Actually taxslave, petros, et al, there is absolutely no use in trying to dissuade someone who is dead against guns, the entire concept is foreign to them - they live their own sheltered existance and will never understand in a million years!
do you really think sal is dead against guns? From the posts I read it is the 'wild west mentality' that
she has read over and over, and the millions of 'gun carrying people' on the street, or in their homes.
And, the mentality of wanting more and more guns.
It is too bad that when someone gives an anti gun opinion, many seem to automatically figure that they,
who are hunters etc. are included in that opinion. From what I have been reading that isn't correct.
From what I have read, Sal doesn't want your hunting rifle, or 22 taken away at all.
The two stories are completely different. I am totally against guns too, the same as Sal, but I am not
against sporting guns, hunting, target shooting, protecting one's animals on a farm and anything else
that fits into that catagory.
It is the heavily populated urban areas that are the most dangerous, no sporting type activities done
there, and even those who live in the urban areas who like to hunt have to take their hunting rifles,
or shotguns to the hunting areas, pretty useless in the city, (unless, they want to shoot a person).
Why does it seem to be so difficult to keep the 'two' catagories separated, the hunters etc, get their
knickers in a knot, when people are concerned about the millions of hand guns/assault rifles in the
u.s.
It is really sad that millions feel they need to carry or own a gun to protect themselves in heavily
populated areas, but that is life in the u.s. at this point in time, and it isn't going to change.
If someone can find a place on this earth to live, reasonably free of urban style guns, and find peace
and security, and not have to worry about who is around them who might be carrying guns, then all the
more power to that person, it 'is' the way it should be.