Why The Towers Fell

Status
Not open for further replies.

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
So, what you are saying is that the imaginary demolition crew, which would have taken 30,000 hours at least to plant the 2700 lbs of explosives on the beam structure necessary to daintily collapse the buildings, actually planted the tons and tons of explosives necessary to blow the concrete shell of the building to smithereens.

Without anyone noticing.

Linear thought ain't exactly your strong suit, is it?
As near as I can figure,the answer to that little puzzle is"George Bush'es brother ran the security company". Which is inaccurate and does not answer the question,but to the tinfoil crowd,the actual implementation of the explosives is not important. Even though it is by far the most important aspect of a controlled demolition..... The fact that almost 7 years later and not one scrap of paper or recorded conversation from the thousands involved in the event or cover-up has ever surfaced doesn't bother them either. They explain that by saying that 'Bushco' is very powerful.It is probably best to leave these people alone,sooner or later they will grow up,maybe even get laid,and move on to the real world . If not,well at least they are not going to be breeding any more than the trekkies.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Quandary, please don't cut and paste in anywhere near that volume. Member p/c's are crashing. Make a point and put a small amount of quoted content and a link (not a pile of them) to the specific point you made. Thank you.
 

quandary121

Time Out
Apr 20, 2008
2,950
8
38
lincolnshire
uk.youtube.com
Quandary, please don't cut and paste in anywhere near that volume. Member p/c's are crashing. Make a point and put a small amount of quoted content and a link (not a pile of them) to the specific point you made. Thank you.

sorry i was just trying to prove to others the facts that they are missing i understand that these cut/paste remarks are not wanted i will put links instead thaks for pointing this out
 

quandary121

Time Out
Apr 20, 2008
2,950
8
38
lincolnshire
uk.youtube.com
You know what quandry, don't even bother answering my questions because you will revert back to what you have been saying, actually correction, what you have been cutting and pasting. Lone wolf siad it best, you're not looking for debate, you're looing for agreement.

You have obviously developed into quite the expert, you're a demolition expert, your knowledge of gravity and free fall speeds are obviously worthy of a PhD and your interpretation of cut steel is obviously viewed with an experienced eye.

You're swift to shoot down anyone that tows the mainstream line, and yet you cut and paste from websites that you have no clue how credible the information is or what their field of expertise is, for all you know, those websites have been created by me to rake up money from web hits.

No no, you're not looking for the truth, you just cling to the alternate theory becuase your brain cannot egenrate enough energy to process any information that is against your bias.

I'll bet you cling to every single conspiracy theory because it is simply within your nature.

Enjoy your diatribe.

You have no idea about me pal, you never answer any thing Ive asked you, when i show you credible proof you answer with this sort of cop out answer ,Ive researched this far more than you have your the one who said you know about explosions not me, i proved to you about the planes used in the attack, also i proved to you about the free fall, i also proved to you about controlled demolitions, you cant handle the truth, you go to your debunking sites to dis prove what Ive said, and have no answers ,nothing you have ever said rings true ,and you do exactly the same as i do when you feel that some one has agreed to your comment .
Ive cut and pasted because it proves valid a point to the argument, animatedly i should not use soo many, but talking to you is like trying to educate pork, you so far up your self pal its unbelievable, you never talk about building 7 because that proves controlled demolition , you cant prove me wrong cos you know I'm right you have met you nemesis and YOU CANT HANDLE IT.
 

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
look stop trying to twist what i say around to make your self look smart,

Making a simple observation is not twisting what you say, it's taking what you said and demonstrating how easy it is to refute.

it clearly falls in on it self ,it does not tip over or fall in one direction

Buildings don't fall over like trees, no matter what. Period. The fact that the WTC towers didn't fall over like trees proves only one thing....that they weren't trees. They behaved exactly the way you would expect a building to behave.
 
Last edited:

quandary121

Time Out
Apr 20, 2008
2,950
8
38
lincolnshire
uk.youtube.com
http://www.911myths.com/html/freefall.html

Where did you get the 96 second figure?

The amount of floors in the building, the approximate time taken for the floor to collapse, when the floors above hits into them, speed of decent verses free fall ,if it takes 8-9 seconds for the free falling building to collapse, it is natural to assume that if you add just one second for each subsequent floor to be hit in a 110 storey building and give way, this would equate to the approximate time taken, for the pancake theory theory to be correct it should of taken around the 96 second mark do you not agree,and as this was not the case,the pancake theory is B/S. As it only took a maximum of 10 seconds to fall explain to me why it fell soo quickly then.????
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
You have no idea about me pal, you never answer any thing Ive asked you,

You have actually asked something? It must have gotten buried amongst your incessant cut and pastes.

when i show you credible proof you answer with this sort of cop out answer

Credible proof? 8O Please explain how any of this garbage is credible?

Ive researched this far more than you have your the one who said you know about explosions not me

I never said I knew anything about explosions, you're thinking about CDNBear, then again, you are confused about reality, so no worries.

also i proved to you about the free fall, i also proved to you about controlled demolitions, you cant handle the truth, you go to your debunking sites to dis prove what Ive said, and have no answers ,nothing you have ever said rings true ,and you do exactly the same as i do when you feel that some one has agreed to your comment .

Hey light head, you haven't proved jack ****, all you have done is cut and paste articles that adhere to bias. You absolutely refuse to acknowledge any real scientific data whatsoever if it does not conform to your views. You are incapable of critical thought, you endless cut and pastes about every conspiracy theory known to man pretty much sums up what you're all about.

I haven't figured out if you're just starving for attention or you're just plain stupid.

Ive cut and pasted because it proves valid a point to the argument, animatedly i should not use soo many, but talking to you is like trying to educate pork, you so far up your self pal its unbelievable, you never talk about building 7 because that proves controlled demolition , you cant prove me wrong cos you know I'm right you have met you nemesis and YOU CANT HANDLE IT.

:lol: Well I guess the game is up, you GOT ME! :lol:
 

quandary121

Time Out
Apr 20, 2008
2,950
8
38
lincolnshire
uk.youtube.com
So, what you are saying is that the imaginary demolition crew, which would have taken 30,000 hours at least to plant the 2700 lbs of explosives on the beam structure necessary to daintily collapse the buildings, actually planted the tons and tons of explosives necessary to blow the concrete shell of the building to smithereens.

Without anyone noticing.

Linear thought ain't exactly your strong suit, is it?


2700 lbs of explosives

where did you get this figure from.??

blow the concrete shell of the building to smithereens
And this is what explosives do they turned a massive building into dust

30,000 hours

this is another abstract figure you have come up with i already told you about supposed redecorating that was going on months in advance of the date of the collapse

Linear thought ain't exactly your strong suit, is it?

Your wrong pal this is where i look at this from, a totally different way to what you are capable of doing, as you fail to see that this was a false flag operation, to invade Iran, and why invade Iran." OIL" that was the only reason "OIL"
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Your wrong pal this is where i look at this from, a totally different way to what you are capable of doing, as you fail to see that this was a false flag operation, to invade Iran, and why invade Iran." OIL" that was the only reason "OIL"

I can't say I completely agree here. False flag operation overlooked from within?... Okay. For oil? Everyone knows Bush is a Texas oil man. Thing is, Uncle Sam immediately went after some Bin laden guy known to be associated with Afghanistan. Seems while that machinery was in motion, some of it made a left turn.
 

quandary121

Time Out
Apr 20, 2008
2,950
8
38
lincolnshire
uk.youtube.com
You have actually asked something? It must have gotten buried amongst your incessant cut and pastes.



Credible proof? 8O Please explain how any of this garbage is credible?



I never said I knew anything about explosions, you're thinking about CDNBear, then again, you are confused about reality, so no worries.



Hey light head, you haven't proved jack ****, all you have done is cut and paste articles that adhere to bias. You absolutely refuse to acknowledge any real scientific data whatsoever if it does not conform to your views. You are incapable of critical thought, you endless cut and pastes about every conspiracy theory known to man pretty much sums up what you're all about.

I haven't figured out if you're just starving for attention or you're just plain stupid.



:lol: Well I guess the game is up, you GOT ME! :lol:


Credible proof? 8O Please explain how any of this garbage is credible?

if you bothered to look at any of the things that Ive cut and pasted you will see they ARE from credible people you are the one who started this thread are you not,? more of you f**king B/S patter your the oneyour are confused about reality here you also reckoned you had
breakfast in the promenade..
more of you delusional ramblings


Show me another building that had the same exo skeletal design that the WTC had, and caught fire since
i have done and still you refuse too admit your wrong

They were big enough for people to plunge to their deaths rather than face the fire within, and fires were raging from impact to collapse.

if this was so if you looked at evidence Ive cut/pasted you would see a woman clinging to a steel girder that you reckon would be molten

I never said I knew anything about explosions, you're thinking about CDNBear
Tell me how much thermite is needed to cause such an explosion/cut. Your answer has to be in TONS and VOLUME.

short memory you have m8
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Your wrong pal this is where i look at this from, a totally different way to what you are capable of doing, as you fail to see that this was a false flag operation, to invade Iran, and why invade Iran." OIL" that was the only reason "OIL"

And they waited nearly two years after the false flag operation? Now this is going to be interesting, according to you and your fellow CT's, ALL invasions or interventions were conducted immediately after the alleged false flag operation.

Please explain.
 

quandary121

Time Out
Apr 20, 2008
2,950
8
38
lincolnshire
uk.youtube.com
I can't say I completely agree here. False flag operation overlooked from within?... Okay. For oil? Everyone knows Bush is a Texas oil man. Thing is, Uncle Sam immediately went after some Bin laden guy known to be associated with Afghanistan. Seems while that machinery was in motion, some of it made a left turn.


Bin laden was a scape goat for the war on terror, they thought this up months before, i dare say years before ,they knew that oil reserves would be getting low, so they had to find a way of stealing Iran's oil ,they enraged the public into thinking that Arabs did this ,thus getting the public support to start a war," false flag " the war on terror
 

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
if this was so if you looked at evidence Ive cut/pasted you would see a woman clinging to a steel girder that you reckon would be molten

No YOU would recon it would be molten, it's the CT's who keep talking about the melting point of steel. And the video of the Cintern woman was early on. There were lots of people hanging out the window ledge early on too, waving to be seen. What happened to them as time went on? Got bored and went back in the building?

Seriously, give it some thought.
 

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
To invade Iran,hmmm,you are one smart cookie!!!!! Did you mean Iraq perchance? Which is wrong also,but what the hey,we are all part of the plot to discredit the people like you who know the truth. Be afraid,be very afraid,Bush has only a few months to get all the truthers. Don't leave mommy's basement until Obama tells you the coast is clear.
 

quandary121

Time Out
Apr 20, 2008
2,950
8
38
lincolnshire
uk.youtube.com
And they waited nearly two years after the false flag operation? Now this is going to be interesting, according to you and your fellow CT's, ALL invasions or interventions were conducted immediately after the alleged false flag operation.

Please explain.

EXCUSE ME WHERE HAVE I EVER SAID
ALL invasions or interventions were conducted immediately after the alleged false flag operation
I HAVE NOT YOU HAVE

An operation of this magnitude must of taken place months maybe years before, in the planning, they had to get public opinion on board, to continue further, this is not just one event in the history of what they are intending, you think one thing at a time when you should be looking at many events that have lead to this, such as the WMD b/s about Saddam ,the London bombings the pentagon attack ,you are blind pal to the real truths because this is what you have been told to believe and like a good little sheep you DO.!!!!
 

quandary121

Time Out
Apr 20, 2008
2,950
8
38
lincolnshire
uk.youtube.com
To invade Iran,hmmm,you are one smart cookie!!!!! Did you mean Iraq perchance? Which is wrong also,but what the hey,we are all part of the plot to discredit the people like you who know the truth. Be afraid,be very afraid,Bush has only a few months to get all the truthers. Don't leave mommy's basement until Obama tells you the coast is clear.


To invade Iran,hmmm,you are one smart cookie!!!!! Did you mean Iraq perchance
No i did not you Muppet i meant Iran that's where the oil is and they invaded Iraq first so that American bases could be set up and a considerable military presence in Iraq would make invading IRAN easier. domino theory pal after one collapse they would then move on to the next objective you don't see the big picture your eyes are too close together.:lol:
 

wallyj

just special
May 7, 2006
1,230
21
38
not in Kansas anymore
Redecorating!!!!!! I haven't heard that one yet. I can imagine 'redecorators' cutting through drywall to plant explosives and no one objecting. " Nothing to see hear sir,just a little sprucing up of your office" "What,you don't remember hiring the company? Well sir,you better read your lease again,the fine print says that George Bush'es brother can order redecorating whenever he likes." Why are we cutting the drywall and wiring these packages together if we are redecorators? Well never you mind,and please don't tell anyone about this,ever,or we will come back and put you in a missile and fire you into the pentagon. Now carry on good citizen". :roll::roll::roll::roll:
 

quandary121

Time Out
Apr 20, 2008
2,950
8
38
lincolnshire
uk.youtube.com
No YOU would recon it would be molten, it's the CT's who keep talking about the melting point of steel. And the video of the Cintern woman was early on. There were lots of people hanging out the window ledge early on too, waving to be seen. What happened to them as time went on? Got bored and went back in the building?

Seriously, give it some thought.

what do you mean i said .?
your the one trying to prove it was the fires that brought down this building not me
 

quandary121

Time Out
Apr 20, 2008
2,950
8
38
lincolnshire
uk.youtube.com
Redecorating!!!!!! I haven't heard that one yet. I can imagine 'redecorators' cutting through drywall to plant explosives and no one objecting. " Nothing to see hear sir,just a little sprucing up of your office" "What,you don't remember hiring the company? Well sir,you better read your lease again,the fine print says that George Bush'es brother can order redecorating whenever he likes." Why are we cutting the drywall and wiring these packages together if we are redecorators? Well never you mind,and please don't tell anyone about this,ever,or we will come back and put you in a missile and fire you into the pentagon. Now carry on good citizen". :roll::roll::roll::roll:

If i could find the documantary evidence of what these people said i would as i cant you can
say what you like your a idiot i can tell and no amount of proof will convice a fool will it fool
 
Status
Not open for further replies.