Pierre Poilievre’s callous courting of Canada’s ‘deplorables’ (left wing in full panic mode)
- Thread starter The_Foxer
- Start date
You do appear to be correct there. The democrats spent vastly more money than Trump did. ALmost double what trump spent. So... if anything it shows you CAN'T buy an election.
Report: Hillary Clinton Spent $1.2 Billion to Lose 2016 Election
Hillary Clinton could have bought a decent-sized chunk of New York real estate with the $1.2 billion that she raised and spent for her losing election, according to a new report by the New York Post. | Politics
www.breitbart.com
We're not interested in your sex life, thanks.
You'll note I stated the characteristics the leftists says he has, not that he actually has them. I don't think racists are prone to restoring the funding to Historically Black Colleges and Universities that the previous BLACK president cut.
Trump never declared a national emergency just because the "peons" had the fucking temerity to protest against him. Even when the leftist fags were burning US cities down and engaging in insurrections in Seattle and Portland.
Trump never obstructed justice (unless you count the Democrats attempt at kangaroo justice).
Trump believed in less govt. Leftists like Socks want to control every aspect of our lives, right down to telling us what the fuck to eat and how to shop.
Was Trump a great president? Not really. But he outclasses Trudeau in almost every way. And he was definitely better than Obama or Dubya, or Clinton.
And what part about that talked about sex life?
Really Jin, if you're curious about what I do in my private life, ask in PM's. Sheesh.
Reread your post in the light of that you were talking about your sex life. You will see his homour then. And it was a joke. I doubt he really cares.
Oh I know he doesn't care and I know what he meant.
I'm not THAT much of an idiot, despite rumors
Yeah... i don't know what the hell to make of the whole thing. It's kind of hard to imagine that in a country of 350 million people, trump clinton and sleepy joe were the best choices they could put forward.
Of course they do. Being nice to Black people doesn't mean you're not a racist.
Many slave-holders truly loved some of their slaves (Thomas Jefferson is a prime example). But held them as slaves.
Well it's quite common here in canada, and there's nothing wrong with it inherently. But trump DID kind of make a big deal about how he spent his own money to do it and therefore wasn't beholden to anyone else (unlike clinton who'd have to pay back donations in 'favours' presumably), so if you make a big deal of it and then pay yourself back with donations, it kind of is a LITTLE shady.
Almost everything in politics is a little shady, but the fact that Trump had the money up front made him beholden to nobody. if you are a nobody labour lawyer running for a top government position, you are going to owe a lot of political favours when you win.
It also applies to you. It is so obvious that the dems are accusing the Republicans for things they are actually doing and people have seen thru this. I can't believe you haven't seen thru this dither. That's amazing!
Pierre Poilievre is now leader of the Conservative Party of Canada after an impressive leadership campaign which he led from start to finish, attracting crowds of supporters larger than those for any current Canadian political leader — including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.This is starting to get just sad. The Left is in full Panic Overdrive over PP. They are trying everything they can to attach him to Trump and suggest some evil hidden agenda all in a bid to grab power. That's not just a bid, a SLEAZY bid.
They go so far as to suggest he is a clear and present danger to the country. And that his supporters are Canada's version of "the deplorables".
The fact that they are so scared spitless of him certainly suggests he's on the right track anyway.
Poilievre’s promises of a smaller, more efficient federal government, leaving people with more money in their pockets and more freedom to make their own choices about what is best for them and their families has clearly struck a chord with many Canadians.
With the Trudeau Liberals at the opposite end of the political spectrum — believers in the nanny state, along with their partners in the NDP — Canadians should have a clear choice in the next election in 2025, assuming the Liberal/NDP accord holds until then.
If it does, the Liberals will be ripe for defeat — in power for a decade by then, led by an unpopular PM heading an unpopular government, with an ever-expanding list of political baggage, scandals and broken promises.
EDITORIAL: Poilievre faces a weakened Trudeau — Toronto Sun
Pierre Poilievre is now leader of the Conservative Party of Canada after an impressive leadership campaign which he led from start to finish, attracting crowds of supporters larger than those for any current Canadian political leader — including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Poilievre’s...
Don’t forget, Trudeau lost the popular vote in the last two elections. Most voters believe, according to a recent Leger/Postmedia poll, that he has divided the nation because he “often favours certain groups and regions of the country over others, which has created national unity issues.”
The last election demonstrated Canadians don’t want a Conservative leader who is “Liberal lite”.
They want a Conservative leader with clear, understandable policies aimed at making their lives better and more affordable.
"Canadians don't want a gov't to run their lives! They want a gov't that can run a passport office!
-PP
And it's true. Smaller more efficient gov't that gets the job done and leaves tax money in the hands of the people is always popular during less than stellar times.
Actually, I have no issue calling out Dems for their stupid bs.
But unlike you, I don't have blind slobbering, cultist, fanatic, idol worship to a questionable slob of flesh who thinks he's still President.
Biden isn't that great a President, and never will be.
Dems, while at least trying to do work, haven't done much of what they promised, and they think relying on Republicans is going to work. Hint: it won't. Dems need balls to say fuck it and just DO instead of trying to work with people who do not give an absolute fig about anyone but their pocket books/bank accounts. (No, that's not to say Dems don't do that either, they do, but some of them at least try to give a shit about people).
You point out where Dems have done wrong, and if you have it from an UNBIASED source and it can be fact proven, I will absolutely agree with you.
So no, that comment DOESN'T apply to me.
It DOES apply to you, consistently.