Canadian 9/11 Petition for Parliament

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
(sigh) For the reasons mentioned ad nauseum in other 9-11 threads, the controled demolition of the WTC towers is an obvious impossiblity.

Deal with it.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
I think the point is that Canada got snookered into a war based on 911 and if 1100 engineers and architects think there is something fishy about the official story, then it is in Canada's best interests to find out what the truth is. We have no business getting involved in wars based on lies.


And tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of engineers and architects don't think there's anything fishy.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
I think the point is that Canada got snookered into a war based on 911 and if 1100 engineers and architects think there is something fishy about the official story, then it is in Canada's best interests to find out what the truth is. We have no business getting involved in wars based on lies.

Well, just as it's not up to Canada to tell the US what to do (if it has a legitimate concern, that's what the UN is for), so it was not up to the US to tell Canada to go to war. Again, if it had a legitimate concern, Bush had done the right thing to bring the issue forward to the UN General Assembly. As it turns out, the General Assembly did approve of War in Afghanistan so as to capture Bin Laden (still on the loose), but disapproved of the war in Iraq on the grounds of insufficient evidence. Canada did the right thing not to go into Iraq. As for going into Afghanistan, well, at least the war was legal, though I'm still undecided as to it was wise for us to go in. But at least the first condition was met (that it be legal).
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 – specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and the collapse of the third World Trade Center Building 7.

How far exactly do you imagine that subpoena power reaches in Canada? We have no jurisdiction over anything related the WTC. Unless you think Canada was actively involved in anything related to those events, in which case, I would like to see a list of allegations and supporting evidence.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
I'm sure that had there been any serious suspicion over the destruction of the WTC buildings, that we would have heard about it from the highest levels of the international community. The fact that we haven't tells me that the evidence for some kind of conspiracy is still insufficient, and evidence of an untrustworthy investigation likewise is insufficient to warrant further investigation until further evidence comes to the fore.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
A few years ago a U.S. military transport jet crashed in Canada killing about two hundred American military personell. Canada did a complete investigation because it happened in Canada. I don't think Canada has any place digging inti something that happened in the U.S..
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
A few years ago a U.S. military transport jet crashed in Canada killing about two hundred American military personell. Canada did a complete investigation because it happened in Canada. I don't think Canada has any place digging inti something that happened in the U.S..

Bingo!

And had the US had an issue with Canada investigating that crash, it would not have been in the US' place to meddle so directly in Canada's affairs.

This is not to say that what occurs in a country might not have international repercussions. But if the US had any issue with that investigation, it would have been free to take up through the proper channels, but certainly not usurp the principle of the equality of nations before international laws.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Bingo!

And had the US had an issue with Canada investigating that crash, it would not have been in the US' place to meddle so directly in Canada's affairs.

This is not to say that what occurs in a country might not have international repercussions. But if the US had any issue with that investigation, it would have been free to take up through the proper channels, but certainly not usurp the principle of the equality of nations before international laws.
When Canadian transport officials finished their investigation they handed a very complete report to the Americans. I don't think the Americans had a single question
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
When Canadian transport officials finished their investigation they handed a very complete report to the Americans. I don't think the Americans had a single question

I like transparency. While I do not believe Canada would have had any obligation to hand a report to the US, seeing that the event had occurred on Canadian soil, its transparency does alleviate any suspicions and keeps conspiracy theorists away.

Looking at it that way, while the US should not have any obligation to provide Canada with information on the 9/11 incident, seeing that Canadians did die there, it would be good policy to make them publicly available for the same reason.
 

911petition

Nominee Member
Jan 8, 2011
77
0
6
I like transparency. While I do not believe Canada would have had any obligation to hand a report to the US, seeing that the event had occurred on Canadian soil, its transparency does alleviate any suspicions and keeps conspiracy theorists away.

Looking at it that way, while the US should not have any obligation to provide Canada with information on the 9/11 incident, seeing that Canadians did die there, it would be good policy to make them publicly available for the same reason.
There are likely large amounts of files on each of the 24 victims that were Canadian. For some reason these could be classified.
 

911petition

Nominee Member
Jan 8, 2011
77
0
6
Actually, we don't know what they think until we ask them. The surveys on this have been very interesting.

It has been shown that in surveys of people who are asked what they think before an AE 911 Truth presentation
and after, a very high percentage change their view once they see the evidence.

Actually, we don't know what they think until we ask them. The surveys on this have been very interesting.

It has been shown that in surveys of people who are asked what they think before an AE 911 Truth presentation
and after, a very high percentage change their view once they see the evidence.
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
141
63
Backwater, Ontario.
Hmmm. I guess I misread the context of your statement. I will rethink. :cool:


Nope, you got it right. bitter and twisted..........Libby is.a lesbian after all.?........AND a socialist..(can it get much worse).........JEEBUS, why can't everyone be good cons? think 1984,,,,,,,,,coming soon to a Canada near you.

Colpy, I believe you meant 'high dudgeon'.

What a completely pointless waste of time. 9/11 is an American event; as such, our Parliament has no business asking for a commission on truth. Setting aside, of course, the idea that there is no need for a commission; the truth was quite obvious to those who watched the events unfold.


Course it would be a great time waster, another smoke for the smoke and mirror bunch. Put this on the front burner with "why there's bears in Algonquin Park" or something.............true Canadian debate............think how long the cons could put off any debate on health care or offshoring with these pressing hotbutton items.(insert red S for sarcasm)
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Nope, you got it right. bitter and twisted..........Libby is.a lesbian after all.?........AND a socialist..(can it get much worse).........JEEBUS, why can't everyone be good cons? think 1984,,,,,,,,,coming soon to a Canada near you.




Course it would be a great time waster, another smoke for the smoke and mirror bunch. Put this on the front burner with "why there's bears in Algonquin Park" or something.............true Canadian debate............think how long the cons could put off any debate on health care or offshoring with these pressing hotbutton items.(insert red S for sarcasm)


This is a hot button that really is worth pushing though and that is glaringly obvious because of the national foot dragging to stay that finger of doom. A whole lot of nasty stuff went down since that day, and a whole lot of nasty people have profited. Powerful nasty people we don't need.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
It has been shown that in surveys of people who are asked what they think before an AE 911 Truth presentation
and after, a very high percentage change their view once they see the evidence.


I'm sure you'd see the exact same thing before and after a documentary on the Mayan 2012 end of the world thing.