Soldier is hacked to death by Muslim men just yards from barracks in London

gore0bsessed

Time Out
Oct 23, 2011
2,414
0
36
Right.

Two guys run down a perfectly innocent stranger, jump out of their car, and stab him to death with knives and cleaver, attempting to behead him, then stand around bragging of their deed to passer-by.

But it is Blackleaf that is the barbarian.

Right.

You really are ****ed in the head.

The killers and blackleaf, both barbarians.

Tell me how you think calling for the public execution is better than what the killers did lol.. that's definition of barbarism.
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
Levant
Multiculturalism doesn’t work

You can’t have two competing cultures in the same country

Our country was founded with several competing cultures. We're still here. Though we have had a few close calls.
 

gore0bsessed

Time Out
Oct 23, 2011
2,414
0
36
How would you feel if the authorities put them in general population in a max security UK prison.... I'd wager that they would get the justice that Blackleaf seeks

I don't think the men in max security give a **** about the government, that includes the military.. just my guess though.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
The killers and blackleaf, both barbarians.

Tell me how you think calling for the public execution is better than what the killers did lol.. that's definition of barbarism.

1. The killers actually committed a horrendous crime.

2. The killers have to be convicted by a jury of their peers.

3. The sentence would have to be one laid out in law.......

Now, I believe you are correct in that the UK no longer has capital punishment. Blackleaf may be wrong on that item. But if guilty, no one would deserve it more than these loonies.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
I don't think the men in max security give a **** about the government, that includes the military.. just my guess though.

Oddly enough, why just because they broke the law does not make them non humans and criminals have a code. Also these guys are screwed. They, when convicted will be released from jail when they are old and doddering.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
1. The killers actually committed a horrendous crime.

2. The killers have to be convicted by a jury of their peers.

3. The sentence would have to be one laid out in law.......

Now, I believe you are correct in that the UK no longer has capital punishment. Blackleaf may be wrong on that item. But if guilty, no one would deserve it more than these loonies.

This is a premium example of your flawed logic. Sentence #1 establishes killers and a horrendous crime before the law does. Sentence # two insists the jury find guilt when they are not obliged to. Sentence #2 pleads that the law must be followed, when it logically should be sentence #1 which would eliminate the need for the two additional sentences. Anyone who committed two or more murders would be more deserving of the legal remedy. You should work on your own loonacy.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Seriously, you getting your data from Mother Jones.. ROFLOL

Pull your head out of Obama's A$$


The information was gathered by the nonpartisan New America and was quoted by mother jones.

Seriously, you need to stop using your tongue to wipe Rush Limbagh's culo clean and to think for yourself. Before you criticize, how about trying to find some data that could at least refute part of those findings?
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
The information was gathered by the nonpartisan New America and was quoted by mother jones.

Seriously, you need to stop using your tongue to wipe Rush Limbagh's culo clean and to think for yourself. Before you criticize, how about trying to find some data that could at least refute part of those findings?
And that said with your nose firmly implanted in Obama's ..............
 

gore0bsessed

Time Out
Oct 23, 2011
2,414
0
36
1. The killers actually committed a horrendous crime.

Which should be treated accordingly, that doesn't include archaic public hangings not seen in England since the 19th century. That's just barbarism.

2. The killers have to be convicted by a jury of their peers.

3. The sentence would have to be one laid out in law.......

This doesn't make it less barbaric.

You want to respond to the brutal crime with brutality yourself and pretend those men are the only sick ones.

Oddly enough, why just because they broke the law does not make them non humans and criminals have a code. Also these guys are screwed. They, when convicted will be released from jail when they are old and doddering.
They have a code, but does that include giving a damn about government or military? I'd guess not.

This is a premium example of your flawed logic. Sentence #1 establishes killers and a horrendous crime before the law does. Sentence # two insists the jury find guilt when they are not obliged to. Sentence #2 pleads that the law must be followed, when it logically should be sentence #1 which would eliminate the need for the two additional sentences. Anyone who committed two or more murders would be more deserving of the legal remedy. You should work on your own loonacy.


To be fair, it's pretty well established murdering someone on the streets and beheading them is a crime. The jury would be deciding the punishment.