2SLGBTQQIA+
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
Take the pants off and show the testicles.
Yeah, at the first tiktok, I dare anyone to deny that's a guy
Well then; about fucking time.
And just a bit of advanced FYI - this involves a drag KING, not Queen. Not that it should matter but, well, the focus usually is on the Queens and people tend to forget the Kings.
pressprogress.ca
I suggest page 11 as a start for why the judge ruled as they did.
This'll be interesting to see if being called groomer will lead to more defamation suits and maybe even convictions.
And just a bit of advanced FYI - this involves a drag KING, not Queen. Not that it should matter but, well, the focus usually is on the Queens and people tend to forget the Kings.
Right-Wing Trolls Are Freaking Out After Learning They Can Get Sued for Calling People ‘Groomers’ on the Internet
New court decision reinforces that there is no public interest in speech that exposes vulnerable groups to hate
pressprogress.ca
I suggest page 11 as a start for why the judge ruled as they did.
This'll be interesting to see if being called groomer will lead to more defamation suits and maybe even convictions.
Shows how out off touch with reality non elected judges can be.Well then; about fucking time.
And just a bit of advanced FYI - this involves a drag KING, not Queen. Not that it should matter but, well, the focus usually is on the Queens and people tend to forget the Kings.
Right-Wing Trolls Are Freaking Out After Learning They Can Get Sued for Calling People ‘Groomers’ on the Internet
New court decision reinforces that there is no public interest in speech that exposes vulnerable groups to hate
I suggest page 11 as a start for why the judge ruled as they did.
This'll be interesting to see if being called groomer will lead to more defamation suits and maybe even convictions.
LOL - show us you read nothing about the judgement without outright saying so.
The case of defamation is still going forward because the dipshit who thought he could defame people didn't present his case well enough to get the judge on his side.
Well that, and that what he said HAD nothing to do with his argument that it was 'free speech'.
Or are you suggesting that we can now defame people without consequence?
The woke crowd does it all the time with anyone that disagrees with their wacko ideas.
Go read the judgment; it had nothing to do with 'woke judges' but actual application of law.
And no, the "woke crowd" doesn't do it "all the time".
But when you are called something that you are not, and that thing can destroy your life, yeah, a person has every right to sue the one who defamed them.
Or again, are you all for people being defamed without consequence?
You disagree with them all the time. What horrors have been visited upon you?
It's pretty classic libel.Well then; about fucking time.
And just a bit of advanced FYI - this involves a drag KING, not Queen. Not that it should matter but, well, the focus usually is on the Queens and people tend to forget the Kings.
Right-Wing Trolls Are Freaking Out After Learning They Can Get Sued for Calling People ‘Groomers’ on the Internet
New court decision reinforces that there is no public interest in speech that exposes vulnerable groups to hate
I suggest page 11 as a start for why the judge ruled as they did.
This'll be interesting to see if being called groomer will lead to more defamation suits and maybe even convictions.
Pretty much, but certain people seem to think it's okay because they're Drag Kings/Queens and thus exempt or something.
Not even close. You burned the pizza.