Next we need a propaganda pix of israeli colonists,saying they are for peace,with a gun in the hands. :lol:
Israeli court rejects US activist's family lawsuit
- Thread starter MapleDog
- Start date
NP:
Can anyone here interpret what these girls are doing and how they came to be doing it?
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060718_israeli_girls_lebanon_bound_rockets/
Anyone care to demonstrate their creative writing skills starting with the above image as a reference point?
Can anyone here interpret what these girls are doing and how they came to be doing it?
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060718_israeli_girls_lebanon_bound_rockets/
Anyone care to demonstrate their creative writing skills starting with the above image as a reference point?
You,re obviously guessing about how many sets of front teeth EAO can grow.
NP:
Can anyone here interpret what these girls are doing and how they came to be doing it?
Israeli Girls Write Messages on Lebanon-Bound Shells - Truthdig
Anyone care to demonstrate their creative writing skills starting with the above image as a reference point?
The education of cold little monsters.
Yeah teaching kids to continue the hatred for generations to come,i say the parents have forfeited their parental rights.NP:
Can anyone here interpret what these girls are doing and how they came to be doing it?
Israeli Girls Write Messages on Lebanon-Bound Shells - Truthdig
Anyone care to demonstrate their creative writing skills starting with the above image as a reference point?
That might be accurate, but Kaplan and ES could have done much better.
On the topic of demonizing propaganda... Here is an example of the reverse kind used against Israel.
The Muhammad al-Durrah incident took place in the Gaza Strip on September 30, 2000, on the second day of the Second Intifada, amid widespread rioting throughout the Palestinian territories. Jamal al-Durrah and his 12-year-old son, Muhammad, were filmed by Talal Abu Rahma, a Palestinian cameraman freelancing for France 2, as they sought cover behind a concrete cylinder after being caught in crossfire between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian security forces. The footage, which lasts just over a minute, shows the pair holding onto each other, the boy crying and the father waving, then a burst of gunfire and dust, after which the boy is seen slumped across his father's legs.[1]
Fifty-nine seconds of the footage were initially broadcast in France with a voiceover from Charles Enderlin, France 2's bureau chief in Israel, who did not witness the incident himself but got all information by phone from the cameraman, telling viewers that the al-Durrahs had been the "target of fire from the Israeli positions," and that the boy had died.[2] After an emotional public funeral, Muhammad was hailed throughout the Arab and Muslim worlds as a martyr.
Muhammad al-Durrah incident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am 99% certain that IDF soldiers shot at the father and son its possible/likely the boy died. Its unlikely that the video was staged. But the camera footage is just as out of context as ES's images of ISM newbies mugging for the cameras with firearms.
The context is during a riot. (Who brings their kid to a riot anyway... but maybe they were innocent bystanders who found themselves caught in a riot). During the riot, an Israeli military observation/sniper tower came under attack with gun fire and homemade petrol bombs. The soldiers inside were fighting for their lives and firing at anything that moved. I doubt they knew they were shooting at a boy and his father. I watched other videos from the same event, and it appeared that the IDF were ducked down behind a protective barrier and firing in the general direction of a large angry mob and were not aiming their fire at the father and son specifically. Common sense tells me the middle of a fire fight with an angry armed mob is an unlikely time for the IDF to choose to shoot an unarmed man and his son. But if you saw the video, it only shows the father and son, not context. That video has been used by anti-Israeli propagandists to fuel hatred against Jews and Israelis, when in my opinion, the IDF actions were reasonable and expected... based on my research of this event. Anyone who attempts to draw conclusions of the video with out reference the context of a riot and the desperate situation of the IDF soldiers on the tower is spinning BS, just like Kaplan and ES does regarding the ISM newbies posing with firearms.
On the topic of demonizing propaganda... Here is an example of the reverse kind used against Israel.
The Muhammad al-Durrah incident took place in the Gaza Strip on September 30, 2000, on the second day of the Second Intifada, amid widespread rioting throughout the Palestinian territories. Jamal al-Durrah and his 12-year-old son, Muhammad, were filmed by Talal Abu Rahma, a Palestinian cameraman freelancing for France 2, as they sought cover behind a concrete cylinder after being caught in crossfire between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian security forces. The footage, which lasts just over a minute, shows the pair holding onto each other, the boy crying and the father waving, then a burst of gunfire and dust, after which the boy is seen slumped across his father's legs.[1]
Fifty-nine seconds of the footage were initially broadcast in France with a voiceover from Charles Enderlin, France 2's bureau chief in Israel, who did not witness the incident himself but got all information by phone from the cameraman, telling viewers that the al-Durrahs had been the "target of fire from the Israeli positions," and that the boy had died.[2] After an emotional public funeral, Muhammad was hailed throughout the Arab and Muslim worlds as a martyr.
Muhammad al-Durrah incident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am 99% certain that IDF soldiers shot at the father and son its possible/likely the boy died. Its unlikely that the video was staged. But the camera footage is just as out of context as ES's images of ISM newbies mugging for the cameras with firearms.
The context is during a riot. (Who brings their kid to a riot anyway... but maybe they were innocent bystanders who found themselves caught in a riot). During the riot, an Israeli military observation/sniper tower came under attack with gun fire and homemade petrol bombs. The soldiers inside were fighting for their lives and firing at anything that moved. I doubt they knew they were shooting at a boy and his father. I watched other videos from the same event, and it appeared that the IDF were ducked down behind a protective barrier and firing in the general direction of a large angry mob and were not aiming their fire at the father and son specifically. Common sense tells me the middle of a fire fight with an angry armed mob is an unlikely time for the IDF to choose to shoot an unarmed man and his son. But if you saw the video, it only shows the father and son, not context. That video has been used by anti-Israeli propagandists to fuel hatred against Jews and Israelis, when in my opinion, the IDF actions were reasonable and expected... based on my research of this event. Anyone who attempts to draw conclusions of the video with out reference the context of a riot and the desperate situation of the IDF soldiers on the tower is spinning BS, just like Kaplan and ES does regarding the ISM newbies posing with firearms.
That is an outright lie.
And you should know it, since you and Goob's were close buddies when he started here. And he most definitely took your side on more than one issue.
Forum rule, #1...
1. Not to post any material that you know, or in our judgment ought to know, is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, threatening, invasive of personal privacy, or in violation of Canadian law;
Why are you such a lying troll EAO?
Oh the irony and hypocrisy of the resident Jew hating troll, lol.
This should be a disclaimer you are forced to put on each and every post you make.
Ramallah, 16th September 2006:
Recently, photos were posted on the internet showing five foreigners posing with members of the Palestinian security services in Jericho while holding police weapons, along with the claim that four of the foreigners were volunteers with the International Solidarity Movement (ISM). The article accompanying the photos also claims that the fifth, unnamed foreigner with the obscured face in the photos went undercover in order to try and sabotage those, such as the ISM, who support Palestinian non-violent resistance.
At the time the photographs were taken, these individuals had not yet become ISM volunteers. They went to Jericho of their own volition without coordinating or discussing their plans with the International Solidarity Movement. They had not attended ISM’s mandatory intensive non-violence training and were new to the country. The fifth foreigner encouraged them to join him in the photographs and have their pictures taken holding guns. These individuals regrettably followed his advice.
We have discovered the real name of the fifth foreigner to be XXXX XXXXXX from Britain, though he gave his surname as Andrews at the time. The article is filled with the now standard fabrications and distortions – too many to list in full. Possibly the most outrageous claim is that two of the foreigners in the photos are now in Israeli custody, which is totally untrue. This article is part of a long standing campaign to slander ISM and destroy non-violent Palestinian resistance by spreading false information. See previous statements on the ISM site.
None of the individuals photographed ever took part in any violent activity. As non-violence is one of the three basic principles of ISM, they would have been required to leave if they had done so. At ISM’s training in Palestine, as a condition for joining ISM in Palestine, all activists are required to commit to supporting only non-violent resistance. These volunteers did so. At the training, all activists are also instructed never to touch any weapon, or even anything that resembles a weapon.
Dave, a volunteer from Ireland featured in the photos, said: “XXXX wanted his photo taken with the guys in the prison, then one of them gave him a gun to hold and they also offered them to us to hold for photos. We were a bit reluctant to take them because of the simple fact that they were guns – not because pictures of future ISMers holding guns could cause trouble. After some encouragement from XXXX and the Palestinians we took them and thought no more about it”.
Upon learning of this incident, ISM activists informed these individuals that touching weapons violates ISM’s policies and that they would not be permitted to volunteer unless they agreed never to handle weapons. All except XXXXXX apologized and deleted their photographs. XXXXXX did not attend ISM training and subsequently disappeared. Following their training, the others worked diligently and without incident with the ISM and Palestinian communities in support of non-violent direct action. According to Dave: “we are deeply sorry for the trouble this has caused. We are of course completely committed to non-violence and realize that we made a terrible mistake”.
ISM remains committed to supporting and engaging with Palestinian communities in non-violent resistance. ISM intends to re-examine its information resources and training in order to make clear to everyone intending to volunteer in the future that handling weapons in any situation is unacceptable.
For more information about the ISM, visit International Solidarity Movement - Nonviolence. Justice. Peace.
ISM Responds to Internet Photos, Reaffirms Commitment to Non-violence
Recently, photos were posted on the internet showing five foreigners posing with members of the Palestinian security services in Jericho while holding police weapons, along with the claim that four of the foreigners were volunteers with the International Solidarity Movement (ISM). The article accompanying the photos also claims that the fifth, unnamed foreigner with the obscured face in the photos went undercover in order to try and sabotage those, such as the ISM, who support Palestinian non-violent resistance.
At the time the photographs were taken, these individuals had not yet become ISM volunteers. They went to Jericho of their own volition without coordinating or discussing their plans with the International Solidarity Movement. They had not attended ISM’s mandatory intensive non-violence training and were new to the country. The fifth foreigner encouraged them to join him in the photographs and have their pictures taken holding guns. These individuals regrettably followed his advice.
We have discovered the real name of the fifth foreigner to be XXXX XXXXXX from Britain, though he gave his surname as Andrews at the time. The article is filled with the now standard fabrications and distortions – too many to list in full. Possibly the most outrageous claim is that two of the foreigners in the photos are now in Israeli custody, which is totally untrue. This article is part of a long standing campaign to slander ISM and destroy non-violent Palestinian resistance by spreading false information. See previous statements on the ISM site.
None of the individuals photographed ever took part in any violent activity. As non-violence is one of the three basic principles of ISM, they would have been required to leave if they had done so. At ISM’s training in Palestine, as a condition for joining ISM in Palestine, all activists are required to commit to supporting only non-violent resistance. These volunteers did so. At the training, all activists are also instructed never to touch any weapon, or even anything that resembles a weapon.
Dave, a volunteer from Ireland featured in the photos, said: “XXXX wanted his photo taken with the guys in the prison, then one of them gave him a gun to hold and they also offered them to us to hold for photos. We were a bit reluctant to take them because of the simple fact that they were guns – not because pictures of future ISMers holding guns could cause trouble. After some encouragement from XXXX and the Palestinians we took them and thought no more about it”.
Upon learning of this incident, ISM activists informed these individuals that touching weapons violates ISM’s policies and that they would not be permitted to volunteer unless they agreed never to handle weapons. All except XXXXXX apologized and deleted their photographs. XXXXXX did not attend ISM training and subsequently disappeared. Following their training, the others worked diligently and without incident with the ISM and Palestinian communities in support of non-violent direct action. According to Dave: “we are deeply sorry for the trouble this has caused. We are of course completely committed to non-violence and realize that we made a terrible mistake”.
ISM remains committed to supporting and engaging with Palestinian communities in non-violent resistance. ISM intends to re-examine its information resources and training in order to make clear to everyone intending to volunteer in the future that handling weapons in any situation is unacceptable.
For more information about the ISM, visit International Solidarity Movement - Nonviolence. Justice. Peace.
ISM Responds to Internet Photos, Reaffirms Commitment to Non-violence
Sorry P, but I don't know what the images represent. Looks like a beaver tail and two gnawed logs to me.
Two pens and a turkey drum stick?
Two pens and a turkey drum stick?
Again it kinda look that some have chosen the side of the jewish israelis,and again its seems that 6 millions dead at the hands of the nazis is a good reason to act like douchebags.
Hamas Hezbolah or jewish settlers,all sides are wrong cause they put others in the middle of their pissing contest.
Hamas Hezbolah or jewish settlers,all sides are wrong cause they put others in the middle of their pissing contest.
I think so,there is an infiltrated douchebag in the group,and everyone has the right to know who the frak he is.We all know what this image represents don't we?
Yes the group was infiltrated and exposed for what they really are. It is called investigative reporting.
They have a right to know who he is? Why MD? Would you like him hurt? Harrassed? Maybe given a good beating?
So I take it you hate the Joooos as well MD?