Are you that thick too? The fewer guns around means that fewer people will have access to weapons. Its not rocket science.
I stated why that's not the case before....re Britain.
Are you that thick too? The fewer guns around means that fewer people will have access to weapons. Its not rocket science.
Yeah you would like that......
(doesn't say much for you though...)
There are no accidents with firearms?That is true, but accidents happen. Shooting someone with a gun is not an accident. Smarten up.
...along with proper training...Maybe the problem is that the semi-auto's you find are just not enough of a deterrent to stop crime. Put an automatic assault rifle in every home like the Swiss do,
and bang, the crime rate drops like a rock. It's a kind of MAD approach. You mess with me, and I'll change you into Swiss cheese (pardon the pun).
I'll reiterate that:So why is Switzerland not in perpetual civil war, as it ought to be according to your theory?
...along with proper training...
I'll reiterate that:
Risus, why is Switzerland not rife with gun violence if it all hinges on availability?
Why would we do that? You would be even further from the mark then Colpy.
That is easy. Guns are brought in from jurisdictions which have no gun control. Gun control must cover the entire nation for it to be effective. Guns are smuggled into Canada from USA. But since they have to cross the border, there is at least some check on gun imports into Canada. There is absolutely no check on somebody traveling from Virginia ro DC. He may bring in a car trunk full of guns and nobody will question him.
Gun control in isolated pockets like DC or NY is totally meaningless.
First of all, I could hardly have been cherry picking, as it was not me that choose North Dakota as an example.
I will grant it was a bad choice, as ND has the lowest murder rate in the USA.
But my point still stands......ND also has practically no gun control, is a "shall issue" state, allows "assault" weapons, has no background checks, licensing, or registration, permits high capacity magazines.....
According to the gun control people, you should not be able to step across the border into ND without tripping over bodies and empty casings......not so.
see the thread Gun Control is completely useless
And it is not alone....the north western states of the USA enjoy very high proportion of gun ownership (the highest in the USA is Wyoming), practically no gun control in the Canadian sense (no licensing, certainly no registration, handguns and semi-auto military rifles included). They also enjoy substantially and consistently lower murder rates than the Canadian provinces right across the border.......
That should simply be impossible according to the logic of those that celebrate restrictive gun laws...
Cherry picking?? Yes....to an extent.....yet you have to admit it is quite a coherent example....it points to the truth that murder rates are dependent on other factors much more than gun control.
BTW, you are incorrect in your figures....in 2007, North Dakota experienced a blip in the murder rate.....1.9 per 100,000. That is not "eight times what it had in 2008", it is 4 times.........the highest rate there ever, according to my stats.....and exactly the same as the rate in Canada.
I see. so are you saying that your Harper government in Canada is committing crimes on a wholesale scale which are not counted and that is screwing up the statistics? That if we included the crimes committed by Harper government, it will actually show that murder rate in Canada is higher than that of USA? Well, you may have a point there.
You should know Harper better than I do. You are a conservative, I am not.
Germany and France do have strcit gun control, and it does work out well for them. Compare crime rate in Germany, France and USA. Or are you saying again that French and German governments are committing murders wholesale and if those are counted, it will show they they have a higher murder rate than that of USA?
So are you saying that Canada is menaced by Brown shirts? You you really believe your own rhetoric?
Well, your dream may be to get rid of all the gun control in Canada, to turn it into a carbon copy of USA. But fortunately a majority of Canadians don't share that dream (or nightmare). Majority of Canadians support gun control.
So, you are saying that Canada, and it's citizens, are on the road to a communist or fascist state. That gun control is just one more step towards that goal.
Come on Bear, comments like that, along with the brown shirt comment is fear mongering plain and simple. If you or Bob are reduced to using the brown shirt or red menace card, it means you have no comprehensive argument to support your position.
He does come across as intelligent though. I get the impression that he's not that ignorant, but rather just too lazy or prejudiced to restrain himself from cheap shots at another country as a means of arguing without having to dig up a bunch of facts.
I don't get the impression he's so stupid as to actually believe what he writes here, but rather that he's just trying to be manipulative, though it irritates me just as much if not more so. Ignorance can be forgiven. Willful manipulation is, well, willful, intentional, premeditated.
Actually I understood from the article below that ND had 2 gun deaths in 2008 and 16 in 2007. That works out to 8 times. Iguess it depends on whose figures you believe. I was using a North Dakota newspaper, however.
North Dakota murder rate down to two in '08
It is interesting to note that in Canada most of the gun death murders are performed with guns that are illegal; namely the huge number of guns smuggled into Canada from poorly regulated states like Georgia. In other words the lack of firearms regulations in the USA has a direct bearing on gun crimes in Canada. In Mexico the situation is even worse with something like 90% of all illegal firearms coming from the USA.
Feature Focus: The Illegal Firearms Market in Canada
US guns fuel Canada and Mexico crimes, UK gun crime remains rare