Surveillance cameras convict a "person" in the act of a crime.
Traffic cameras, convict the owner of the car.. not the "person" committing the crime.
As I said if it took the photo of the front plate plus the driver.. fine. But Alberta does not have a front plate, so the camera "assumes" the owner of the car is the driver and thus punishes the owner.. under an assumption of guilt.
Nap time is over and so are your dreams of beating this. LOL
Photos/video are the witness, the municipality the plaintiff, your tags in the photo identify you are the owner of the vehicle which your insurance policy says you are the one who signed the liability agreement (defendant) to take responsibility no matter who is driving. If somebody else committed the violation, driving your vehicle which you agreed to be liable for you get the ticket.
There are no loopholes.
If you look closely at your back plate, you'll see the RFID tag (in Sask it is behind the wheat stalks). When scanned by cops your driver's license pic pops up on the cop car computer as does your criminal record if you have one, any outstanding warrants and any driving restrictions you may have. They know everything about you, even what you look like before they get out of their car when they pull you over without having to radio dispatch.
The scanner in the cop cars can read multiple tags at once. Watch a cop sometime while sitting at a red light, he'll be looking at his on-board computer checking the details of everyone stopped at the light.
I've been pulled over in the US (Texas) for not having a front plate and had to explain all this to them. State troopers aren't exactly friendly to people from out of state let alone Canadian drivers.
Welcome to the digital age.
Speed Camera Number Plate Covers - There now even you can borrow my PT.
Useless when it comes to RFID