Contradicting evidence that occurs after the original investigation is of extreme importance. It means that all the decisions (Canadian or any other country) made in response to 9/11 may be brought into question. This involves invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan - and is therefore a very serious matter.
Canadian 9/11 Petition for Parliament
- Thread starter darkbeaver
- Start date
The evidence didn't occur after the original investigation. Nutters came out of the woodwork before the dust even settled. Their "evidence" was either refuted or (like the free fall speed shtick) so ridiculous it couldn't be seriously called evidence,
Actually, the official 911 report did not mention Tower 7. This would not be a refutation, since it was not addressed.
Have a look at the 47 storey building collapsing in 6 seconds.
YouTube - wtc tower 7 high resolution collapse footage: clip 2
Have a look at the 47 storey building collapsing in 6 seconds.
YouTube - wtc tower 7 high resolution collapse footage: clip 2
The nutters literally came out of the media woodwork like a stampede of termites all broadcasting the details of the guilty parties and their
cult leader OBL. One of the finest pieces of television journalism in a time of crisis that anyone can remember and so quickly and professionally crafted under extreme pressure at a time of dire national need. I hope they've been awarded.
cult leader OBL. One of the finest pieces of television journalism in a time of crisis that anyone can remember and so quickly and professionally crafted under extreme pressure at a time of dire national need. I hope they've been awarded.
It didn't collapse in six second. It took 6 (actually 5 seconds) to drop behind the building in front. Why do you have to use trickery to try and prove your point?
If the evidence occurs after the event, the evidence could have nothing to do with the event.
Actually, the NIST evidence was there the whole time, it was made public after the event - when a lawsuit forced NIST to reveal it.
There is also this BBC report announcing the collapse of Tower 7. Only problem is, it can still be seen in the background.
BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell
There is also this BBC report announcing the collapse of Tower 7. Only problem is, it can still be seen in the background.
BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell
Dear God! Get a girlfriend already, and whatever you do, don't mention a word about this in her presence or you'll be working that palm till it looks like you have the hand of a grey man.
And stop listening to George Norry!
Give it up Beave. That's the third or fourth time you've tried to provoke me recently, and I haven't responded to any of them. That's the way it's going to be until you start saying something intelligent and intelligible.That's what you say but the evidence says that you don't know what you're talking about. Of course what's been most thoroughly and repeatedly debunked is your credibility and that you have accomplished all on your own. Attention to evidence is not paranoia, it is science, and that science condemns your opinion as absurd public relations rhetoric, yes nothing else but pulp spin from a jumbo econo bag. I'm a skeptic and you're a cracker eating parrot.
In any event, we're moving ahead with the 2011 petition.
Check out Canadian 9/11 Petition | The Petition For A Public Canadian 9/11 Investigation for the latest details and our facebook group.
Check out Canadian 9/11 Petition | The Petition For A Public Canadian 9/11 Investigation for the latest details and our facebook group.
You are finally paranoid Sinister, and you have inflated your position in my scheme of things out of all relation to reality. If you have nothing left why not just confess the obvious. You have nothing to fear but a big hug. I will shower first. ahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahhahhahahahah
Last edited:
It almost looked as if someone were using a cutting torch, but that can't be right, the terrorists couldn't have got off the plane with welding gear after it went into the building. Could they have?
I'm sorry I'm not educated and haven't been made aware of spontaneous dripping metal and naturally just reached for the familiar. Perhaps you could enlighten me about the other well known phenomena producing what looks like torch work. Volcanic building eruptions maybe?
The building is on fire...there's nothing spontaneous about it.
I don't think that looks like torch work. It only looks like torch work when the molten metal drips and is broken up by the air, kinda like how a water fall which is very high will break apart before the ground.
There has been some research on that (molten metal):
YouTube - A danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC dust ( english subtitles )
Some of you may have already seen this.
YouTube - A danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC dust ( english subtitles )
Some of you may have already seen this.