objectives for the upcoming renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement.

In a speech Monday, Freeland shared a half-dozen NAFTA goals — including opening up access to government procurement rights, more professional movement, defending Canadian rights to supply management and reform of the investor-state dispute settlement process.

(Freeland is deluding us- but not fooling the Yankees! Why should Yankee procurement rights be any more lax than the Cdn versions? And professional movement of experts across the border is all very well- IF LIE-berals can GURANTEE that non of those traveling to United States are terrorists! It would also help if LIE-berals could guarantee that non of those Cdns traveling to the States are not actually working for Chinese, Iranian or North Korean military or corporate entities engaged in industrial espionage at Yankee expense!)

“In all these discussions, we will come to the table with goodwill, and Canada’s characteristic ability and willingness to seek compromise and find win-win solutions,” she said.

“But we are committed to a good deal, not just any deal.”

(For LIE-berals a good deal is defined as one where they get to sneer at Yankees and to hell with worried Cdns whose jobs are on the line!)

She is also calling for new “progressive” elements in NAFTA 2.0: stronger labour standards, tougher environmental protection provisions as well as chapters on gender and Indigenous rights.

(IN other words the LIE-beral position is based on a very thick smoke screen designed to STALL the negotiations until a terrorist event occurs with ties to Canada and Trump loses patience and dumps the deal so that LIE-berals can tell us “it was not their fault”!)

On that front, Canadian negotiators plan to use Canada’s recently negotiated trade agreement with the European Union as a reference, Freeland said.

“Progressive elements are also important if you want a free-trade deal that’s also a fair-trade deal,” Freeland said in a question-and-answer session following the speech at University of Ottawa.

(Oh right- the bankrupt Europeans are currently tearing themselves to pieces over economics, Carbon crap and trade scams and the sort of unrestricted immigration that Cdn LIE-berals want to see here! This is not progressive thought- it is PIG HEADED LIE-beral ARROGANCE!)

Canada’s positions will also include work to maintain key elements of the 23-year-old deal, including the process to ensure anti-dumping and countervailing duties are only applied when truly warranted.

(LIE-berals could resolve the dairy and softwood lumber troubles in a heartbeat simply by tightening up Cdn security! Why should we have to turn to the FBI to protect us when Muslim NUTS want to derail a VIA train off Highland Creek Bridge or when a radicalized Cdn goof builds a bomb and Cdn cops need FBI tips to catch the goof?)

Ottawa’s negotiating team will sit down with their American and Mexican counterparts Wednesday in Washington for the first round of talks.

Last month, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer released the Trump administration’s set of priorities for the NAFTA talks.

During the question and answer session, Freeland said she believes Canada and its NAFTA partners can find common ground on new chapters for labour, the environment, gender and Indigenous rights.

But she also warned that Canadians should brace for some tense exchanges during the NAFTA talks, in general.

(Yes- there should be some quite tense exchanges as LIE-berals taunt Trump and try to see how far they can goad him!)

“I think we all do need to be prepared for some moments of drama,” she said. “We should just see that as an expected part of any trade negotiations.”

Canada’s 10 NAFTA demands

Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland released Canada’s list of key demands Monday for a new North American Free Trade Agreement as talks get set to begin in Washington later this week.

Freeland’s list, which is much shorter than the U.S. wish list of more than 100 items, includes:

— A new chapter on labour standards. The original NAFTA included a labour section as an addendum, inserted into the agreement after Bill Clinton was elected and insisted on a few changes. Some officials in Canada and the U.S. have identified a goal of tougher labour rules: Increasing Mexican wages, to make auto plants in the other countries more affordable.

(And who will pay for this Mexican wage deal? The answer is NOBODY! Higher cost Mexican car parts means higher sales of Japanese and Korean cars- with corresponding reductions in Mexican sales! Do not bankrupt Mexicans have enough trouble without LIE-berals trying to screw with their economy?)

— A new chapter on environmental standards. This was also added as an afterthought to the original NAFTA, placed there after Clinton’s election. Freeland says she wants a chapter that ensures no country can weaken environmental protection to attract investment. She also says it should support efforts against climate change.

(OH right- I guess rules on environmental standards will work nicely in bankrupt and corrupt Mexico? How do LIE-berals expect to enforce that amidst Mexican lawlessness and chaos?)

—A new chapter on gender rights.

(Gender rights? Just a red herring designed to raise Trump blood pressure!)

—A new chapter on Indigenous rights.

(Indigenous rights? Maybe LIE-berals should workj on drug abuse and rampant corruption on Cdn reserves before they get excited about lecturing Yankees?)

—Reforms to the investor-state dispute settlement process. Specifically, Freeland referred to Chapter 11 — which involves companies suing governments. She said she wants reforms so that “governments have an unassailable right to regulate in the public interest.” This is not to be confused with Chapter 19, which regulates disputes between companies over dumping, in cases like softwood lumber, and which the U.S. administration might seek to eliminate.

LIE-berals want to monkey with Chapter 11? So they can prove that LIE-berals can suck and blow at the same time? LIE-berals do not have the stable state of mind necessary to maintain any deal over long period without seriously eroding it with new rules and altered policies!)

—Expand procurement. For years, Canada has wanted to kill Buy American rules for construction projects at the state and local level. It could be a tough sell. U.S. lawmakers are demanding even more Buy American rules, which is something President Donald Trump campaigned on. Freeland said: “Local-content provisions for major government contracts are political junk food: superficially appetizing, but unhealthy in the long run.”

(With the added bonus that Buy Quebec rules are as bad as anything Yankees have on the books- and LIE-berals will not spank cheeky Quebecers for fear of losing votes!)

—Freer movement of professionals. NAFTA includes a list of professions where people can easily get a visa to work across the border. It’s an old list — it mentions land surveyors and range conservationists, but not computer programmers. International companies want this list expanded to make it easier for employees to move between offices.

(As previously stated- Yankees will allow easier movement IF Cdns tighten security- but LIE-berals will not do that- so this issue is DEAD! The other LIE-beral point set out below are merely a smoke screen designed to make the LIE-beral position look less outlandish than it is!)

—Protect Canada’s supply-management system for dairy and poultry. Canada does not have free trade in these areas, and regulates imports and prices.

—Protect cultural exemptions. Canada insisted on protections in the old agreement for cultural industries, like publishing and broadcasting. The U.S.’s annual report on international trade barriers lists this as an irritant.

—Maintaining a process to regulate anti-dumping and countervailing disputes, like the one over softwood lumber. Freeland noted that Canada briefly walked out of the original talks in 1987, as this was a deal-breaker. The U.S. says it now wants to get rid of the resulting Chapter 19. Some observers say it might simply
 
JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
bluebyrd35 said:
Ah so ........I assume you feel the majority of Canadians are unintelligent?? I haven't come across one person who is even neutral about Trump never mind prefers him.

https://www.thestar.com/news/world/...n-hot-mic-say-theyre-worried-about-trump.html
Click to expand...


You're hanging out in the wrong circles! :)

spilledthebeer said:
Its true- LIE-berals have so much hate directed towards Yankees it is making them dizzy! Consider:
Click to expand...


What you see above is all I could bother to read! Why waste so much of your time?
 
C

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Trudeau may be an embarrassment to some Canadians but Trump is an embarrassment to humanity. The guy is a complete narcissistic moron and it baffles 90% of humanity why some haven't figured that out yet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom