BREAKING: We Just Discovered Who Issued The Warrant To Investigate Trump
- Thread starter Danbones
- Start date
Susan Rice’s White House Unmasking: A Watergate-style Scandal
Her interest was not in national security but to advance the political interests of the Democratic party. The thing to bear in mind is that the White House does not do investigations. Not criminal investigations, not intelligence investigations. Remember that.
Understand: There would have been no intelligence need for Susan Rice to ask for identities to be unmasked. If there had been a real need to reveal the identities — an intelligence need based on American interests — the unmasking would have been done by the investigating agencies. The national-security adviser is not an investigator.
She is a White House staffer. The president’s staff is a consumer of intelligence, not a generator or collector of it. If Susan Rice was unmasking Americans, it was not to fulfill an intelligence need based on American interests; it was to fulfill a political desire based on Democratic-party interests.
The FBI, CIA, and NSA generate or collect the intelligence in, essentially, three ways: conducting surveillance on suspected agents of foreign powers under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and carrying out more-sweeping collections under two other authorities — a different provision of FISA, and a Reagan-era executive order that has been amended several times over the ensuing decades, EO 12,333. As Director Comey explained, in answering questions posed by Representative Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.), those three agencies do collection, investigation, and analysis.
In general, they handle any necessary unmasking — which, due to the aforementioned privacy obsessiveness, is extremely rare. Unlike Democratic-party operatives whose obsession is vanquishing Republicans, the three agencies have to be concerned about the privacy rights of Americans. If they’re not, their legal authority to collect the intelligence — a vital national-security power — could be severely curtailed when it periodically comes up for review by Congress, as it will later this year.
Those three collecting agencies — FBI, CIA, and NSA — must be distinguished from other components of the government, such as the White House. Those other components, Comey elaborated, “are consumers of our products.” That is, they do not collect raw intelligence and refine it into useful reports — i.e., reports that balance informational value and required privacy protections. They read those reports and make policy recommendations based on them. White House staffers are not supposed to be in the business of controlling the content of the reports; they merely act on the reports. Thus, Comey added, these consumers “can ask the collectors to unmask.” But the unmasking authority “resides with those who collected the information.”
Of course, the consumer doing the asking in this case was not just any government official. We’re talking about Susan Rice. This was Obama’s right hand doing the asking. If she made an unmasking “request,” do you suppose anyone at the FBI, CIA, or NSA was going to say no? That brings us to three interesting points.
The first involves political intrusion into law enforcement — something that the White House is supposed to avoid. (You may remember that Democrats ran Bush attorney general Alberto Gonzales out of town over suspicions about it.)
As I have noted repeatedly, in publishing the illegally leaked classified information about former national-security adviser Michael Flynn’s communications with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, the New York Times informs us that “Obama advisers” and “Obama officials” were up to their eyeballs in the investigation: Obama advisers heard separately from the F.B.I. about Mr. Flynn’s conversation with Mr. Kislyak, whose calls were routinely monitored by American intelligence agencies that track Russian diplomats.
The Obama advisers grew suspicious that perhaps there had been a secret deal between the incoming team and Moscow, which could violate the rarely enforced, two-century-old Logan Act barring private citizens from negotiating with foreign powers in disputes with the United States. The Obama officials asked the F.B.I. if a quid pro quo had been discussed on the call, and the answer came back no, according to one of the officials, who like others asked not to be named discussing delicate communications. [Translation: “asked not to be named committing felony unauthorized disclosure of classified information.”] The topic of sanctions came up, they were told, but there was no deal. [Emphasis added.]
It appears very likely that Susan Rice was involved in the unmasking of Michael Flynn. Was she also monitoring the FBI’s investigation? Was she involved in the administration’s consideration of (bogus) criminal charges against Flynn? With the subsequent decision to have the FBI interrogate Flynn (or “grill” him, as the Times put it)?
The second point is that, while not a pillar of rectitude, Ms. Rice is not an idiot. Besides being shrewd, she was a highly involved, highly informed consumer of intelligence, and a key Obama political collaborator. Unlike the casual reader, she would have known who the Trump-team players were without needing to have their identities unmasked.
Do you really think her purpose in demanding that names be revealed was to enhance her understanding of intelligence about the activities and intentions of foreign targets? Seriously? I’m betting it was so that others down the dissemination chain could see the names of Trump associates — names the investigating agencies that originally collected the information had determined not to unmask.
Third, and finally, let’s consider the dissemination chain Rice had in mind. The most telling remark that former Obama deputy defense secretary Evelyn Farkas made in her now-infamous MSNBC interview was the throw-away line at the end: “That’s why you have all the leaking.” Put this in context: Farkas had left the Obama administration in 2015, subsequently joining the presidential campaign of, yes, Hillary Clinton — Trump’s opponent. She told MSNBC that she had been encouraging her former Obama-administration colleagues and members of Congress to seek “as much information as you can” from the intelligence community. “That’s why you have the leaking.”
To summarize: At a high level, officials like Susan Rice had names unmasked that would not ordinarily be unmasked. That information was then being pushed widely throughout the intelligence community in unmasked form . . . particularly after Obama, toward the end of his presidency, suddenly — and seemingly apropos of nothing — changed the rules so that all of the intelligence agencies (not just the collecting agencies) could have access to raw intelligence information.
As we know, the community of intelligence agencies leaks like a sieve, and the more access there is to juicy information, the more leaks there are. Meanwhile, former Obama officials and Clinton-campaign advisers, like Farkas, were pushing to get the information transferred from the intelligence community to members of Congress, geometrically increasing the likelihood of intelligence leaks.
By the way, have you noticed that there have been lots of intelligence leaks in the press? There’s an old saying in the criminal law: The best evidence of a conspiracy is success. The criminal law also has another good rule of thumb: Consciousness of guilt is best proved by false exculpatory statements.
That’s a genre in which Susan Rice has rich experience. Two weeks ago, she was asked in an interview about allegations by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R., Calif.) that the Obama administration had unmasked Trump-team members. “I know nothing about this,” Rice replied. “I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that count today.” Well, at least she didn’t blame it on a video.
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...aign-members-obama-administration-fbi-cia-nsa
Susan Rice
Her interest was not in national security but to advance the political interests of the Democratic party. The thing to bear in mind is that the White House does not do investigations. Not criminal investigations, not intelligence investigations. Remember that.
Understand: There would have been no intelligence need for Susan Rice to ask for identities to be unmasked. If there had been a real need to reveal the identities — an intelligence need based on American interests — the unmasking would have been done by the investigating agencies. The national-security adviser is not an investigator.
She is a White House staffer. The president’s staff is a consumer of intelligence, not a generator or collector of it. If Susan Rice was unmasking Americans, it was not to fulfill an intelligence need based on American interests; it was to fulfill a political desire based on Democratic-party interests.
The FBI, CIA, and NSA generate or collect the intelligence in, essentially, three ways: conducting surveillance on suspected agents of foreign powers under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and carrying out more-sweeping collections under two other authorities — a different provision of FISA, and a Reagan-era executive order that has been amended several times over the ensuing decades, EO 12,333. As Director Comey explained, in answering questions posed by Representative Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.), those three agencies do collection, investigation, and analysis.
In general, they handle any necessary unmasking — which, due to the aforementioned privacy obsessiveness, is extremely rare. Unlike Democratic-party operatives whose obsession is vanquishing Republicans, the three agencies have to be concerned about the privacy rights of Americans. If they’re not, their legal authority to collect the intelligence — a vital national-security power — could be severely curtailed when it periodically comes up for review by Congress, as it will later this year.
Those three collecting agencies — FBI, CIA, and NSA — must be distinguished from other components of the government, such as the White House. Those other components, Comey elaborated, “are consumers of our products.” That is, they do not collect raw intelligence and refine it into useful reports — i.e., reports that balance informational value and required privacy protections. They read those reports and make policy recommendations based on them. White House staffers are not supposed to be in the business of controlling the content of the reports; they merely act on the reports. Thus, Comey added, these consumers “can ask the collectors to unmask.” But the unmasking authority “resides with those who collected the information.”
Of course, the consumer doing the asking in this case was not just any government official. We’re talking about Susan Rice. This was Obama’s right hand doing the asking. If she made an unmasking “request,” do you suppose anyone at the FBI, CIA, or NSA was going to say no? That brings us to three interesting points.
The first involves political intrusion into law enforcement — something that the White House is supposed to avoid. (You may remember that Democrats ran Bush attorney general Alberto Gonzales out of town over suspicions about it.)
As I have noted repeatedly, in publishing the illegally leaked classified information about former national-security adviser Michael Flynn’s communications with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, the New York Times informs us that “Obama advisers” and “Obama officials” were up to their eyeballs in the investigation: Obama advisers heard separately from the F.B.I. about Mr. Flynn’s conversation with Mr. Kislyak, whose calls were routinely monitored by American intelligence agencies that track Russian diplomats.
The Obama advisers grew suspicious that perhaps there had been a secret deal between the incoming team and Moscow, which could violate the rarely enforced, two-century-old Logan Act barring private citizens from negotiating with foreign powers in disputes with the United States. The Obama officials asked the F.B.I. if a quid pro quo had been discussed on the call, and the answer came back no, according to one of the officials, who like others asked not to be named discussing delicate communications. [Translation: “asked not to be named committing felony unauthorized disclosure of classified information.”] The topic of sanctions came up, they were told, but there was no deal. [Emphasis added.]
It appears very likely that Susan Rice was involved in the unmasking of Michael Flynn. Was she also monitoring the FBI’s investigation? Was she involved in the administration’s consideration of (bogus) criminal charges against Flynn? With the subsequent decision to have the FBI interrogate Flynn (or “grill” him, as the Times put it)?
The second point is that, while not a pillar of rectitude, Ms. Rice is not an idiot. Besides being shrewd, she was a highly involved, highly informed consumer of intelligence, and a key Obama political collaborator. Unlike the casual reader, she would have known who the Trump-team players were without needing to have their identities unmasked.
Do you really think her purpose in demanding that names be revealed was to enhance her understanding of intelligence about the activities and intentions of foreign targets? Seriously? I’m betting it was so that others down the dissemination chain could see the names of Trump associates — names the investigating agencies that originally collected the information had determined not to unmask.
Third, and finally, let’s consider the dissemination chain Rice had in mind. The most telling remark that former Obama deputy defense secretary Evelyn Farkas made in her now-infamous MSNBC interview was the throw-away line at the end: “That’s why you have all the leaking.” Put this in context: Farkas had left the Obama administration in 2015, subsequently joining the presidential campaign of, yes, Hillary Clinton — Trump’s opponent. She told MSNBC that she had been encouraging her former Obama-administration colleagues and members of Congress to seek “as much information as you can” from the intelligence community. “That’s why you have the leaking.”
To summarize: At a high level, officials like Susan Rice had names unmasked that would not ordinarily be unmasked. That information was then being pushed widely throughout the intelligence community in unmasked form . . . particularly after Obama, toward the end of his presidency, suddenly — and seemingly apropos of nothing — changed the rules so that all of the intelligence agencies (not just the collecting agencies) could have access to raw intelligence information.
As we know, the community of intelligence agencies leaks like a sieve, and the more access there is to juicy information, the more leaks there are. Meanwhile, former Obama officials and Clinton-campaign advisers, like Farkas, were pushing to get the information transferred from the intelligence community to members of Congress, geometrically increasing the likelihood of intelligence leaks.
By the way, have you noticed that there have been lots of intelligence leaks in the press? There’s an old saying in the criminal law: The best evidence of a conspiracy is success. The criminal law also has another good rule of thumb: Consciousness of guilt is best proved by false exculpatory statements.
That’s a genre in which Susan Rice has rich experience. Two weeks ago, she was asked in an interview about allegations by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R., Calif.) that the Obama administration had unmasked Trump-team members. “I know nothing about this,” Rice replied. “I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that count today.” Well, at least she didn’t blame it on a video.
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...aign-members-obama-administration-fbi-cia-nsa
Susan Rice
Last edited:
The left is ultimately pissed because proving Trump was wiretapped by those desperate for Russian collusion proves there was none. (Steyn)
Steyn: Media Annoyed Someone Has Outfaked Their Fake News - Fox Nation
Steyn: Media Annoyed Someone Has Outfaked Their Fake News - Fox Nation
funny that
[youtube]Xiv1Wzwz2iI[/youtube]
BREAKING: SMOKING GUN JUST FOUND IN OBAMA WIRETAPPING CASE! SUSAN RICE IS SCREWED!
[youtube]WB-96il-tb8[/youtube]
IT’S HAPPENING! IF RAND PAUL IS RIGHT, THEN OBAMA AND SUSAN RICE WILL BE BEHIND BARS!
Podesta took money to get sanctions lifted for Russia...
[youtube]6PT96362B5Y[/youtube]
Ron Paul on the fallout from the Susan Rice controversy
RICE -"AFTER THE PRESIDENT REQUESTED..."
[youtube]v7WmsWiporg[/youtube]
Obama Surveillance Of Trump Much WORSE Than Expected With Susan Rice!!
democrat suppoters starting violence with chicago police to blame Trump
brassile leaked questions to Hillary
wasserman shultz fixed entire primary for Hillary
spying on innocent Americans without a warrant for political reasons
....and they still couldn't win the selection!!!
bigger then watergate
do not pass go
do not collect 200 dollars
[youtube]Xiv1Wzwz2iI[/youtube]
BREAKING: SMOKING GUN JUST FOUND IN OBAMA WIRETAPPING CASE! SUSAN RICE IS SCREWED!
[youtube]WB-96il-tb8[/youtube]
IT’S HAPPENING! IF RAND PAUL IS RIGHT, THEN OBAMA AND SUSAN RICE WILL BE BEHIND BARS!
Podesta took money to get sanctions lifted for Russia...
[youtube]6PT96362B5Y[/youtube]
Ron Paul on the fallout from the Susan Rice controversy
RICE -"AFTER THE PRESIDENT REQUESTED..."
[youtube]v7WmsWiporg[/youtube]
Obama Surveillance Of Trump Much WORSE Than Expected With Susan Rice!!
democrat suppoters starting violence with chicago police to blame Trump
brassile leaked questions to Hillary
wasserman shultz fixed entire primary for Hillary
spying on innocent Americans without a warrant for political reasons
....and they still couldn't win the selection!!!
bigger then watergate
do not pass go
do not collect 200 dollars
Last edited:
[youtube]-UqqEaFUopA[/youtube]
Michelle Backmann says this is a thousand times worse then watergate, and may well cause jail time to those involved.
It's the only thing journalists should be talking about for the next month she said.
and now we have Syria for the third time - recycled propaganda
pffft!
Michelle Backmann says this is a thousand times worse then watergate, and may well cause jail time to those involved.
It's the only thing journalists should be talking about for the next month she said.
and now we have Syria for the third time - recycled propaganda
pffft!
SUSAN RICE IS FINISHED! NEW COMPUTER LOGS REVEAL SHOCKING DATA THAT PROVES SHE IS GUILTY!
Published on Apr 5, 2017
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Cristina Laila for the Gateway Pundit reports, White House logs left behind by the Obama administration show that Susan Rice’s interest in gathering NSA docs on Trump and his associates accelerated after Trump won the election in November and continued through January.
[youtube]wkfvLX807gU[/youtube]
oooopsi
Published on Apr 5, 2017
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Cristina Laila for the Gateway Pundit reports, White House logs left behind by the Obama administration show that Susan Rice’s interest in gathering NSA docs on Trump and his associates accelerated after Trump won the election in November and continued through January.
[youtube]wkfvLX807gU[/youtube]
oooopsi
if not fake news...no news it seems
then there is audience participation:
Bill oH Realy's ratings have gone up since his sex scandals have been made public once again...
(unless some of his viewers are Chinese bots)
TV Ratings: Bill O'Reilly Audience Grows Amid Scandal
TV Ratings: Bill O'Reilly Audience Grows Amid Scandal | Hollywood Reporter
then there is audience participation:
Bill oH Realy's ratings have gone up since his sex scandals have been made public once again...
(unless some of his viewers are Chinese bots)
TV Ratings: Bill O'Reilly Audience Grows Amid Scandal
TV Ratings: Bill O'Reilly Audience Grows Amid Scandal | Hollywood Reporter
[youtube]MRAJxZNFL8A[/youtube]
NOW IT MAKES SENSE! LOOK WHO SUSAN RICE’S HUSBAND WORKS FOR!!!! NO WONDER THEY’RE KEEPING QUIET!!!
an executive from ABC
your LYING HORSE HOCKEY PRESS
yeah
sure does
but they say marriage sure cuts down on that kinda fun
[youtube]LgXASvZM6RI[/youtube]
DAMAGE CONTROL!! THIS OBAMA INSIDER JUST DOUBLED DOWN FOR SUSAN RICE ON CNN - THEY’RE FALLING APART!
lil more horse hockey
Syrialiously, I wonder if anything they say is true
NOW IT MAKES SENSE! LOOK WHO SUSAN RICE’S HUSBAND WORKS FOR!!!! NO WONDER THEY’RE KEEPING QUIET!!!
an executive from ABC
your LYING HORSE HOCKEY PRESS
yeah
sure does
but they say marriage sure cuts down on that kinda fun
[youtube]LgXASvZM6RI[/youtube]
DAMAGE CONTROL!! THIS OBAMA INSIDER JUST DOUBLED DOWN FOR SUSAN RICE ON CNN - THEY’RE FALLING APART!
lil more horse hockey
Syrialiously, I wonder if anything they say is true
Last edited:
[youtube]4QYEQJ0g2fc[/youtube]
BREAKING!!! SUSAN RICE JUST CHANGED HER STORY
Published on Apr 6, 2017
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Jack Davis for western journalism reports, Former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, who initially denounced the “false statements” issued by President Donald Trump when he claimed President Barack Obama “wiretapped” him last year, has offered differing versions of what she knew about surveillance activities in which the identities of Trump associates were unmasked.
lol
liar
[youtube]WRjRvIxFpvM[/youtube]
JUDGE NAP JUST DESTROYED SUSAN RICE AND OBAMA FOR THEIR CRIMES ON LIVE TV THIS IS HUGE!!!!
Published on Apr 6, 2017
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Cristina Laila for the Gateway Pundit reports, Judge Napolitano weighed in on Rice-gate, giving us his expert opinion on the subject of unmasking private citizens for reasons other than national security, “That’s called espionage”.
" she only has one boss and that's obama "
BREAKING!!! SUSAN RICE JUST CHANGED HER STORY
Published on Apr 6, 2017
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Jack Davis for western journalism reports, Former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, who initially denounced the “false statements” issued by President Donald Trump when he claimed President Barack Obama “wiretapped” him last year, has offered differing versions of what she knew about surveillance activities in which the identities of Trump associates were unmasked.
lol
liar
[youtube]WRjRvIxFpvM[/youtube]
JUDGE NAP JUST DESTROYED SUSAN RICE AND OBAMA FOR THEIR CRIMES ON LIVE TV THIS IS HUGE!!!!
Published on Apr 6, 2017
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Cristina Laila for the Gateway Pundit reports, Judge Napolitano weighed in on Rice-gate, giving us his expert opinion on the subject of unmasking private citizens for reasons other than national security, “That’s called espionage”.
" she only has one boss and that's obama "
Really, between not seemly capable of understanding what is actually being said on those broadcasts you post and the junk papers that gain their membership from those who just love junk sensationalism, you must have a very. very dull life!!.
At least the Midnight or National Inquirer never expected readers to take them seriously. I am quite ashamed to see how the Canadian educational system failed when coming upon what some people embrace as truth. Oh well, I must assume this sort of publishing is making the day for some.
By the way are you interested in buying the Montreal's Mercier or Victoria Bridges.....I might be able to get a good price for you.
At least the Midnight or National Inquirer never expected readers to take them seriously. I am quite ashamed to see how the Canadian educational system failed when coming upon what some people embrace as truth. Oh well, I must assume this sort of publishing is making the day for some.
By the way are you interested in buying the Montreal's Mercier or Victoria Bridges.....I might be able to get a good price for you.
[youtube]2jJ5Zxltf-8[/youtube]
HOLY CRAP! THE LIBERAL MEDIA JUST TURNED ON SUSAN RICE! THEY HAVE FINALLY ADMITTED THE TRUTH!
Published on Apr 12, 2017
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | TruthFeed News reports, Everyone knows Susan Rice is a LIAR. SHE knows it Conservatives know it. And, yes – EVEN Democrats know it. From FoxNews Susan Rice is a liar and that’s the truth.
The WAPO even has given her 4 pinocchios
EVEN THE LIBERAL MEDIA is admitting Susan Rice is a LIAR
http://truthfeed.com/even-the-liberal-media-is-admitting-susan-rice-is-a-liar/64128/
Oh gawd, lol, read the article!
So Obomba is throwing her under the bus and as it applies to this thread, you now know what kind of low life she actually is, and what her word is really worth.
[youtube]S8ohYa08o0E[/youtube]
Dakota Meyer: Susan Rice Was Obama Admin's 'Liar In Chief'
Published on Apr 9, 2017
Medal of Honor recipient Dakota Meyer said former National Security Adviser Susan Rice was effectively the Obama White House's "liar-in-chief."
Meyer said on "Fox & Friends Weekend" that Rice's claim that the Obama administration had successfully removed chemical weapons from Syria was debunked after last week's gas attack.
Meyer invited Rice to tell the Syrians affected by the attack that she was effective at removing those same weapons from the country.
...of course we know the Turks brought the stuff from benghazi in for ISUS this time
and so that is why the LEFT is selling her out now
jeez, what a bunch of VIPERS of spin in washingmachington
from the comments
"Susan rice might be fibber, but the chemicals that got exposed the other day didn't come from the Syrian government they came from a storehouse that got hit by a Syrian Jet. Those chemicals were in the hands of ISIS meant for Syrian civilians. So Gary why don't you report the truth? Assad doesn't even allow GMA food for his population. You are a Rothschild puppet!"
HOLY CRAP! THE LIBERAL MEDIA JUST TURNED ON SUSAN RICE! THEY HAVE FINALLY ADMITTED THE TRUTH!
Published on Apr 12, 2017
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | TruthFeed News reports, Everyone knows Susan Rice is a LIAR. SHE knows it Conservatives know it. And, yes – EVEN Democrats know it. From FoxNews Susan Rice is a liar and that’s the truth.
The WAPO even has given her 4 pinocchios
EVEN THE LIBERAL MEDIA is admitting Susan Rice is a LIAR
http://truthfeed.com/even-the-liberal-media-is-admitting-susan-rice-is-a-liar/64128/
Oh gawd, lol, read the article!
So Obomba is throwing her under the bus and as it applies to this thread, you now know what kind of low life she actually is, and what her word is really worth.
[youtube]S8ohYa08o0E[/youtube]
Dakota Meyer: Susan Rice Was Obama Admin's 'Liar In Chief'
Published on Apr 9, 2017
Medal of Honor recipient Dakota Meyer said former National Security Adviser Susan Rice was effectively the Obama White House's "liar-in-chief."
Meyer said on "Fox & Friends Weekend" that Rice's claim that the Obama administration had successfully removed chemical weapons from Syria was debunked after last week's gas attack.
Meyer invited Rice to tell the Syrians affected by the attack that she was effective at removing those same weapons from the country.
...of course we know the Turks brought the stuff from benghazi in for ISUS this time
and so that is why the LEFT is selling her out now
jeez, what a bunch of VIPERS of spin in washingmachington
from the comments
"Susan rice might be fibber, but the chemicals that got exposed the other day didn't come from the Syrian government they came from a storehouse that got hit by a Syrian Jet. Those chemicals were in the hands of ISIS meant for Syrian civilians. So Gary why don't you report the truth? Assad doesn't even allow GMA food for his population. You are a Rothschild puppet!"
Last edited:
CNN Confirms Fox's Napolitano - British Intelligence Passed On Trump Surveillance To US Spy Agency
CNN Confirms Fox's Napolitano - British Intelligence Passed On Trump Surveillance To US Spy Agency | Zero Hedge
THERE YOU HAVE IT!!!!
remember when the mainstream press trashed this idea as a "conspiracy theory" ?
lol
F-TARDS
CNN Confirms Fox's Napolitano - British Intelligence Passed On Trump Surveillance To US Spy Agency | Zero Hedge
THERE YOU HAVE IT!!!!
remember when the mainstream press trashed this idea as a "conspiracy theory" ?
lol
F-TARDS
Key lawmakers say they have no evidence for Trump's wiretap claim - Chicago Tribune
Even Trump's own party says there is no truth in those Allegations.!! You do realize that not one shred of proof or names of those offering the information to Fox's "Judge" is offered!!
Even Trump's own party says there is no truth in those Allegations.!! You do realize that not one shred of proof or names of those offering the information to Fox's "Judge" is offered!!
Here you go BlueByrd...ENJOY
(Oh loook: the NEW YORK POST
"Turns out Obama was the real Russian stooge
The circumstantial evidence is mounting that the Kremlin succeeded in infiltrating the US government at the highest levels.
How else to explain a newly elected president looking the other way after an act of Russian aggression? Agreeing to a farcically one-sided nuclear deal? Mercilessly mocking the idea that Russia represents our foremost geo-political foe?
Accommodating the illicit nuclear ambitions of a Russian ally? Welcoming a Russian foothold in the Middle East? Refusing to provide arms to a sovereign country invaded by Russia? Diminishing our defenses and pursuing a Moscow-friendly policy of hostility to fossil fuels?
All of these items, of course, refer to things said or done by President Barack Obama.
To take them in order: He re-set with Russia shortly after its clash with Georgia in 2008. He concluded the New START agreement with Moscow that reduced our nuclear forces but not theirs. When candidate Mitt Romney warned about Russia in the 2012 campaign, Obama rejected him as a Cold War relic.
The president then went on to forge an agreement with Russia’s ally Iran to allow it to preserve its nuclear program. During the red-line fiasco, he eagerly grasped a lifeline from Russia at the price of accepting its intervention in Syria. He never budged on giving Ukraine “lethal” weapons to defend itself from Russian attack.
Finally, Obama cut US defense spending and cracked down on fossil fuels — a policy that Russia welcomes, since its economy is dependent on high oil prices.
Put all of this together, and it’s impossible to conclude anything other than that Obama was a Russian stooge — and not out of any nefarious dealings, but out of his own naïveté and weakness.
Turns out Obama was the real Russian stooge | New York Post
....and the Clintons being the ones that armed Kim Jong EEl with the nukes....and her urainium deal with russia...then you have the leaked audio just before the next to last election with Medeyev...and even before the first election of obamba, the russians claimed obama the communitarian as their man...
What a bunch of freaks
BTW you can bet fox checked out the facts when they decided to rehire the judge
maybe they just didn't tell you yet
"“I think a lot more is going to come,” Napolitano responded.."
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...turns-fox-news-stands-claim-brits-spied-trump
see the above thread
(Oh loook: the NEW YORK POST
"Turns out Obama was the real Russian stooge
The circumstantial evidence is mounting that the Kremlin succeeded in infiltrating the US government at the highest levels.
How else to explain a newly elected president looking the other way after an act of Russian aggression? Agreeing to a farcically one-sided nuclear deal? Mercilessly mocking the idea that Russia represents our foremost geo-political foe?
Accommodating the illicit nuclear ambitions of a Russian ally? Welcoming a Russian foothold in the Middle East? Refusing to provide arms to a sovereign country invaded by Russia? Diminishing our defenses and pursuing a Moscow-friendly policy of hostility to fossil fuels?
All of these items, of course, refer to things said or done by President Barack Obama.
To take them in order: He re-set with Russia shortly after its clash with Georgia in 2008. He concluded the New START agreement with Moscow that reduced our nuclear forces but not theirs. When candidate Mitt Romney warned about Russia in the 2012 campaign, Obama rejected him as a Cold War relic.
The president then went on to forge an agreement with Russia’s ally Iran to allow it to preserve its nuclear program. During the red-line fiasco, he eagerly grasped a lifeline from Russia at the price of accepting its intervention in Syria. He never budged on giving Ukraine “lethal” weapons to defend itself from Russian attack.
Finally, Obama cut US defense spending and cracked down on fossil fuels — a policy that Russia welcomes, since its economy is dependent on high oil prices.
Put all of this together, and it’s impossible to conclude anything other than that Obama was a Russian stooge — and not out of any nefarious dealings, but out of his own naïveté and weakness.
Turns out Obama was the real Russian stooge | New York Post
....and the Clintons being the ones that armed Kim Jong EEl with the nukes....and her urainium deal with russia...then you have the leaked audio just before the next to last election with Medeyev...and even before the first election of obamba, the russians claimed obama the communitarian as their man...
What a bunch of freaks
BTW you can bet fox checked out the facts when they decided to rehire the judge
maybe they just didn't tell you yet
"“I think a lot more is going to come,” Napolitano responded.."
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...turns-fox-news-stands-claim-brits-spied-trump
see the above thread
Last edited:
Yeah. Right. Obama's investment billons came from Russian Oligarchs who still hold the mortgage on him.
Got any proof of what ever you say?
You never have proof of anything you say normally
Mainly because it never seems to be true-just a BS comment to make real discussion difficult if not impossible.
One thing about Napolitano is, he has credentials and a history of being correct
What have you got? nothing but the WAPO and CNN...and a history of being wrong:
The spell nazi who make spelling mistakes
[youtube]XsFR8DbSRQE[/youtube]
Obama open mic slip: 'After my election I have more flexibility'
We know what flexibility means in your world.
Emails show Clinton ties to Russian oligarch under investigation
New emails show Clinton Foundation staff pushed Hillary Clinton's State Department to approve a meeting between Bill Clinton and a powerful Russian oligarch as her agency lined up investors for a project under his purview.
The Clintons' relationship with Viktor Vekselberg, the billionaire whose name appears in the documents, has taken on new significance amid an expanding criminal investigation into his company. Last week, authorities raided the offices of Vekselberg's firm, Renova Group, following allegations of bribery from several of Renova's subsidiaries.
Emails show Clinton ties to Russian oligarch under investigation | Washington Examiner
Bidness as usual
"30 days after Judge Napolitano broke that story it turns out that he was right.
According to CNN via Zero Hedge: “British and other European intelligence agencies intercepted communications between associates of Donald Trump and Russian officials and other Russian individuals during the campaign and passed on those communications to their US counterparts, US congressional and law enforcement and US and European intelligence sources tell CNN.”
European intelligence agencies detected conversations between Trump associates and Russians and then passed that intelligence to the U.S. and Britain as part o the “Five Eyes” program." (h/t The Gateway Pundit)http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/judge-napolitano-right-obama-went-british-intel-spy-trump/
*** SHARE this everywhere, patriots! This needs to get out now. Trump was spied on and we have the proof of how they did it now.
https://libertywriters.com/2017/04/...risked-everything-say-1-thing-fox-news-today/
CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/13/politics/trump-russia-british-intelligence/index.html
yeah, there you go
You never have proof of anything you say normally
Mainly because it never seems to be true-just a BS comment to make real discussion difficult if not impossible.
One thing about Napolitano is, he has credentials and a history of being correct
What have you got? nothing but the WAPO and CNN...and a history of being wrong:
The spell nazi who make spelling mistakes
[youtube]XsFR8DbSRQE[/youtube]
Obama open mic slip: 'After my election I have more flexibility'
We know what flexibility means in your world.
Emails show Clinton ties to Russian oligarch under investigation
New emails show Clinton Foundation staff pushed Hillary Clinton's State Department to approve a meeting between Bill Clinton and a powerful Russian oligarch as her agency lined up investors for a project under his purview.
The Clintons' relationship with Viktor Vekselberg, the billionaire whose name appears in the documents, has taken on new significance amid an expanding criminal investigation into his company. Last week, authorities raided the offices of Vekselberg's firm, Renova Group, following allegations of bribery from several of Renova's subsidiaries.
Emails show Clinton ties to Russian oligarch under investigation | Washington Examiner
Bidness as usual
"30 days after Judge Napolitano broke that story it turns out that he was right.
According to CNN via Zero Hedge: “British and other European intelligence agencies intercepted communications between associates of Donald Trump and Russian officials and other Russian individuals during the campaign and passed on those communications to their US counterparts, US congressional and law enforcement and US and European intelligence sources tell CNN.”
European intelligence agencies detected conversations between Trump associates and Russians and then passed that intelligence to the U.S. and Britain as part o the “Five Eyes” program." (h/t The Gateway Pundit)http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/judge-napolitano-right-obama-went-british-intel-spy-trump/
*** SHARE this everywhere, patriots! This needs to get out now. Trump was spied on and we have the proof of how they did it now.
https://libertywriters.com/2017/04/...risked-everything-say-1-thing-fox-news-today/
CNN
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/13/politics/trump-russia-british-intelligence/index.html
yeah, there you go
Last edited: