Oh stop it all of you.
None of you have ever been in the shoes of an RCMP, and you're not getting a grip on the concept of the idea that our great-grandparents had which was that in order to have a just government it must respond to the will of the people instead of having a will brainwashed by Harper and his puppet masters. In their day they called them snake-oil salesmen.
It's just a big f-cking giant red herring. It's a peanut in the size of the nation police budget. In fact, it's so peanut, a G8 photo-op could be paid for with it... too bad all you Canadians living here don't get to partake of the money your country is worth, eh?
The logical thing to do is fix it because it's damaged... obviously... it has all the fingerprints of a bill that was ordered to be written.
Of course, if you've been there, you will know there will be evil saying things like,"well, the existence of any sort of registry implys control against Lucifer", but here's all you f-cking Canadian brainiacs have not been doing in order to define the rules of a border of a nation... sovereign... do any of you f-ckholes have any idea how to use that when possessed of a border facing a thing guaranteeing the right o shoot anyone in their constitution?
Why does Steven Harper only target dumb people to vote for him?
Why does he not try to be a Leader instead of a Ruler?
What's his issue? What does he want? Does he think Elizabeth-II will suck his dick if he gets a majority?
In case you didn't know... there's a debate going on in the international community over whether he's been bought off, or is just trying to get revenge.
Leading us to the question of Iggy.
If Iggy was with it, this would be the time to use his minority to make the nation better like minorities were use to improve things in the '60's.
I do not want to state things inappropriately, but he sure the heck is acting like someone who's heart has been hammered down somehow.
First question: were you drunk or stoned when you wrote that?
You were certainly incoherent.
The bill is such garbage, it is NOT fixable.
You miss the point: the entire CONCEPT of a registration system is ridiculous, expensive, and unworkable.........and in the end tracks only those guns owned by the most peaceful segment of society.
The the Firearms Act is a blatant attempt to make the ownership of guns so onerous that it is simply not and option, it is an attack on a culture........an insult, that leaves the crack dealer down the street safer from search than a gun owner.....to say nothing of the fact the crack dealer retains his right to remain silent....unlike a gun owner. Literally, gun owners are treated worse than criminals.
The long gun registry is simply the most obvious target of a group that has been attacked and demonized unfairly, and so it draws the fire. But the entire Act needs to go, and be replaced with a reasonable, respectful, CONSTITUTIONAL piece of legislation.
Look up Dr. Gary Mauser, his research shows that the murder rate among firearms license holders is 30 to 50% LESS than in the general population.....that despite the fact they are overwhelmingly men, and heavily armed by defintion. Obviously, they are the ones we need to target...... (insert rolled eyes here!)
I am not particularly happy with Harper et al........but the lies, the misinformation, the undemocratic whipping, the absolute refusal to consider throwing shooters the small bone that was Hoeppner's bill...........will keep me in the Conservative Party, and will keep me sending them money.
Until they get a majority, and kill this monster once and for all.
Want Harper out?
Agree to kill the Firearms Act.........and a decent part of his hardcore support will disappear like smoke in the wind.
Good for you. But the gun registry is not an instant fixit program. It is long term and over time will eliminate more and more of the illegally owned firearms in Canada. You might actively resist the registry, but when you die will your heirs adopt that same position? Not everyone willingly flouts the law. BTW your position on the gun registry is exactly what the anti-gun types want to eliminate. Thanks for giving them more ammunition.
That is hilarious!
First of all, civil disobedience of an unconstitutional law is perfectly legitimate........
Secondly, you are talking about several million unregistered firearms, with a useful life of at least 100 years.....................I still hunt with a rapid fire repeating rifle that was built in 1920.........
The absolute top-of-the line combat pistols, the ones carried by elite anti-terror units in the FBI, are a design patented in 1905. (the Colt 1911 in .45 ACP)
Handguns have been registered and strictly controled since 1934........yet their use in crime is increasing........as is the number of them on the street.
Simply put, a law that disrespects the people does not enhance a peaceful society, nor does it encourage compliance to the law of the land....indeed, it inspires disrespect of the law and enhances a willingness of good people to live outside the law.
That is a disaster.