Canadian gun rights.

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Yeah you would like that......

(doesn't say much for you though...)



Doesn't matter much to me, I'm grandfathered for prohibited military weapons.........my choice shown above (in semi-auto)
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Maybe the problem is that the semi-auto's you find are just not enough of a deterrent to stop crime. Put an automatic assault rifle in every home like the Swiss do,
...along with proper training...
and bang, the crime rate drops like a rock. It's a kind of MAD approach. You mess with me, and I'll change you into Swiss cheese (pardon the pun).
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
So why is Switzerland not in perpetual civil war, as it ought to be according to your theory?
I'll reiterate that:
Risus, why is Switzerland not rife with gun violence if it all hinges on availability?
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
I'll reiterate that:
Risus, why is Switzerland not rife with gun violence if it all hinges on availability?

Oh, give him a break, AnnaG. Do you honestly think rifles are so available in Switzerland? Think about it for a moment. If your rifle is in basement, and you decide to rob a bank, it's not like you can just walk out the door and rob the bank. You have to go all the way down to the basement first. And then there's the issue of hiding your rifle in public. After all, we're not talking about a pistol, but an automatic assault rifle.
 

bobnoorduyn

Council Member
Nov 26, 2008
2,262
28
48
Mountain Veiw County
That is easy. Guns are brought in from jurisdictions which have no gun control. Gun control must cover the entire nation for it to be effective. Guns are smuggled into Canada from USA. But since they have to cross the border, there is at least some check on gun imports into Canada. There is absolutely no check on somebody traveling from Virginia ro DC. He may bring in a car trunk full of guns and nobody will question him.

Gun control in isolated pockets like DC or NY is totally meaningless.

Ain't going to happen, I live within spitting distance of two large container terminals where a whopping 3% of containers are scruitinzed. Everything you can imagine, including human cargo can and does get in. Stolen vehicles get out. The firearms most exported, imported, used either for good and bad, come not from the US of A, but from Russia or China. The Kalashnikov or it's knockoff made by Norinco, either the '47 or and smaller calibre '74, are still the most popular and easily accessable firearms available. And yes, you can get them here.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
First of all, I could hardly have been cherry picking, as it was not me that choose North Dakota as an example.

I will grant it was a bad choice, as ND has the lowest murder rate in the USA.

But my point still stands......ND also has practically no gun control, is a "shall issue" state, allows "assault" weapons, has no background checks, licensing, or registration, permits high capacity magazines.....

According to the gun control people, you should not be able to step across the border into ND without tripping over bodies and empty casings......not so.


see the thread Gun Control is completely useless
And it is not alone....the north western states of the USA enjoy very high proportion of gun ownership (the highest in the USA is Wyoming), practically no gun control in the Canadian sense (no licensing, certainly no registration, handguns and semi-auto military rifles included). They also enjoy substantially and consistently lower murder rates than the Canadian provinces right across the border.......

That should simply be impossible according to the logic of those that celebrate restrictive gun laws...

Cherry picking?? Yes....to an extent.....yet you have to admit it is quite a coherent example....it points to the truth that murder rates are dependent on other factors much more than gun control.

BTW, you are incorrect in your figures....in 2007, North Dakota experienced a blip in the murder rate.....1.9 per 100,000. That is not "eight times what it had in 2008", it is 4 times.........the highest rate there ever, according to my stats.....and exactly the same as the rate in Canada.

Actually I understood from the article below that ND had 2 gun deaths in 2008 and 16 in 2007. That works out to 8 times. Iguess it depends on whose figures you believe. I was using a North Dakota newspaper, however.

North Dakota murder rate down to two in '08

It is interesting to note that in Canada most of the gun death murders are performed with guns that are illegal; namely the huge number of guns smuggled into Canada from poorly regulated states like Georgia. In other words the lack of firearms regulations in the USA has a direct bearing on gun crimes in Canada. In Mexico the situation is even worse with something like 90% of all illegal firearms coming from the USA.

Feature Focus: The Illegal Firearms Market in Canada

US guns fuel Canada and Mexico crimes, UK gun crime remains rare
 

bobnoorduyn

Council Member
Nov 26, 2008
2,262
28
48
Mountain Veiw County
I see. so are you saying that your Harper government in Canada is committing crimes on a wholesale scale which are not counted and that is screwing up the statistics? That if we included the crimes committed by Harper government, it will actually show that murder rate in Canada is higher than that of USA? Well, you may have a point there.

I'm surprised you ever made it through school without getting kicked out. I never in any breath mentioned Harper, I never even identified a particular government. But if you look at history, and not your myopic view of it, you will see that most atrocities committed against citizens were done by their own governments. China, Russia, Cuba, you name it, do not list execution of political prisoners as crimes, duh!


You should know Harper better than I do. You are a conservative, I am not.

Well, a friend of my wife's is friends with Laureen, that's about how well I know Stephen. I also never said I was a conservative, per se. If anything I would be a classical liberal, or liberal conservative, or libertarian. You on the other hand are anything but liberal in any true sense of the word, something our federal Liberal party is not either.

Germany and France do have strcit gun control, and it does work out well for them. Compare crime rate in Germany, France and USA. Or are you saying again that French and German governments are committing murders wholesale and if those are counted, it will show they they have a higher murder rate than that of USA?

I can't speak to Germany however, all you need in France now is a postal address. You don't even need to live there, that is how Brits are getting firearms. But you must have been born yesterday to have not known what France and Germany had in the past. Germany severely ristricted firearms ownership before kristallnacht and beyond. The met with little or no resistance. France also had a firearms registry so the soldiers knew exactly who to target. What they did at the time was perfectly legal by their standards.

So are you saying that Canada is menaced by Brown shirts? You you really believe your own rhetoric?

Not yet. Do you really believe that the government will make you happy and keep you safe? A real history lesson may cost you, and us, dearly if we have to re live it.
 

bobnoorduyn

Council Member
Nov 26, 2008
2,262
28
48
Mountain Veiw County
Well, your dream may be to get rid of all the gun control in Canada, to turn it into a carbon copy of USA. But fortunately a majority of Canadians don't share that dream (or nightmare). Majority of Canadians support gun control.

I have never said that, and for your information there is nowhere in the USA totally devoid of gun control except for the criminal element.
 

bobnoorduyn

Council Member
Nov 26, 2008
2,262
28
48
Mountain Veiw County
So, you are saying that Canada, and it's citizens, are on the road to a communist or fascist state. That gun control is just one more step towards that goal.

Come on Bear, comments like that, along with the brown shirt comment is fear mongering plain and simple. If you or Bob are reduced to using the brown shirt or red menace card, it means you have no comprehensive argument to support your position.

Ger, read your history, success at 100% arms control, (except for the followers of the regime of course) has preceeded totalitarianism 100% of the time, genocide often follows. It goes back millennia to feudal Japan, China, Mongolia, Rome, Europe... Look to recent history at places like Soviet Russia, Germany, China, North Korea, (or the euphemistically named Democratic Peoples' Republic of Korea), Uganda, Rwanda, Ethiopia... And I'm willing to bet a paycheque that the citizens of these countries also were adamant it would never happen to them.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
He does come across as intelligent though. I get the impression that he's not that ignorant, but rather just too lazy or prejudiced to restrain himself from cheap shots at another country as a means of arguing without having to dig up a bunch of facts.

I don't get the impression he's so stupid as to actually believe what he writes here, but rather that he's just trying to be manipulative, though it irritates me just as much if not more so. Ignorance can be forgiven. Willful manipulation is, well, willful, intentional, premeditated.

Absolutely - some people are brilliant when it comes to getting knowledge out of books, but when it comes to common sense or being socially adept, they are dumber than a bag of f******g hammers. :lol:
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Actually I understood from the article below that ND had 2 gun deaths in 2008 and 16 in 2007. That works out to 8 times. Iguess it depends on whose figures you believe. I was using a North Dakota newspaper, however.

North Dakota murder rate down to two in '08

It is interesting to note that in Canada most of the gun death murders are performed with guns that are illegal; namely the huge number of guns smuggled into Canada from poorly regulated states like Georgia. In other words the lack of firearms regulations in the USA has a direct bearing on gun crimes in Canada. In Mexico the situation is even worse with something like 90% of all illegal firearms coming from the USA.

Feature Focus: The Illegal Firearms Market in Canada

US guns fuel Canada and Mexico crimes, UK gun crime remains rare

Hmmm....speaking of cherry picking.....

One of my pet peeves is the use of "gun murder" statistics.......they are a complete red herring. If the anti-gun forces believe taking my weapons away will lower the murder rate.......then they must demonstrate that there is not simply a move to other weapons.....

I mean, it seems blatantly obvious.....if someone decides to kill someone, and they have available a kitchen knife, a can of gasoline and a match, a baseball bat, a golf club, my car, a cast iron frying pan, a rock, a sword, and a 12 gauge shotgun.........one will generally use the 12 gauge shotgun. Now....to be justified in your claim that the restriction of the availability of the shotgun will stop killing, you need to demonstrate that one won't simply complete the act with one of the other tools available.....

And that is a very difficult task.......considering most of Canada's murders are committed without guns......
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Incredible. And yet one more thread on guns. Are people that lazy they can't use the search function? Or that stupid they think we haven't discussed this at length before?
If people want to ban something, ban criminals. Guns are around and always will be as long as we have criminals. And its immensely moronic to subject the majority of gunowners to laws that are ineffective at doing what they are supposed to do.