Land girls... lmao
Of course Canada and the US fed Britain with the convoys. Churchill even admitted it. If it was up to the Briddish Navy alone you certainly would have been blockaded. You tards were still planning for Jutland. lol
Hey guess what...Quebec wants to separate again
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
Land girls... lmao
Of course Canada and the US fed Britain with the convoys. Churchill even admitted it. If it was up to the Briddish Navy alone you certainly would have been blockaded. You tards were still planning for Jutland. lol
Don't forget all the Americans who crossed into Canada to sign up for the RCAF, the Canadian Army and Navy.
Thanks.
That still does not take away the FACT that many experts are now of the opinion that America was not needed in WWII. It seems that Churchill was WRONG to think he needed American intervention
Try doing a bit of research. You'll see that I'm right. That's if you dare, of course. Because the truth would hurt you, too.
There are many historians now who believe that Britain could have won WWII without America.
In fact, there are even those who are of the opinion that American intervention only lengthened the war.
Bollocks.
If Britain had lost the Battle of Britain then there could have been no Normandy landings.
No Normandy landings would probably have meant victory for Nazi Germany in the war.
Britain's victory in the Battle of Britain was important for humanity.
At least Germany didn't declare war on us, as it did with you.
Nazi Germany started that fight when it invaded Poland.
Who taught you history?
It was Nazi Germany who started WWIIl
I'm afraid mine isn't hurt. It can't be when I know that I live in the greatest civilisation to have ever bestrode planet Earth.
Not I'm not.
You lost the Vietnam War, didn't you? It was embarrassing for you.
You would have had no chance fighting Nazi Germany alone, as Britain did in 1940. We put up a better fight than you would have done.
Many Brits think so because the pain is unbearable that you needed to be saved.
Not at all. Many historians believe the exact opposite.
LMAO. Same historians?
Without the US and Canada there would have been no D-Day. We saved youuuuuu!
Britain's victory in the Battle of Britain was important for humanity.
Duh!
Time to hit the books BL!
BBC ON THIS DAY | 3 | 1939: Britain and France declare war on Germany
Actually to "give the Devil his due" Britain was by far the main participant in the Battle of Britain, which I guess saved their bacon for the time being but small potatoes in the entire war.
One would hope so. One would hope that the main participant in the Battle of Britain was actually Britain! I know... it is shocking. How many times do other nations have to save their sorry azzes!
Small potatoes for sure. The Germans turned their attention to the Soviets. That saved their bacon.
Even without US personnel in your war, did you have Boeing, Douglas, North American (in which your Merlin was magic) or the makers of the Sherman? It's much easier to have equipment when the established builders are a thousand miles across the sea. Dunkirk left you pretty much screwed....
That's incorrect. In March of 1942 Britain was officially broke. The last gold bar in the Brit pile at Fort Knox was transferred to the US pile (the Yanks had been making a killing out of the war, as usual). Lend-Lease started within days. Without US economic help Britain did not have the national ability to maintain the war. The RN outclassed the German navy by a factor of many times, but without wealthy allies Britain could not have fought past March of 1942. Alone she could not have fought that long; she needed Canadian resources, especially Canadian ports.
Yeah we sure made a killing :roll:. Your knowledge of history is either very poor or you intentionally distort the truth to convince others of just how "bad" us yanks really are.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease
Last edited:
Without supplies from the US and others Britain would have fallen to Germany in 41 or 42.
