No the internal structure of columns the ones in the center not elevator-shaft steel columns
Figure
That's an excellent pic Quandary!!!
Now can I explain what you're looking at? As in all tall building construction, the crane towers use the elevator shafts to rise with the construction platform.
So, if you look at what you've posted, you will note that the tower cranes are doing just that. As that is the elevator bank of the WTC.
The columns you see there, are not tied to the exoskeleton in the conventional way. IE; by cross girder bracing. In stead, trusses were used to lighten the internal construction. With the external frame as the load bearing mechanism.
True, the internal columns were load bearing, but only in so much so that they took the load of their own weigh and the structure immediately above them. Not the span load.
This is evident in the last few seconds of the buildings survival, as we witnessed the exterior walls being pulled inward, when the trusses were weakened by the fire and the weight upon them. Seeing as their load was primarily bore to the exterior, this is perfectly reasonable and expected.
Had the central columns been more then the skeletal body of the center elevator shaft. You would not likely have seen this manifest as it did on the exterior.
But hey, all 'experts' found by your heroes, know better then the Engineers at one of the worlds for most leading construction firms, Mohawk High Steel, ThyssenKrupp and NIST.
possibly cheaper but not what the prime directive of the event was set up to do which was to invade another country take control over their oilfield set up a puppet government have American bases nearer to eastern countries
But why? If there is supposedly more oil in the Alaskan basin, why waste all the time, money and lives to get oil for a higher cost then can readily withdrawn here on our own continent?
look Ive pasted different articles from lots of sources not just one and most of them have the agenda of finding out the truth unlike the commission's report which was total **** and you swallowed it hook line and sinker
Actually I did, but that's neither here nor there. My issue is with the faulty science and bs experts foisted as god like by people like you.
I didn't swallow the official line. I went out and asked those that know, my local Fire Dept, High Steel workers that actually worked on the Twin Towers, Architects, Engineers, some of which have extensive knowledge of the Twin Towers as well. I myself have actually tried my own experiments with steel stronger then that used in the WTC. At just over 800 degrees, under only 10 tons of pressure, I made an 'H' beam buckle.
I challenge you to find anyone that can prove that, that out come isn't an absolute fact.
This is all as easy for you to do, as it was for me. I have yet to meet anyone, that wasn't forth right and open in discussing what their truly professional opinion was.
so really your just sticking up for your pal anit you
You bet.
In your bias opinion.!!!! and because you don't know me your saying you know better well F**KYOU PAL.!!! i care not what you think or whether you THINK ITN has any veracity, honesty this again is only your bias opinion again B/S
How is it bias?
Because I disagree with you?
Or because I'm just plain smarter and able to do my own research?
Of course it is, it confounds you.
MOSTLEY COMING FROM YOU GUYS HERE AT THE MINUTE especialy you.!!!!
I dare you to refute any of my assertions, claims and facts. Even the resident Engineer hasn't done that.
it is doubtful that you who's name looks like your kid sister wrote it .
Actually my youngest boy, who was 11 or 10 at the time came up with it. I was looking for a new nic and my name is Bear and I am Canadian.
are you perplexed because you had to get her to read what a quandary is .
Not at all. I figured you out the minute I read your first post, you're in a quandary. You have no idea what reality and it has left you wallowoing in doubt.
and you just a c**ksucker m8 go suck his.!!!
Wow, that was mature. Do you have a phallic obsessive complex?
is that the royal we your using here i find lots of doubt in him and i may add you also.!!
Again, of course you do, you have no idea what reality is, thus your grasping of half baked theories, complete with lies and vacuous nonsense to back them up.
so that makes him qualify for what building steel. a glorified blacksmith, who does not know all there is to know about what happened, Ive shown other experts analysis, and you have rejected it out of hand, but because he says he's a steel worker, you all bow down to his superior knowledge ,do is see titles in front of his name PHDs no i don't ,so he knows not about jet airplanes fuel or it seems anything else his arguments about this are as miss informed as yours are colpy.!!! he is only
able to come up with his bias opinion as he you and itn are m8s that's clear ,i don't see anything apart from sarcasm from you lot and you own bias about me
True, I'm no Phd, I'm no expert. But what I do know, I came to on my own research. Nothing was spoon fed me by some web site.
Here's the simplest thing you can do to start the ball of knowledge rolling in your head...
Call your local Fire Dept. and ask them if a dumpster fire can and will melt a dumpster...
I bet the answer will actually shock you, then cause you to claim they're cock suckers and in on the conspiracy. Or their my friends too. And that just negates their official knowledge.
Figure
