Why The Towers Fell

[quandary121]

Congress and the On-Going Cover-Up of 9/11
Furthermore, the 110th Congress took no action to ensure that all government agencies will collaborate with the National Archives, in fulfillment of the 9/11 Commission’s commitment to release its supporting records to the public in 2009.78 A law to ensure this is badly needed.
The FBI has been declassifying documents cooperatively with respect to this commitment, and recently the CIA has begun to cooperate as well.79 But some federal agencies, notably the FAA and Pentagon, are not collaborating with the 9/11 Commission’s commitment at all. It may take a law to get them to do so. Both the FAA and the Pentagon declined to release important records to the 9/11 Commission, despite its statutory powers, until required to do so by judicial subpoena.80 But the law which created the 9/11 Commission in 2002 made no legal determination for the future of its records.81
This is a matter of concern, because 9/11 has clearly initiated a major readjustment of our traditional constitutional balances and civil rights. I submit that a vigorous defense of the constitutional traditions of this country requires vigorous pressure for the release of the 9/11 Commission’s records, so that we can begin to resolve the mysteries of how this constitutional crisis arose.

 

[CDNBear]

Quandry, you might want to acknowledge the source of your cut and pastes. Giving credit to those whom actually wrote it.

 

[quandary121]

The photographs below were taken within 24 to 48 hours of the September 11, 2001 attacks look at the size of these metal remains why are they soo small in size small sections of the collapsed building.??? why.???

now the pentagon no plane wings or tail fin to be seen any where

 

[quandary121]

Quandry, you might want to acknowledge the source of your cut and pastes. Giving credit to those whom actually wrote it.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=theme&themeId=18
The Military Drills of September 11th: Why a New Investigation is Needed

look whether i give you proof or not you say the sites i go to for my info are quaks, why should i show you anything just so you can call the authors nut jobs, i have given you the links any how, but yet again you will deny the credibility of any thing i post as you have done this all along

 

[CDNBear]

The photographs below were taken within 24 to 48 hours of the September 11, 2001 attacks look at the size of these metal remains why are they soo small in size small sections of the collapsed building.??? why.???

now the pentagon no plane wings or tail fin to be seen any where

 

[quandary121]

October 11, 2001

One Month After the World Trade Center Collapses, Smoke Still Rises.

WTC photos taken October 11, 2001.why.???????

 

[CDNBear]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=theme&themeId=18
The Military Drills of September 11th: Why a New Investigation is Needed

look whether i give you proof or not you say the sites i go to for my info are quaks, why should i show you anything just so you can call the authors nut jobs, i have given you the links any how, but yet again you will deny the credibility of any thing i post as you have done this all along

It's called copyright infringement.

 

[CDNBear]

October 11, 2001

One Month After the World Trade Center Collapses, Smoke Still Rises.

WTC photos taken October 11, 2001.why.???????

Haven't any of you CT meatballs ever heard of an air tight wood burning stove?

Holy ****, this is stuff my kids even understand!!!

 

[quandary121]

http://www.september11news.com/AftermathImages.htm

what got nothing to say just your pointless pictures
you are a bloody idiot.!!!!
i show you things you then cannot explain any thing about the proof shown.!!! then act like you know all
you know jack ****

CDNBear where is your big mouth now

 

[quandary121]

Haven't any of you CT meatballs ever heard of an air tight wood burning stove?

Holy ****, this is stuff my kids even understand!!!

air tight wood burning stove

there's no such thing for a fire to work it needs air are you a complete fool smoke has to go some where it needs an escape from a flue or a chimney

 

[CDNBear]

http://www.september11news.com/AftermathImages.htm

what got nothing to say just your pointless pictures
you are a bloody idiot.!!!!
i show you things you then cannot explain any thing about the proof shown.!!! then act like you know all
you know jack ****

CDNBear where is your big mouth now

Choking on coffee, while reading your insanity.

You asked an absolutely asinine question about the size of the debris. If you knew anything but what you've been programmed to ask and spoon fed, you'ld know how much of a stupid question that is.

 

[CDNBear]

there's no such thing for a fire to work it needs air are you a complete fool smoke has to go some where it needs an escape from a flue or a chimney

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]Wood was Canada's original heating fuel. Wood burning continues to be an effective and economical way to heat your home – as a primary heating source or as a secondary heating source to complement conventional oil or gas furnaces, or electric baseboards.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]Advances in Wood Burning[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]Major advances in the 1990s have made wood burning cleaner and more effective, efficient and convenient than ever. The following are some of these advances:[/FONT]

• [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]combustion designs that can burn more of the wood – and burn it more cleanly and at higher efficiencies;[/FONT]
• [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]performance standards (CSA B415.1 and EPA 1990) that identify newer, cleaner-burning units;[/FONT]
• [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]technology that provides more efficient heating while allowing you to view the flame from behind a special ceramic glass door that will stay clear for long periods;[/FONT]
• [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]pellet stoves that use compressed wood and other biomass wastes, capable of providing at least 24 hours of unattended, automated heating;[/FONT]
• [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]standards that provide clear guidelines for safe installation; and[/FONT]
• [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]professional training programs for installers and inspectors to ensure that you get dependable advice and service.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica]As recently as the mid-1970s, basement wood furnaces or simple box stoves burned most of the wood in homes. Then came the evolution to airtight stoves, which were more efficient but created more air pollution. Pressured by environmental observers over the issue of smoke pollution, stove designers began to develop cleaner-burning products. By the early 1990s, Canadian manufacturers led the way, and new products reached the market.[/FONT]

Link

See? I do know more then you've been spoon fed.

Do you want more links to how and what an airtight stove is and how it works?

I found hundreds, but then again, I could just take a pic of the one in my living room too, moron.

 

[CDNBear]

Here's a list a manufacturers and distributors of airtight wood burning stoves...

http://www.ctidirectory.com/Search/product_company_list.cfm?prod_code=7421700

 

[CDNBear]

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]Air tight stoves (or anything which is air tight, such as a fireplace or insert), slowly allows air to combine with the wood. This allows the fire to be controlled, and to last for 6 to 8 hours, building up heat inside the firebox. This hot firebox temperature causes the mass of cast iron, steel, or soapstone to soak up the heat, and to radiate or convect the heat into the house. [/FONT]

Link

I'ld say, as with most dumpster fires, the combustibles buried beneath tons of rubble, were indeed oxygen starved, thus creating the same effect as an airtight wood burning stove.

Again, not rocket science, easily understood and acknowledge by the children in this home or most with a wood burning stove of this type.

 

[EagleSmack]

The towers fell because Israeli demolition crews set charges at the behest of the bankers who required a wider sphere of warfare.

Sounds good to me. Case closed I think! :lol:

 

[EagleSmack]

the use of thermite provides a credible explanation for the fires, hot spots and molten steel and why they removed the evidence as sulfer evidence would have been shown to be present ,the fact that concrete turned to dust also explicitly shows the use of explosives, bits of concrete and metal being thrown in the air during the collapse proves the use of explosives.!!!

You do know that thermite is NOT an explosive. It might sound all scary and such but it does not explode...it burns.

 

[EagleSmack]

the cuts shape proves demolition also notice the molten metal around the cut.!

more cuts.!!!!

a close up of the cut and molten metal

These pics were taken long after the event and have been proven as such. Welders were cutting all over the site after 9/11. Look at the backhoe for crying out loud!

 

[EagleSmack]

Quandary you've brought some strong arguments to this topic that can't be put down without equally strong arguments from the other side which have not been forthcoming. I have always hovered a bit ....I mean I watched the aircraft hit the towers on 9/11 maybe fifty seven times. Building 7 went down so smooth it always looked like a professional job to me but I couldn't get my head around the sheer size if the conspiracy required to pull it off. To me, this is the strongest argument against any kind of conspiracy. By now half the conspirators would have written a book about the damn thing.

No...you saw holograms.

 

[CDNBear]

You do know that thermite is NOT an explosive. It might sound all scary and such but it does not explode...it burns.

You're trying to convince some that believes there's no such thing as airtight wood burning stoves, that thermite isn't an explosive?

You are a hard case Eagle!!!

 

[quandary121]

Link

See? I do know more then you've been spoon fed.

Do you want more links to how and what an airtight stove is and how it works?

I found hundreds, but then again, I could just take a pic of the one in my living room too, moron.

look IDIOT you cannot have a stove that has a visible flame "without air" it may have an air tight door it may even be air tight but for a flame to exist it "needs air" i lived on the road with agypsy caravan for 14 years pal and i had a stove too surprising enough your arguement is rubish like all your arguements