If Israel were destroyed tomorrow the Hidden Hand would still exist and exert it's control over the species. I srael is one tiny basket of rotten eggs, they're are others not so easy to see, those you can only smell.
I'm confused by some suggesting this bombing was 'illegal'.I wonder if 'they' will impeach him for not getting congress to approve an attack. Even that would be unlikely considering no Americans were injured in the (false) attack.
Western Values! hahahahahahahahahahahah
You are stupid capitalist.
Really?? Perhaps if they had not been in the area over the last 70 years the place would be different today. Perhaps you should admit that all the deaths from both World Wars were by the World Bank's efforts to create a new Israel and that is over 100M deaths. Perhaps it is time to start locking up the bigger criminals rather than spending all the energy on solving false falag operations or making them into real attacks . Play stupid long enough and that is just what you become. That the Banksters have to spread a lot of lies to get their agenda passed means the ones being lied to have the power to put an end to it and it would cost a lot less lives than their endless wars and endless lies.I think the argument is that it's easier to just say "F*ck it" and drone a place as opposed to putting your own people in harm's way to bomb it. After all, military hardware is much easier to replace than trained/skilled operators of said hardware.
The US has been doing illegal wars since the end of WWII. That being said they are looking for any reason to dump trump. With this last move of his that might not make it a necessity as he just tanked most of the support he had so he either caves in or he resigns.I'm confused by some suggesting this bombing was 'illegal'.
By who's rules would this be considered any more illegal than the other bombings the Americans are doing in Syria and the other countries they are in?
Was it illegal for Obama to send drones around along with tens of thousands of bombs........?
They repeat what they are told, so does the media in the US. The only missing part is the truth about who is giving them the news that is to be published. Try the f*ckers who own the World Banks as being the head of the snake. all the rest is window dressing.Your source is British? Sorry, they aren't trustworthy.
69 is less than 50?Yup.
And that heinous chemical attack killed less people than the terrorist attack in Orlando.
We really give conflict way too much attention.
59 missiles fired, 23 made it to target, nuff said about their 'accuracy'. lol
The
Or Russians can't track Tomahawks if their lives counted on it.
But they managed to track half. Why not all of them? It's a big sign of weakness.
You say that like CNN or Israel Times are more truthful. Perhaps they get their intel from the Russian MOD and I'm quite sure they keep track of things like cruise missiles. If that is all the US has for weapons like that they shouldn't go too far from home. If Russia did have something to do with more than 50% not making it to target there is some more international sales for Russia.Lol...that number is from your sputnik friends.
That missile is decades old and new systems take a bite out of the pockets of the shareholders so you get the least effective system rather than the best that can be produced.they don't make the guidance systems much better than on those missiles. tech failures occur as does human error in programming the target. but gps, tercom and digital mapping is pretty much boss level.
So your iminination has more validity than a media outlet that does not have the same bad rep as the American Media. I hope you have a 'plan B' because that train of thought is as leaky as a sieve.anyway pal, with < 10 meter CEP, (and possibly < 3 meters), I would imagine 58 or 59 of them hit their intended targets.
The US has said they tracket the plane that did the gas attack. How much better can you get than that. Of course that was a statement that was not backed up by anything but silence and a few coughs from the back of the room.that said, accuracy depends on the mission requirements and how good the intelligence driving the targeting decisions is, and how well the targeting decision is made. it's not as if some ship's captain is 'sighting-in' a few rounds or something.
Mig-23's are almost as old as the bi-plane yet they has mission priority.most of the aircraft shelters were hit, tarmacs nearby, fuel storage tanks and handful of syrian mig-23's were targeted along with a rebel hospital. you can add 'em all up if ya like.
So Russia lit a bunch of fires to destroy (non-existant) gas before the Tomohawk's arrived? You mental gymnastics are entertaining to read but if you use them to guide you life you are in deep, deep trouble even if you are connected to a group that takes care of their own.as for the empty chemical drums, they're like pretty much empty. and the russians were given an hour heads-up before the attack so some frantic scurrying about may have taken place at 4am. also, sarin burns as far as I know so they have been left alone to be safe.
You forgot to include the distance between the bomb crater and the dead kids of do Syrian kids just line up along the highways??this syrian civilian attack was chlorine gas, hence the oxygen administered to the victims. that does nothing for nerve agents.
Half got popped when attacking a dump site. What makes you think there would be any that would get through on a 'well defended site'??But they managed to track half. Why not all of them? It's a big sign of weakness.