BREAKING: We Just Discovered Who Issued The Warrant To Investigate Trump

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
and it's not going the way he hoped it would. In his world, he thought he A class. He's learning real quick that he's truly just white trash with too much money and not enough brains.

He's always been THE boss. I don't think that it ever occurred to him that a President is answerable to anyone.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Former Obama DoD Deputy Evelyn Farkas Slips Up - Reveals Spying And Leaking Trump Intel

[youtube]DdTGnpHR_sk[/youtube]

If Evelyn Farkas Resigned in 2015, How Did She Have Access to Trump-Russian Intelligence?

This was making waves yesterday, after Evelyn Farkas admitted to Mika from The Morning Joe show that she strongly advised people 'on the hill' and in our intelligence agencies to tuck away intelligence regarding Russo-Trump ties for the sake of preservation, in an effort to protect it from the onerous bureaucracy she obviously finds to be deplorable.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...id-she-have-access-trump-russian-intelligence
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
It isn't about Trump Twila, I don't think:
It's about the dark government that's been running the show since 1913, and who killed JFK, and who also did 911...
...and who want to take the whole world down.

Who Is Evelyn Farkas? - Worked In Obama Admin; Was Advisor To Hillary R. Clinton - Fox & Friends
[youtube]YsZSNcogDVo[/youtube]

BOOM! OBAMA AND HILLARY JUST OUTED BY LT. GENERAL FOR MAJOR CRIMES! THEY COULD BOTH ROT IN JAIL NOW!
[youtube]mYmQ6aQRkiI[/youtube]

Published on Mar 30, 2017
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Cristina Laila for the Gateway Pundit reports, Lt. General Thomas McInerney appeared on Fox News to discuss Obamagate and the attacks on Devin Nunes who recently came out confirming that Trump was surveilled between Election Day and Inauguration Day.
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
It isn't about Drumpf Twila, I don't think:
It's about the dark government that's been running the show since 1913, and who killed JFK, and who also did 911...
...and who want to take the whole world down.

Maybe be not. Non of us can every really know for sure how many of whom is in control of everything or anything. I don't think you or I will ever truly know the facts. Maybe in my daughters life time, things might be outed.

But trump is hilarious. The whole trump, hilary, thing... amazeballs that the whole thing happened, is happening and that's its all falling around the way it is, in the way it is.

and there have been and will be some outrageous things said and done.

Life is interesting fo sho.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Yeah, kinda like the last hours of a piece of steak just sitting on a table out in the front yard in the weather for a few days.
;)
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,247
14,259
113
Low Earth Orbit
It isn't about Trump Twila, I don't think:
It's about the dark government that's been running the show since 1913, and who killed JFK, and who also did 911...
...and who want to take the whole world down.

Who Is Evelyn Farkas? - Worked In Obama Admin; Was Advisor To Hillary R. Clinton - Fox & Friends
[youtube]YsZSNcogDVo[/youtube]

BOOM! OBAMA AND HILLARY JUST OUTED BY LT. GENERAL FOR MAJOR CRIMES! THEY COULD BOTH ROT IN JAIL NOW!
[youtube]mYmQ6aQRkiI[/youtube]

Published on Mar 30, 2017
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Cristina Laila for the Gateway Pundit reports, Lt. General Thomas McInerney appeared on Fox News to discuss Obamagate and the attacks on Devin Nunes who recently came out confirming that Trump was surveilled between Election Day and Inauguration Day.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. The Illuminaughty lost the election and they are pissed.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Yeah that's true..
and they are also getting exposed
;)
vampires do not like the light
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,247
14,259
113
Low Earth Orbit


Breaking: Bevis and Butthead are real.


No sh-t Sherlock. Beavis is Premier of Ontario.




huh huh huh yeah huh huh Premier
 

bluebyrd35

Council Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,373
0
36
Ormstown.Chat.Valley
Former Obama DoD Deputy Evelyn Farkas Slips Up - Reveals Spying And Leaking Trump Intel

[youtube]DdTGnpHR_sk[/youtube]

If Evelyn Farkas Resigned in 2015, How Did She Have Access to Trump-Russian Intelligence?

This was making waves yesterday, after Evelyn Farkas admitted to Mika from The Morning Joe show that she strongly advised people 'on the hill' and in our intelligence agencies to tuck away intelligence regarding Russo-Trump ties for the sake of preservation, in an effort to protect it from the onerous bureaucracy she obviously finds to be deplorable.

If Evelyn Farkas Resigned in 2015, How Did She Have Access to Trump-Russian Intelligence? | Zero Hedge

..............................................................
Your assumptions as usual are skewed.

Did Evelyn Farkas Just Leak Information Confirming President Obama Spied on President Trump?

For goodness sake ,,,,,start with the when, why, where of a story and try choosing a reliable source.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Latest WikiLeaks release shows how the CIA uses computer code to hide the origins of its hacking attacks and 'disguise them as Russian or Chinese activity'
WikiLeaks published 676 source code files today which it claimed are from CIA
It says the CIA disguised its own hacking attacks to make it appear those responsible were Russian, Chinese, Iranian or North Korean
WikiLeaks says CIA disguised hacking as Russian activity* | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

..............................................................
Your assumptions as usual are skewed.

Did Evelyn Farkas Just Leak Information Confirming President Obama Spied on President Trump?

For goodness sake ,,,,,start with the when, why, where of a story and try choosing a reliable source.

Well how about YOU DO THAT YOURSELF!!!!

RIGHT FROM THE HORSES MOUTH YOU NUT!!!!

This lady is still justifying the spying by using the Russia link, but with Crowdstrike, the sole "evidence" for such a link now discredited, it is clear the spying was political, and probably happened all last year. It is worse than Watergate!
[youtube]24y32xPH8I8[/youtube]

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED | The History The US Government HOPES You Never Learn!
 
Last edited:

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
White House Invites Lawmakers to View Surveillance Documents

The Trump administration invited leaders of congressional intelligence panels to review documents it said raise questions about whether government spy agencies improperly identified President Donald Trump’s campaign officials and associates in the course of routine foreign surveillance.

In a letter signed by White House Counsel Donald McGahn, the administration said Thursday it was responding to a March 15 request from intelligence committees for “documents necessary to determine whether information collected on U.S. persons was mishandled and leaked.” It asks the committees to probe whether the intelligence was properly gathered, whether names were improperly revealed and “to the extent that U.S. citizens were subject to such surveillance, were civil liberties violated?”

White House press secretary Sean Spicer announced the invitation during a briefing with reporters in Washington Thursday, shortly after the New York Times reported that two White House officials had provided House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes with reports showing that Trump and his associates were named incidentally by U.S. spy agencies monitoring foreign officials.


Schiff during a news conference on Capitol Hill, on March 30.Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg
The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam Schiff, said he’s willing to review the material but questioned the administration’s motives, saying officials may be trying to disseminate information that helps Trump’s case. “I hope they’ll have some kind of explanation for why they chose this path,” Schiff told reporters at the Capitol.

Deflecting Questions

The administration has been deflecting questions about Russian meddling in the presidential election by focusing on leaks of classified materials and, more recently, Trump’s allegations that his predecessor may have spied on him and his aides before and after the election. The spying claims and the leaks have become prominent sidelights to a broader investigation by the FBI and congressional intelligence committees into Russia’s campaign to disrupt U.S. politics and whether anyone close to Trump colluded with Russia.

At a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing Thursday, several experts testified that Russia’s efforts began as early as 2008 and peaked during last year’s election. The moves included propagation of false news stories and the hacking of Democratic Party computer systems followed by the release of emails. Clint Watts, former FBI agent who is now a national security expert at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, said other targets were prominent Republicans, including House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senator Marco Rubio, a member of the intelligence panel.

Rubio of Florida said Thursday that staff members on his presidential campaign were unsuccessfully targeted in July 2016 by hackers using an address in Russia and that former campaign aides were again targeted on Wednesday.

Inquiry in Turmoil

The House Intelligence Committee’s inquiry was thrown into turmoil when Nunes, a California Republican, last week held a news conference to outline material he said suggested some names of Trump associates were incidentally revealed during legal surveillance of foreign sources. He then went to the White House to brief Trump while refusing to share the information with other members of the committee. After repeated questions about how he got the material, Nunes said on March 27 that he met a source on the White House grounds.

Democrat Schiff, also of California, has called for Nunes to step aside from the investigation and accused him of doing the president’s bidding. Schiff said Thursday he is “more than willing” to go to the White House to review the material being offered but that the committee’s broader investigation must continue.

“This is not going to distract us from doing our Russia investigation,” Schiff said, adding that the White House action “raises profound questions.”

He said he didn’t know whether the material being offered is the same as the documents that were viewed by Nunes.

Keep up with the best of Bloomberg Politics.
Get our newsletter daily.

Enter your email
Sign Up
Nunes has refused to say who showed him the material, and Spicer has said he didn’t know the identity of Nunes’ source. The New York Times, citing unnamed U.S. officials, reported Thursday that Nunes was shown the material by Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the senior director for intelligence at the National Security Council, and Michael Ellis, who works at the White House Counsel’s Office and previously worked on the House Intelligence Committee staff.

Cohen-Watnick was an aide brought into the White House by Michael Flynn, who was fired as national security adviser in February after Trump concluded Flynn had given misleading information about contacts with Russian officials.

‘Smart Move’

“Our view was that the smart move was to make all the materials available to the chairman and the ranking member of the relevant committees,” Spicer said Thursday. “We want them to look into this, as we have maintained all along -- that I think there’s a belief that the president has maintained -- that there was surveillance that occurred during the 2016 election that was improper.”

Nunes has said, and the Times said it confirmed, that the material isn’t related to the investigation into Russian attempts to influence the election, nor did it necessarily show any illegal surveillance of U.S. citizens.

While the House investigation has been stymied by the dispute over the material shown to Nunes, the Senate Intelligence Committee is proceeding with its own investigation. Panel Chairman Richard Burr, a North Carolina Republican, vowed that the probe won’t be politicized.

“The public deserves to hear the truth about possible Russian involvement in our elections,” Burr said.

Virginia Senator Mark Warner, the committee’s top Democrat, echoed that sentiment, but also expressed concern about what he called Trump’s “wild and uncorroborated accusations” that then-President Barack Obama ordered Trump Tower wiretapped and about Trumps intermittent attacks on intelligence agencies.
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/...intelligence-panels-can-see-surveillance-data
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
he has already been hung for not
;)

[youtube]nI4ADv5mC_s[/youtube]
here, if you really want a good summary of "worse then watergate"
if not... haha on you.

at least now we know why the intelligentCIA and the efFeBI are not catching terrorists
they are to busy snooping on the targets of terrorism
 
Last edited:

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
SHOCK: Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley Sends Second Letter To FBI Director Comey Asking Why FBI Was Involved With Paying Research Firm For Trump/Russia Dossier.

Wow, did I honestly just read this? Senator Charles Grassley has sent his second letter to FBI Director James Comey to inquire about how the FBI became involved in colluding with Christopher Steele, a former agent for the U.K.’s foreign intelligence service, MI6, concerning the lurid dossier on President Donald Trump and Russia.

I am sitting here reading this in disbelief, as this whole thing just keeps getting bigger and bigger like Director Comey’s nose. This is Senator Grassley’s second letter! Does Comey really believe he can hide behind closed doors at this point? Director Comey needs to wake up and confess his dirty deeds.

So now we discover the FBI was actually involved in that crazy dossier and the golden waters story! I still am not clear on where this actually originated. There was an actual rumor it originated on the Internet site 4chan as a prank. Remember that? But then it turned into the Christopher Steele spy story, and finally there was actually a man associated with Steele who was found deceased in his car.

Steele had been commissioned by an opposition research firm at the request of Republican opponents of Trump to dig into allegations that the Russian government had a substantial amount of compromising information on Trump during his effort to win the GOP presidential nomination. After Trump became the party nominee, a backer of Hillary Clinton continued to pay for the information. This is unbelievable!

In October just a few weeks before the election, the FBI agreed to fund Steele’s investigations even as it remained unsure about the legitimacy. No payments were ever exchanged, but the damage was done after the dossier became public knowledge. Who would ever imagine the FBI would be mixed up in such a thing?

“The idea that the FBI and associates of the Clinton campaign would pay Mr. Steele to investigate the Republican nominee for president in the run-up to the election raises further questions about the FBI’s independence from politics,” Grassley wrote in a March 6 letter to Comey. However, that letter went unanswered.

Here is a video about the matter:

How can FBI Director James Comey continue to disregard the law when he is the Director of what used to be the most respected agency not only in the United States but the world? What has he done to the FBI? It can never recover from this type of damage. While the FBI was created to uphold the law, it became involved with Hillary Clinton, and helped to destroy it…just as she does everything she touches, with the germs of dirty money.

In Grassley’s second letter dated March 28, he says, “The idea that the FBI and associates of the Clinton campaign would pay Mr. Steele to investigate the Republican nominee for president in the run-up to the election raises further questions about the FBI’s independence from politics, as well as the Obama Administration’s use of law enforcement and intelligence agencies for political ends.”

Why doesn’t someone just charge Clinton and Obama once and for all?

Further Grassley demands that “all FBI policies, procedures, and guidelines applicable when the FBI seeks to fund an investigator associated with a political opposition research firm connected to a political candidate, or with any outside entity.”

A very important aspect in Grassley’s communications to the FBI is his focus on Andrew McCabe. McCabe was a friend of Hillary’s. He is currently under investigation by the FBI’s Inspector General for playing a role in Clinton’s email investigation. Here we go again with Hillary Clinton’s poisonous touch.

McCabe’s wife accepted nearly $700,000 in political donations arranged by a close friend, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, for her run for state senator. Remember that? I do!

Grassley goes on to write: “While Mr McCabe recused himself from public corruption cases in Virginia…he failed to recuse himself from the Clinton email investigation, despite the appearance of a conflict created by his wife’s campaign accepting $700,000 from a close Clinton associate during the investigation.”

A key passage from Grassley’s letter is as follows:

Mr. McCabe’s appearance of a partisan conflict of interest relating to Clinton associates only magnifies the importance of those questions. That is particularly true if Mr. McCabe was involved in approving or establishing the FBI’s reported arrangement with Mr. Steele, or if Mr. McCabe vouched for or otherwise relied on the politically-funded dossier in the course of the investigation. Simply put, the American people should know if the FBI’s second-in-command relied on Democrat-funded opposition research to justify an investigation of the Republican presidential campaign.



The following questions are being asked by Grassley of the FBI:

Has McCabe been involved “in any capacity” in investigating alleged collusion between TrumpWorld and Russia?
Has McCabe been involved in surveillance or intercepts of any sort in the case?
Has McCabe “made any representations to prosecutors or judges” regarding the Steele dossier?
Has McCabe had any interactions with Steele himself?
Did McCabe brief anyone in the Obama administration on the Trump-Russia investigation?
Was McCabe ever authorized by the FBI to speak to the media about the case?
Did he ever do so without authorization?
Has anyone in the FBI raised questions about McCabe’s possible Clinton-Trump conflict of interest?
Has any complaint been filed about it?
Has anyone at the FBI recommended or requested that McCabe recuse himself from the Russia-Trump investigation?
I truly appreciate Senator Charles Grassley and his commitment to the inquiry into the FBI’s role in this whole horrid affair. America waits speechless and in shock for answers.

[youtube]nvVlS5zeK2k[/youtube]

SHOCK: Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley Sends Second Letter To FBI Director Comey Asking Why FBI Was Involved With Paying Research Firm For Trump/Russia Dossier. – InvestmentWatch


wow, that Commie eh?
Funny he even has supporters at this point (what does it matter haha). I wonder what they are thinking of the credibility if their man now?

...and then there is McCabe
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
BREAKING: Susan Rice Preparing To Take Fall For Illegal Obama Spy Program?
BREAKING: Susan Rice Preparing To Take Fall For Illegal Obama Spy Program? - DCWhispers.com


ain't that a lizard's butt

Another Democrat Rats On Obama: We’ve Been Spying On Trump Since 2015

Another top Democrat has joined a long list of Obama insiders who have outed their former boss for illegally spying on Donald Trump.

Mary Anna Marsh, principal of the Dewey Square Group, a Democrat PR firm, revealed to Fox News that the Obama administration had been snooping on Trump as early as the spring of 2015.
Another Democrat Rats On Obama: We've Been Spying On Trump Since 2015 - Your News Wire
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113


Fresh evidence the Russia ‘scandal’ is a Team Obama operation
Do you suspect that the noise over Trump campaign contacts with the Russians is just a political hit arranged by Obama insiders before they left? You got fresh evidence of that Monday, with news that then-national security adviser Susan Rice was behind the “unmasking” of Trumpites in transcripts of calls with Russian officials.

Again, nothing on the public record so far shows that anyone on Team Trump said anything improper on those calls.

It’s no surprise that US spooks intercept foreign officials’ calls. But intelligence community reports don’t disclose the names of US citizens on the other end. To get that info, a high official must (but rarely does) push to “unmask” the Americans’ names.

Bloomberg’s Eli Lake now reports that Rice started doing just that last year.

That was perfectly legal. But we also know that the Obama administration later changed the classification of the “unmasked” transcripts, and other similar material, in order to spread the information as widely as possible within the government.

The motive for that was (supposedly) to prevent Team Trump from burying it all once it took over. But the result was that it made it relatively safe for someone (or someones) to leak the info to the press.

Which made it likely somebody would leak. So Team Obama’s “spread the info” initiative certainly broke the spirit of the laws.

Those leaks have produced a nagging political sore for the new administration — leading to the ouster of national security adviser Michael Flynn, helping to drive down President Trump’s approval ratings and making it harder for him to push his program through.

Rice certainly wasn’t politically naive about the political uses of intelligence information. She was, after all, the Obama official who famously made the rounds spouting the false “Our intel says it was about the video” line on the Benghazi attack back during the 2012 campaign.

All of this puts the actions of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes in clearer perspective. After viewing the Rice requests at the White House, he disclosed that Trump officials had been caught up in incidental surveillance.

All of which is a reminder that two issues are in play here: Russian meddling in the election, about which the nation already knows plenty — and the Obama team’s efforts to sabotage Team Trump.
Fresh evidence the Russia ‘scandal’ is a Team Obama operation | New York Post
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
The Real Russiagate: Obama’s Stasi State

Michael Hudson and Paul Craig Roberts

Mike Whitney has written an excellent expose of the “Russiagate” cover story for Obama’s political use of national security to help his party oppose Republicans. The Russia Hacking Fiasco: No Evidence Required

Covert surveillance of politicians on Obama’s Nixon-like “Enemies List” has been going on for many years, but is only now being unmasked as a result of the failure of Obama’s cover story–“We weren’t spying on political opponents; only on Russians to protect America.”

The presstitute media has passed on the cover story authored by former Obama-administration officials led by CIA director John Brennan, FBI director James Comey, the DNC, and Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff. The loose ends in this cover-up have now been so widely exposed as hearsay and political that only 13% of Republicans believe the fact-free story – but 67% of Democrats cling to it.

Whitney reports that Comey began the investigation in July 2016. As of last Friday (March 31, 2017) not a scrap of evidence has turned up. This did not deter Comey from telling Congress that Putin “hated Secretary Clinton so much that the flip side of that coin was that he had a clear preference for the person running against the person he hated so much.” So the Russians allegedly “engaged in a multifaceted campaign to undermine our democracy.”

Comey based this conclusion on what has become a hilarious bit of gullibililty. The Russians, he said “were unusually loud in their intervention. It’s almost as if they didn’t care that we knew, that they wanted us to see what they were doing.”

Alternatively, someone wanted investigators to infer that the Russians were doing the hacking. As Wikeleaks Vault 7 releases prove, the CIA can hack computers and leave anyone else’s signature. Due to poor security, the CIA’s cybertechnology ended up in the Internet domain.

“They’ll be back. They’ll be back, in 2020. They may be back in 2018,” warned Mr. Comey. But who is the “they”? “They” seem to be “us,” or at least what numerous former national security officials have suggested: either the NSC, CIA or its “Five Eyes” partner, British MI6.

Wall Street Journal editorialist Kimberley A. Strassel poses the real question: Why hasn’t the Trump administration had the Secret Service to arrest Comey, Brennan, Schiff, the DNC and Hillary for trying to overthrow the President of the United States? “Mr. Nunes has said he has seen proof that the Obama White House surveilled the incoming administration—on subjects that had nothing to do with Russia—and that it further unmasked (identified by name) transition officials. This goes far beyond a mere scandal. It’s a potential crime.” https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-devin-nunes-knows-1490914396

The Real Russiagate: Obama