medical science kills for coin

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,355
9,526
113
Washington DC
Imagine how over crowded we would be if governments and corporations didn't kill off a bunch of people every year. It just makes good environmental, as well as economic, sense.
Well, I'm generally pretty happy to see folks die for whatever reason, but I particularly like this one. It's way more efficient to kill people by denying them something, rather than spending money on all kinds of elaborate mechanisms and schemes to kill them.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Well, I'm generally pretty happy to see folks die for whatever reason, but I particularly like this one. It's way more efficient to kill people by denying them something, rather than spending money on all kinds of elaborate mechanisms and schemes to kill them.
True, but there is not much money in it.
 

55Mercury

rigid member
May 31, 2007
4,388
1,065
113
Imagine how over crowded we would be if governments and corporations didn't kill off a bunch of people every year. It just makes good environmental, as well as economic, sense.
lol

well I've always said to make the world a better place a hell of a lot of people gotta die!
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Perhaps I'm being somewhat naive, but I don't think that cannabis measures up to that of Percoset. Although I will agree that we need to find more effective less addictive pain management drugs, especially for chronic pain.

I don't think you are. In my youth I got high a few times and I at two different occasions I've had morphine injected into me at the Emergency Room. The pain was maddening each time and i wanted to die... they gave me that shot and all was well in the world. Not a bit of pain. No way can weed do that.

And I think those drugs should only be administered in cases of hospice and severe traumatic pain.

However... if weed makes a cancer patient feel good, etc. there is no darn reason they shouldn't be allowed to use it.

Please enlighten me with a list of the 'big perks' that 'doctors are getting from the pharma corps'.

They do TP. My buddy use to work for one of the big pharmaceutical corps. They wined and dined Docs all the time... ball games... the works.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,522
14,323
113
Low Earth Orbit
I don't think you are. In my youth I got high a few times and I at two different occasions I've had morphine injected into me at the Emergency Room. The pain was maddening each time and i wanted to die... they gave me that shot and all was well in the world. Not a bit of pain. No way can weed do that.
And if you were injected with weed directly into the bloodstream? The prophylaxis of an injection of 10mg morphine is 5 fold that of 10mg quick release pills. That is the difference of intravenous Vs. oral ingestion

Our bodies produce endocannabinoids as an anti-inflammatory, pain reliever and anxiety relief.

It's also the "high" in the "runners high" and is why some say they are addicted to it. Same goes for fears. That's not adrenaline risk takers are seeking when jumping out of a plane. it's the endocannabinoids.

Man and cannabis have had a symbiotic relationship for 10s of thousands of years.

No law can or ever will change that relationship.
 
Last edited:

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
University of BC Doctors Expose Vaccination Cover-up: Official Documents Released From The UK

May 21, 2013 by Arjun
University of BC Doctors Expose Vaccination Cover-up: Official Documents Released From The UK | Collective-Evolution
Dr Chris Shaw, from the University of British Colombia’s (UBC) Department of Ophthalmology, Visual Sciences, Experimental Medicine and Neuroscience published a paper in the Journal Inorganic Biochemistry along with his colleague, Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic that revealed Government experts have known about the dangers associated with vaccinations. They investigated information exposing a 30 year scandal of official meetings by UK government vaccine committees and independent medical ‘experts’ with drug industry connections. The paper is at the bottom of the article under “sources”.
A Freedom of Information Act request filed with the CDC seeking information on what the CDC knows about the dangers of vaccines, had by law to be responded to in 20 days. Nearly 7 years later a judge ordered the CDC to turn over the documents on September 30th, 2011. These documents were part of the study discussed in this article.
The paper has received a lot of attention. UBC even held a symposium about vaccination safety as a result in an effort to arouse more critical thinking and discussion around the topic. The response was disturbing with a number of UBC professors upset that the discussion was taking place in the first place. It’s disturbing to know that there are those out there who wish to silence an opposition to vaccination, and not even keep an open mind to potential dangers. Much of the medical literature examined by researchers comes straight from pharmaceutical company-sponsored medical research. It’s time for us to wake up and make some obvious connections. Here is a quote from the published, peer reviewed paper.
Deliberately concealing information from parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program(1).
The documents reveal that vaccinations don’t work, and that they cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They also indicate scientific fraud, that government ‘experts’ are working to conceal information. The 45 page paper was published in 2011 and presented at the BSEM scientific conference (2)
Here I present the documentation which appears to show that the JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence as will be explained. As a result of such vaccination policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH, many children have been vaccinated without their parents being disclosed the critical information about demonstrated risks of serious adverse reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to have been fully aware of. It would also appear that, by withholding this information, the JCVI/DH neglected the right of individuals to make an informed consent concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics. – Dr Lucija Tomljenovic (1)
She also mentions evidence of ties between vaccine manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies.
The transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake. Some of the meetings at which such controversial items were discussed were not intended to be publicly available, as the transcripts were only released later, through the Freedom of Information Act (FOI). These particular meetings are denoted in the transcripts as “commercial in confidence”, and reveal a clear and disturbing lack of transparency, as some of the information was removed from the text (i.e., the names of the participants) prior to transcript release under the FOI section at the JCVI website – Dr Lucija Tomljenovic (1)
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can "Sleep At Night": Gardasil and Cervarix Don't Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren't Tested

Tags:

Dr. Diane Harper was the lead researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix. She is the latest to come forward and question the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines. She made the surprising announcement at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through 4th, 2009. Her speech was supposed to promote the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines, but she instead turned on her corporate bosses in a very public way. When questioned about the presentation, audience members remarked that they came away feeling that the vaccines should not be used.

»
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can "Sleep At Night": Gardasil and Cervarix Don't Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren't Tested

Tags:

Dr. Diane Harper was the lead researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix. She is the latest to come forward and question the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines. She made the surprising announcement at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through 4th, 2009. Her speech was supposed to promote the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines, but she instead turned on her corporate bosses in a very public way. When questioned about the presentation, audience members remarked that they came away feeling that the vaccines should not be used.

»
Why are we not surprised??