Like I said,they jump from one conspiracy to a new one,like clockwork,now their at the Bin Laden cycle.8O
20 years from now they will be posting the same old same old.I think it's a conspiracy myself.
so, from what I can gather kakato, you believe a frail old man with failing kidneys, orchastrated the attacks on the wtc and pentagon via a cell fone from inside a cave.....somewhere?Like I said,they jump from one conspiracy to a new one,like clockwork,now their at the Bin Laden cycle.8O
20 years from now they will be posting the same old same old.I think it's a conspiracy myself.
so, from what I can gather kakato, you believe a frail old man with failing kidneys, orchastrated the attacks on the wtc and pentagon via a cell fone from inside a cave.....somewhere?
if you're interested, I have a beachfront property for sale
at low tide :roll:
-Faux friends and relatives of the faux passengers or just the faux relatives who claim to have been called by their loved ones or just the psyops who fooled relatives into thinking they really were their loved ones. (Pentagon)
Yeah I guess my uncle, aunt, and neighbour were all fake people, and I must be too. Disgusting.
Yes, and no it isn't conjecture. The bulk of the meat heads that think that 9/11 was a conspiracy by western powers, also believe Kennedy was assassinated by the CIA and the Mob, that UFO's a re real, and Lizard people live in the San Andrea mountains.Do they really or is that conjecture?
I didn't say everyone Petros. This is simply an attempt to negate a fact, by focusing on a small section of the demographic.Go to 9/11 Truth.org founded by the families of firefigters and cops and post on their site you think the families of firefighters who died on 9-11 and cops are Area 51 believers and JFK believers.
I have no idea. I don't actually care either. It's an interesting site though. Sadly the bulk of which has been sufficiently debunked countless times. I see they're still touting that nano thermite was found in the dust, even though that has already been shown to be a hoax, perpetrated to show how willing some people are to believe faulty science from sketchy sources. So long as it supports their conspiracy.How well would that go over?
Epic fail. They haven't lived up to that policy.EDITORIAL POLICY
We carefully review the articles, books, videos, sites and other resources published and linked on this site. Of the many works about 9/11 now in circulation, we strive to promote the best.
- We urge everyone to fact-check, engage in due diligence, and research issues from all angles. It is important to expose mistakes, and we are happy to correct our own when these occur.
- Some works about 9/11 forward ungrounded claims based on misinterpretations, distortions or even fabricated evidence. Others reveal racist or extremist biases. We avoid both types of distraction by focusing on the most promising lines of inquiry and bodies of evidence; those that have stood up to the scrutiny of peer review, have been subjected to expert analysis, and as a result are winning in the court of public opinion.
- Beyond issues of factual content, we prefer to disengage from individuals who employ vitriol or highly-charged rhetoric. We value positive and sober approaches over heavy-handed ones that might alienate potential allies.
Exactly.Wrong. I think they are wrong.
Although he wasn't a frail old man living in a cave at the time, I do like your typical exaggeration.so, from what I can gather kakato, you believe a frail old man with failing kidneys, orchastrated the attacks on the wtc and pentagon via a cell fone from inside a cave.....somewhere?
What question is that? There seems to be just 11 unanswered questions there.Who wants to tackle Question #20?
What's the point here?
I mean, one would have to be a fool to believe that idiotic tale that the American gov't came up with, and so far one would have to be just as much a fool to believe the conspiracy is as broad as to cover politicians, people that were in the buildings, cops, demolition people, airport workers, etc.
Have you seen its explanation as to why WTC7 fell down?What's so idiotic about the government account?
Have you seen its explanation as to why WTC7 fell down?
So your interest wasn't really in finding out what the gov't said, you wanted to know what I would say about what the gov't said about WTC 7? Why not just say that in the first place? Otherwise you could google the info just as well as I can.Buh bye
For one, the "fact" that all these terrorists were supposed to be under observation - even to hoisting brews in a peeler bar in celebration (odd for Islamic martyrs) - then managed to board four airplanes unobserved.
For another, the "fact" a student pilot who couldn't manage straight and level flight in a Cessna could manage to fly a jet at 35 thou on VFR into anything but the ground. No! Wait.... They dropped the student pilot cover when they realized how many holes were being poked in the tale....
Way too many inconsistencies. Why won't they just admit they were sloppy and screwed up?
So your interest wasn't really in finding out what the gov't said, you wanted to know what I would say about what the gov't said about WTC 7? Why not just say that in the first place? Otherwise you could google the info just as well as I can.