funny how many terrorists on your list were/ are government employees or government cia program grads like Kazynsky
Armed militia, Bundy brothers take over federal building in rural Oregon
- Thread starter Twila
- Start date
David Burge @iowahawkblog
I'm old enough to remember when the media told us taking over government buildings was a good thing #Wisconsin2011
Hey, I'm no fan of takeovers of govt buildings. But by 2011 media standards, this is a mostly peaceful protest by social justice activists.
patechinois @patechinois1
@iowahawkblog Eric Holder was part of armed takeover of ROTC building. He became U.S. AG. Must be okay.
These ones are armed(they claim) so that would make them Social Justice Warriors. Leftards for short.
I'm old enough to remember when the media told us taking over government buildings was a good thing #Wisconsin2011
Hey, I'm no fan of takeovers of govt buildings. But by 2011 media standards, this is a mostly peaceful protest by social justice activists.
@iowahawkblog Eric Holder was part of armed takeover of ROTC building. He became U.S. AG. Must be okay.
You may want to inform this David Burge that the Wisconsin protestors were not armed protesters.
As for the Corporate b** licker Holder, he was amongst hundreds taking part and there was no proof he had any weapons........
God told Ammon Bundy to fight back against the government.
One day before Bundy became the public face of a group of ranchers and militia members who seized a government building in Harney County, Oregon, he posted a video to YouTube The video explains why Bundy became involved in the Harney County protest, beginning with the time he felt an “overwhelming urge” to find out more about a pair of Oregon ranchers facing prison for burning land.
In response to his urge to learn more, Bundy studied through the night, then finally prayed about what to do. God answered.
“I began to understand how the Lord felt about Harney County and about this country, and I clearly understood that the Lord was not pleased with what was happening to the Hammonds,” Bundy says in the video, referring to the Oregon ranchers. “What was happening to them, if it was not corrected, would be a type and a shadow of what would happen to the rest of the people across this country.”
more......
http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimdalrympl...-history-if-yo?utm_term=.qbbWJk6GW#.kaA6o3vx6
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zl5rkosu2Ig
Terrorists would be killing innocents and lefties would have burned the place down already.
Ever noticed, when you're passed ... it's almost always on the left? Sorta explains your compulsive fear....
ETA: Poor Walter.... Logic so escapes him :lol:
ETA: Poor Walter.... Logic so escapes him :lol:
Last edited:
The Government can be patient for a bit but in the end these folks
Will face the law and the law is they are breaking it. They owe a
million bucks in taxes I understand. There is a laundry list of issues.
These simple folks are not simple they are likely in a criminal breech
of the law and will soon see how it ends up for them in jail where they
belong
Will face the law and the law is they are breaking it. They owe a
million bucks in taxes I understand. There is a laundry list of issues.
These simple folks are not simple they are likely in a criminal breech
of the law and will soon see how it ends up for them in jail where they
belong
They're taking advantage of a situation that they're neither wanted for or even asked to have an opinion about. The two men they are there to 'protest' for want nothing to do with the BundyFundies.
These idiots are more a laughing stock to a lot of people than anything else. But IMO it wouldn't surprise me to see it escalated by them yet they blame it on the Feds. Maybe the Feds have the right idea by taking their time and not really rushing to do anything. Give them their fifteen of fame and when it doesn't get them anything, the media and others will move on and no one will care anymore.
These idiots are more a laughing stock to a lot of people than anything else. But IMO it wouldn't surprise me to see it escalated by them yet they blame it on the Feds. Maybe the Feds have the right idea by taking their time and not really rushing to do anything. Give them their fifteen of fame and when it doesn't get them anything, the media and others will move on and no one will care anymore.
Perhaps having learned their lesson from the from their previous premature support of the Cliven agenda, Republican candidates for president who once jumped on the Bundy bandwagon are staying out of the Bundy boys' attempts to overthrow the federal government by seizing the visitors' center of a wildlife refuge in remote Oregon.
When the New York Times asked a few of deadbeat rancher Cliven Bundy's prominent supporters what they thought of his comments beginning "I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro" and concluding that maybe slavery was better for black people, Sen. Dean Heller's office responded by saying that Heller "completely disagrees with Mr. Bundy’s appalling and racist statements, and condemns them in the most strenuous way." By contrast, Sen. Rand Paul's office said Paul wasn't available for comment. That started the clock. How long would it take Rand Paul to condemn the idea that there's a serious discussion to be had about whether slavery or freedom is better?
Sen. Rand Paul jumped to Cliven Bundy's support early on, when the Nevada rancher, his sons, and a bunch of trigger-twitchy terrorists had a standoff over Bundy's refusal to pay the millions he owes to the federal government and all of us as taxpayers for grazing his cattle on public land. Back then, Paul claimed states rights. "There is a legitimate constitutional question here about whether the state should be in charge of endangered species or whether the federal government should be." He also personally met with Bundy and reportedly one of the sons, and they talked about states rights and "education policy." Sure. Why not. A few months later we saw Mr. Bundy telling the world the things he "know about the Negro," and Rand Paul slunk quietly away. Thus far he's mum on the Oregon situation.
Likewise, Sen. Ted Cruz has yet to weigh in. When Bundy's decades of being a scofflaw resulted in his cattle being seized, Cruz blamed it on President Obama. The stand-off was "the unfortunate and tragic culmination of the path that President Obama has set the federal government on." Cruz apparently has no opinion now on government overreach in Oregon. Nor does Donald Trump, Ben Carson, nor Mike Huckabee, all of whom had nice things to say in general about Mr. Bundy and "his spirit, his spunk," as Trump put it.
It's probably wise for these guys not to stick their necks out this time. After all, Dwight and Steven Hammond—the actual ranchers who the Bundy boys say they are there to avenge—can't put enough distance between themselves and the Bundy boys, having their lawyer tell anyone who will listen that "[n]either Ammon Bundy nor anyone within his group/organization speak for the Hammond Family."
When the New York Times asked a few of deadbeat rancher Cliven Bundy's prominent supporters what they thought of his comments beginning "I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro" and concluding that maybe slavery was better for black people, Sen. Dean Heller's office responded by saying that Heller "completely disagrees with Mr. Bundy’s appalling and racist statements, and condemns them in the most strenuous way." By contrast, Sen. Rand Paul's office said Paul wasn't available for comment. That started the clock. How long would it take Rand Paul to condemn the idea that there's a serious discussion to be had about whether slavery or freedom is better?
Sen. Rand Paul jumped to Cliven Bundy's support early on, when the Nevada rancher, his sons, and a bunch of trigger-twitchy terrorists had a standoff over Bundy's refusal to pay the millions he owes to the federal government and all of us as taxpayers for grazing his cattle on public land. Back then, Paul claimed states rights. "There is a legitimate constitutional question here about whether the state should be in charge of endangered species or whether the federal government should be." He also personally met with Bundy and reportedly one of the sons, and they talked about states rights and "education policy." Sure. Why not. A few months later we saw Mr. Bundy telling the world the things he "know
Likewise, Sen. Ted Cruz has yet to weigh in. When Bundy's decades of being a scofflaw resulted in his cattle being seized, Cruz blamed it on President Obama. The stand-off was "the unfortunate and tragic culmination of the path that President Obama has set the federal government on." Cruz apparently has no opinion now on government overreach in Oregon. Nor does Donald Trump, Ben Carson, nor Mike Huckabee, all of whom had nice things to say in general about Mr. Bundy and "his spirit, his spunk," as Trump put it.
It's probably wise for these guys not to stick their necks out this time. After all, Dwight and Steven Hammond—the actual ranchers who the Bundy boys say they are there to avenge—can't put enough distance between themselves and the Bundy boys, having their lawyer tell anyone who will listen that "[n]either Ammon Bundy nor anyone within his group/organization speak for the Hammond Family."
a handful of these Apaches will help the government end the standoff:
those who sided with the government in Ferguson and Baltimore should have no problem with that idea
those who sided with the government in Ferguson and Baltimore should have no problem with that idea
Funny they are red necks, hillbillies, stupid for protesting, but when they Occupy Wall Street and parks... Well you Libtards defend that, don't you.
2nd Amendment was to stop the tyranny of the Government, I think it's working well..
2nd Amendment was to stop the tyranny of the Government, I think it's working well..
lol
and when I said people in Ferguson and Baltimore should take up arms to protect themselves like the Black Panthers did some of you reichtards objected
double standards, much ??
