You are more fun than my favorite piece of Manhattan cheesecake,logic7.Why,oh why,would they not just invade Iran? Don't you have a parade to attend today?
Why The Towers Fell
- Thread starter I think not
- Start date
- Status
Listen to me very carefully you psychopathic piece of sh*t, whether you choose to believe or not, I was 150 feet away from the South Tower on 9/11, I saw people holding on to the outer steel girders and jumping to their deaths, when the south tower collapsed, the air pressure threw me down on the sidewalk, I thought I was gonna die by a steel beam flying off the building and hit me in the head.
If there is anyone on this forum that wanted to find out why all this happened, I have personal reasons because being part of that day, that I would have much more drive and an open mind to find out than anyone else.
It took me YEARS you f*cktard to end my research, I was on the ground, I have spoken to the families of the vicitms, I helped them search for their loved ones, I have read the 9/11 report, I have read every phuckin conspiracy theory out there, and they keep coming up with new and exciting "unaswered questions" when an old issue doesn't appeal anymore to the chronic brain dead.
There is nothing about 9/11 that has remained unaswered that can even remotely allude towards an inside job or false flag operation, if anyone makes that claim, that haven't researched jack sh*t.
I'm also quite sure people like you have NEVER even read the 9/11 report, you sit behind your computer monitor searching websites that can be created by 12 year old kids and lay claims to whatever the phuck they want. You claim you did research? Utter Bull****!
Your research is bound by your inexcusable pathetic lack of critical thought, it extends only so far as a click of a mouse and nothing more.
Keep reading your bull****, maybe some day you'll wake up and do some serious research.
If there is anyone on this forum that wanted to find out why all this happened, I have personal reasons because being part of that day, that I would have much more drive and an open mind to find out than anyone else.
It took me YEARS you f*cktard to end my research, I was on the ground, I have spoken to the families of the vicitms, I helped them search for their loved ones, I have read the 9/11 report, I have read every phuckin conspiracy theory out there, and they keep coming up with new and exciting "unaswered questions" when an old issue doesn't appeal anymore to the chronic brain dead.
There is nothing about 9/11 that has remained unaswered that can even remotely allude towards an inside job or false flag operation, if anyone makes that claim, that haven't researched jack sh*t.
I'm also quite sure people like you have NEVER even read the 9/11 report, you sit behind your computer monitor searching websites that can be created by 12 year old kids and lay claims to whatever the phuck they want. You claim you did research? Utter Bull****!
Your research is bound by your inexcusable pathetic lack of critical thought, it extends only so far as a click of a mouse and nothing more.
Keep reading your bull****, maybe some day you'll wake up and do some serious research.
"PATHETIC"
This does not show anything apart from the collapes
other BETTER video show SQUIBS ,and objects being thrown outwards and upwards ,
IM still waiting for your answer too
BUILDING 7
whoo hoo did i hit a nerve .!!!
no i dont think you even have a back bone pal
Lier you a f**king lier
is B/S and you know it and so do most people WITH A BRAIN THAT WORKS
More like your TV m8 you shown nobody here you so called exclusive evidence
I think it must have pal
Oh im soo sorry were you the only one affected by this.? i dont think you are you selfish S**THEAD
And believed every word you sad sheep
Don't you realise that the Internet is a great place to find information it happens to be the biggest library there is plus people from around the world not just America use it and express there opinions on it, many other countries wanted to find out about the wtc collapse too, maybe you should take your head out of your A*se and find out
Far more research can be done by clicking a mouse then you think m8
you have yet to have a single thought and if you have was it a loooong lonely journey
Critics Corner[SIZE=+2][/SIZE][SIZE=+1][/SIZE][SIZE=+2]"Common sense: If Dr. Wood didn't have anything credible to say, why would folks be attacking her so vehemently?"[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1](last updated July 13, 2007)
[/SIZE]Click on pictures to enlarge[SIZE=+1]([/SIZE][SIZE=+1]Also see the misinfo page.[/SIZE][SIZE=+1])[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]([/SIZE][SIZE=+1]Also see the disinfo page.[/SIZE][SIZE=+1])
[/SIZE]
How to recognize an OP/troll
July 20, 2007, by Dr. Judy Wood
[SIZE=+1]I. Articles Addressing Various Issues[/SIZE] [SIZE=-4]Top[/SIZE] How to recognize an OP/troll
July 20, 2007, by Dr. Judy Wood
Acting like a Grown-up
July 23, 2007, by Steven Jones, Ace Baker, Morgan Reynolds
Thoroughly Discredited
August 14, 2007, by Jeff Strahl
Greg Jenkins Panics: A Segment from the highly-funded Jenkins psyops
July 2, 2007
Hit Pieces in the J.O.N.E.S. -- Both direct and indirect
July 2, 2007
Transcript of "Micronukes vs Thermite/Thermate at WTC"
Transcript by Andrew Johnson, Footnotes mainly
by Andrew Johnson, with additional comments by Prof Judy Wood.
June 27, 2007
Reading Between The Lines -- Jenkins/Wood interview revisited,
Text, Subtext and The Truth About DEWs
10 April 2007, transcript by Andrew Lowe Watson, with added pictures & comments
Responses to the Greg Jenkins Attack Pieces
March 6, 2007, by bloggers
Email from Steven E. Jones to Greg Jenkins, recruiting Jenkins hit piece.
February 2, 2007
Steven Jones' Contributions to Science, Humanity and the Planet
January 29, 2007, by CB_Brooklyn
[SIZE=+1]II. Brief Rebuttals[/SIZE] [SIZE=-4]Top[/SIZE]
Vaporizing the World Trade Center
by Steven Dutch, last updated July 13, 2007
"His logic is circular and his information understates DEW capabilities by several orders of magnitude."
Discrediting By Association: Undermining the Case for Patriots Who Question 9/11
by Victoria Ashley, Version 1.1, August 5, 2007
Congratulations to Ms. Ashley for publishing an article in her area of expertise, an area in which she appears to thrive. Victoria Ashley does not have a degree in structural engineering, engineering mechanics (applied physics), materials engineering science, nor any other type of engineering degree. For that matter, she doesn't have a degree in any area of physical science.
List of Architects Who Have Questioned The Official Story of the Three WTC Collapses
Victoria Ashley (BA Architecture, MA Psychology)
Victoria Ashley, Psychology Researcher, BArch, Alameda, CA
So, what qualifies her to write such a piece? Her expertise is in PsyOps. Her MA (2004?) is in psychology and her area of expertise is neuro-linguistic programming. How interesting. She's actually one of the most qualified to write such a PsyOps hit piece.
;-)
Thoroughly Discredited
August 14, 2007, by Jeff Strahl
The World Trade Center Collapse: Waiting for a Fuse (source 2),
by Crockett Grabbe, September 22, 2001, [SIZE=-1](Revised: September 25, 2001)[/SIZE].
Grabbe, Crockett L. Space Weapons and the Strategic Defense Initiative. Ames, Iowa State University Press, 1991. 252 p.Book call no.: 358.80973 G727s
[SIZE=+1]III. "Peer-Reviewed" Articles Addressing Various Issues[/SIZE] [SIZE=-4]Top[/SIZE] A physicist critiques Steven Jones' new paper
21 May 2007, by Stephen Phillips, Ph.D.
Reading Between The Lines -- Jenkins/Wood interview revisited,
Text, Subtext and The Truth About DEWs
10 April 2007, transcript by Andrew Lowe Watson, with added pictures & comments
Dr. Greg Jenkins' "Directed Debunking Energy" and Prof. Judy Wood
1 March 2007, by Andrew Johnson
The New “9/11 Hijackers”?
February 2007, by Andrew Johnson
Why Indeed Must it be Controlled Demolition?
An informal critique of Dr. Jones' hypothesis
30 January 2007, "Who"
The Scientific Method Applied to the Thermite Hypothesis
14 December 2006, Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds
Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate?
23 Aug 2006, janedoe0911, Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood
Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate
23 Aug 2006, nomoregames.net, Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood, v. 1.0
[SIZE=+1]IV. Comments from Various Blogs.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-4]Top[/SIZE]
"Common sense: If Dr. Wood didn't have anything credible to say, why would folks be attacking her so vehemently?"
ChemBlog (Japanese?)
Contrail or Chemtrail, I never mind. They're always above us apparently and certainly.
The Very Strange Circumstances of the Greg Jenkins Interview with Judy Wood
[FONT=Times New Roman,Georgia,Times]Tuesday, March 06, 2007
[/FONT]
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/02/dustification.html
[FONT=Times New Roman,Georgia,Times]Sunday, February 18, 2007
[/FONT]
[SIZE=+1]V. Comments [/SIZE][SIZE=-4]Top[/SIZE]
Two Great Posts by "underscribed"
[FONT=Times New Roman,Georgia,Times]August 30, 2007
[/FONT]
Supporting Evidence for No-Planes and DEW (exotic weapons)
[FONT=Times New Roman,Georgia,Times]August 30, 2007[/FONT]
July 20, 2007, by Dr. Judy Wood
Acting like a Grown-up
July 23, 2007, by Steven Jones, Ace Baker, Morgan Reynolds
Thoroughly Discredited
August 14, 2007, by Jeff Strahl
Greg Jenkins Panics: A Segment from the highly-funded Jenkins psyops
July 2, 2007
Hit Pieces in the J.O.N.E.S. -- Both direct and indirect
July 2, 2007
Transcript of "Micronukes vs Thermite/Thermate at WTC"
Transcript by Andrew Johnson, Footnotes mainly
by Andrew Johnson, with additional comments by Prof Judy Wood.
June 27, 2007
Reading Between The Lines -- Jenkins/Wood interview revisited,
Text, Subtext and The Truth About DEWs
10 April 2007, transcript by Andrew Lowe Watson, with added pictures & comments
Responses to the Greg Jenkins Attack Pieces
March 6, 2007, by bloggers
Email from Steven E. Jones to Greg Jenkins, recruiting Jenkins hit piece.
February 2, 2007
Steven Jones' Contributions to Science, Humanity and the Planet
January 29, 2007, by CB_Brooklyn
[SIZE=+1]II. Brief Rebuttals[/SIZE] [SIZE=-4]Top[/SIZE]
Vaporizing the World Trade Center
by Steven Dutch, last updated July 13, 2007
"His logic is circular and his information understates DEW capabilities by several orders of magnitude."
Discrediting By Association: Undermining the Case for Patriots Who Question 9/11
by Victoria Ashley, Version 1.1, August 5, 2007
Congratulations to Ms. Ashley for publishing an article in her area of expertise, an area in which she appears to thrive. Victoria Ashley does not have a degree in structural engineering, engineering mechanics (applied physics), materials engineering science, nor any other type of engineering degree. For that matter, she doesn't have a degree in any area of physical science.
List of Architects Who Have Questioned The Official Story of the Three WTC Collapses
Victoria Ashley (BA Architecture, MA Psychology)
Victoria Ashley, Psychology Researcher, BArch, Alameda, CA
So, what qualifies her to write such a piece? Her expertise is in PsyOps. Her MA (2004?) is in psychology and her area of expertise is neuro-linguistic programming. How interesting. She's actually one of the most qualified to write such a PsyOps hit piece.
;-)
Thoroughly Discredited
August 14, 2007, by Jeff Strahl
Direct Evidence for Explosions: Flying Projectiles and Widespread Impact Damage
August 6, 2007, Dr. Crockett Grabbe
Blog comments on the above article by Dr. Grabbe
August 6, 2007, JREF forum
August 6, 2007, Dr. Crockett Grabbe
Blog comments on the above article by Dr. Grabbe
August 6, 2007, JREF forum
[empasis added]
"...The paper makes the assertion that certain photographs of the WTC collapse prove that explosions were responsible for the ejection of debris, but advances no evidence for the assertion. Pictures of damaged cars are produced more to refute the beam weapon theory than to promote the explosives theory; the damage is characterised as due to hot and possibly corrosive debris, but no evidence is advanced that this debris was not ejected as a result of glancing collisions in the collapse of the towers, or that the heating of the debris was not a result of the extensive pre-collapse fires.
In discussion of the "squibs", the key assertion that "overpressure is created by explosions" is not justified. The discussion of the radial distribution of debris is superfluous, as the ejection velocity has already been deduced from videos, and the comment that "it is likely that explosions are also occurring after the growing dust cloud envelopes the area" is pure speculation unsupported by evidence.
In summary, this paper is an attempt at proof by assertion, and no evidence is advanced to support its central thesis. ....
Refused for publication. Re-submission is not advised.
Dave"
"...The paper makes the assertion that certain photographs of the WTC collapse prove that explosions were responsible for the ejection of debris, but advances no evidence for the assertion. Pictures of damaged cars are produced more to refute the beam weapon theory than to promote the explosives theory; the damage is characterised as due to hot and possibly corrosive debris, but no evidence is advanced that this debris was not ejected as a result of glancing collisions in the collapse of the towers, or that the heating of the debris was not a result of the extensive pre-collapse fires.
In discussion of the "squibs", the key assertion that "overpressure is created by explosions" is not justified. The discussion of the radial distribution of debris is superfluous, as the ejection velocity has already been deduced from videos, and the comment that "it is likely that explosions are also occurring after the growing dust cloud envelopes the area" is pure speculation unsupported by evidence.
In summary, this paper is an attempt at proof by assertion, and no evidence is advanced to support its central thesis. ....
Refused for publication. Re-submission is not advised.
Dave"
The World Trade Center Collapse: Waiting for a Fuse (source 2),
by Crockett Grabbe, September 22, 2001, [SIZE=-1](Revised: September 25, 2001)[/SIZE].
Grabbe, Crockett L. Space Weapons and the Strategic Defense Initiative. Ames, Iowa State University Press, 1991. 252 p.Book call no.: 358.80973 G727s
[SIZE=+1]III. "Peer-Reviewed" Articles Addressing Various Issues[/SIZE] [SIZE=-4]Top[/SIZE] A physicist critiques Steven Jones' new paper
21 May 2007, by Stephen Phillips, Ph.D.
Reading Between The Lines -- Jenkins/Wood interview revisited,
Text, Subtext and The Truth About DEWs
10 April 2007, transcript by Andrew Lowe Watson, with added pictures & comments
Dr. Greg Jenkins' "Directed Debunking Energy" and Prof. Judy Wood
1 March 2007, by Andrew Johnson
The New “9/11 Hijackers”?
February 2007, by Andrew Johnson
Why Indeed Must it be Controlled Demolition?
An informal critique of Dr. Jones' hypothesis
30 January 2007, "Who"
The Scientific Method Applied to the Thermite Hypothesis
14 December 2006, Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds
Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate?
23 Aug 2006, janedoe0911, Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood
Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate
23 Aug 2006, nomoregames.net, Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood, v. 1.0
[SIZE=+1]IV. Comments from Various Blogs.[/SIZE] [SIZE=-4]Top[/SIZE]
"Common sense: If Dr. Wood didn't have anything credible to say, why would folks be attacking her so vehemently?"
ChemBlog (Japanese?)
Contrail or Chemtrail, I never mind. They're always above us apparently and certainly.
The Very Strange Circumstances of the Greg Jenkins Interview with Judy Wood
[FONT=Times New Roman,Georgia,Times]Tuesday, March 06, 2007
[/FONT]
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/02/dustification.html
[FONT=Times New Roman,Georgia,Times]Sunday, February 18, 2007
[/FONT]
[SIZE=+1]V. Comments [/SIZE][SIZE=-4]Top[/SIZE]
From Forums:
Two Great Posts by "underscribed"
[FONT=Times New Roman,Georgia,Times]August 30, 2007
[/FONT]
Supporting Evidence for No-Planes and DEW (exotic weapons)
[FONT=Times New Roman,Georgia,Times]August 30, 2007[/FONT]
What did you want, video of Pluto? The collapse is what we're talking about.
Oh yeah, the squibs. Those little puffs of air that brought down an entire section of building 40 stories above. :lol:
And what's unusual about objects being thrown outwards and upwards? Ever break a CD? The pieces go all over the place. I have a neat trick for you, I can make a tittly wink go outwards and upwards by pressing on it downwards!! I know it's hard to believe, but it's true.
The "squibs" have got to be one of the stupidest of the CT assertions of all. It's so obvious that it's air being blown out by the pressure inside. Sheesh. Obvious.
You won't do any better with building 7 either. There are threads here where it's already been picked apart. You'd be best to forget about it and not embarass yourself further.
Last edited:
What did you want, video of Pluto? The collapse is what we're talking about.
Oh yeah, the squibs. Those little puffs of air that brought down an entire section of building 40 stories above. :lol:
And what's unusual about objects being thrown outwards and upwards? Ever break a CD? The pieces go all over the place. I have a neat trick for you, I can make a tittly wink go outwards and upwards by pressing on it downwards!! I know it's hard to believe, but it's true.
The "squibs" have got to be one of the stupidest of the CT assertions of all. It's so obvious that it's air being blown out by the pressure inside. Sheesh. Obvious.
You won't do any better with building 7 either. There are threads here where it's already been picked apart. You'd be best to forget about it and not embarass yourself further.
Oh yeah, the squibs. Those little puffs of air that brought down an entire section of building 40 stories above. :lol:
happen to be explosions lower down in the building to effect the collapse ,and can be seen in almost every Good video they are not little puffs of smoke from broken windows like your trying to insinuate
the size of a aeroplane and landing soo far away and even embedding themselves in buildings 1/4 a mile away yea right.!
That's about your mentality isn't it playing kids games instead of clicking your mouse a few times
That's the worst video Ive seen,!!! as it shows such a small piece of the actual collapse, it is not even from the right angle to see it clearly enough, it must of taken you ages in you so called research to find that crap, your a debunker and you know it m8 I'm wise to you pal and you games your probably a mason and a NWO Muppet too ;-)What did you want, video of Pluto? The collapse is what we're talking about.
they have never been explained fully or satisfactorily
Why not a classic example of a controlled demolition, it even has the crease in the center to make it fall in on it self, and still you refuse to speak about it , its a well known fact that the CIA had a whole floor devoted to them, also is had special adaptation made to it to prevent fires, and such like occurring but yet there were small fires seen and it to was BLOWN TO BITS
I'm not embarrassed i see no reason to be so maybe you are as your reluctance to say any thing especial as you did extensive research (B/S)
Seriously, how come you're so thick, like de brick eh. Just the extremely unlikely (impossibility on a par with god) probability of coincidental systems failure of the 911 magnitude =certain inside conspiracy, without that inside action what you believe,( the official conspiracy scenario,) ammounts to a miracle. You are professionally disingenuous or terminally stupid or both.:lol:
:lol::laughing5::toothy5::compress::tongue::evil4::laughing4::laughing3:
Well you got me there, everyone knows it's so much easier and more cost effective to "PULL"
:lol::laughing5::toothy5::compress::tongue::evil4::laughing4:
Actually Just The Facts is right on the money it was a lot cheaper to demolish WTC7 than to pay the lawyers in SEC battles, it also cleaned up some other loose ends. It's what any competant conspiritor would do, keeps the dogs of yer trail.
:lol::laughing5::toothy5::compress::tongue::evil4::laughing4::laughing3:
Well you got me there, everyone knows it's so much easier and more cost effective to "PULL"
:lol::laughing5::toothy5::compress::tongue::evil4::laughing4:
It's also more cost effective to spend two trillion dollars on a war, instead we could have bought Saddam Hussein a palace made of gold and keep him there so we can have all the oil flow in our direction.
I think I have finally figured this whole conspiracy thing out. Bushco and his fiends(joos) are behind the whole 9/11 tragedy. They realized that the first step in their quest for world domination is to make sure the deep thinkers,those who think outside the box,those who are not afraid of the truth,must be kept occupied. So they created this mess we call 9/11 to pre-occupy the brains of their biggest enemy,the 'truthers' while they loot and plunder the rest of the planet. Aha,so to stop the evil Amerijoos,we must all leave this subject alone and focus on what is ahead.C'mon 'truthers' don't be a tool in the Bushco box.
- Status