Is that your way of saying no female (real or imagined) has made it through to become a SEAL?Girls and Canucks can't be SEALs. Only monly mons and true-blue Murkans. Cuz they're superior. Gawd made 'em that way.
Is it like “A boy named Sue” that went through BUDS as a man but now is a woman? If so do we give the name that was used then or the name used now? Is this one of those questions?Can anyone name the first female Navy Seal?
Girls and Canucks can't be SEALs. Only monly mons and true-blue Murkans. Cuz they're superior. Gawd made 'em that way.
I’ll just wait for the punchline.Is that your way of saying no female (real or imagined) has made it through to become a SEAL?
Has a woman ever passed Bud S?
0% - no female has ever graduated from BUD/S, much less become a SEAL.Oct 9, 2023
Punchline? No DEI allowed?Is it like “A boy named Sue” that went through BUDS as a man but now is a woman? If so do we give the name that was used then or the name used now? Is this one of those questions?
I’ll just wait for the punchline.
No idea. That’s why I’m waiting for the punchline.Punchline? No DEI allowed?
But at least one has made Canadian Special Infantry.Is that your way of saying no female (real or imagined) has made it through to become a SEAL?
Has a woman ever passed Bud S?
0% - no female has ever graduated from BUD/S, much less become a SEAL.Oct 9, 2023
A buddy from the Legion made her way through. One of the first or the first female medics in the CF. Goes by Rocky. Awards from the Queen and all that shit. If you were only half the man she is I'd tip my to hat to ya.But at least one has made Canadian Special Infantry.
Guess your monly-mon standards are pretty low.
I blame True Dope.
I can’t even name the first male navy seal why would I care ?Can anyone name the first female Navy Seal?
Physiological differences between women and men.I can’t even name the first male navy seal why would I care ?
Actually, the US Rangers have recently lowered their standards for women to join. I only have one problem with women in combat roles and it has nothing to do with whether they're capable because several of them have already proven they are. It's what happens to them if they get captured that's the problem.But at least one has made Canadian Special Infantry.
Guess your monly-mon standards are pretty low.
I blame True Dope.
That’s why you always save the last bullet.Actually, the US Rangers have recently lowered their standards for women to join. I only have one problem with women in combat roles and it has nothing to do with whether they're capable because several of them have already proven they are. It's what happens to them if they get captured that's the problem.
Up to 14 per cent of the more than 2,200 Canadian special forces personnel are women, a percentage Maj-Gen Rouleau said he wants to increase to 25 per cent.Actually, the US Rangers have recently lowered their standards for women to join. I only have one problem with women in combat roles and it has nothing to do with whether they're capable because several of them have already proven they are. It's what happens to them if they get captured that's the problem.
Yeah, but how many women would actually be serving in combat roles? For most modern armies and air forces only 10% of the personnel do the actual shooting. The rest are "REMFs"Up to 14 per cent of the more than 2,200 Canadian special forces personnel are women, a percentage Maj-Gen Rouleau said he wants to increase to 25 per cent.
That figure would be in line with the overall direction of the Canadian military, which has set the same goal.
"We're an equal opportunity employer," said Rouleau. "We'd love to have more women in the force."
Rouleau noted a handful of women currently serve in both the special forces command and the unit that responds to chemical, biological and radioactive incidents.
A few have even tried out for JTF-2, but none have gone on to take the training course, because they failed to qualify, he said.
Sooner or later a trans will do it and it will be the greatest thing since 4 ply toilet paper.
Slavic women have proven themselves capable.....80 years ago.Yeah, but how many women would actually be serving in combat roles? For most modern armies and air forces only 10% of the personnel do the actual shooting. The rest are "REMFs"
Yeah, I wasn't at all suggesting they were incapable, especially in the case of Slavic women (and men) who were fighting to survive a war of extinction against them. That can be kind of a motivating factor. But I'm talking about Western militaries whose opponents tend to be pretty fucking uncivilized when it comes to the treatment of PoWs.Slavic women have proven themselves capable.....80 years ago.
Men get raped as POWs too. Even the ugly ones.Yeah, I wasn't at all suggesting they were incapable, especially in the case of Slavic women (and men) who were fighting to survive a war of extinction against them. That can be kind of a motivating factor. But I'm talking about Western militaries whose opponents tend to be pretty fucking uncivilized when it comes to the treatment of PoWs.
Likely only because there aren't any women around.Men get raped as POWs too. Even the ugly ones.
Men get raped as POWs too. Even the ugly ones.
Or perhaps the ugly men just win the Mr. Congeniality ribbons.Likely only because there aren't any women around.