don't hold back RCS, tell us what you really think.
Yes, I'd like to know your opinion. All these countries but one, voted to condemn Israel's ethnic cleansing. The one country that voted against the resolution, agreed Israel's actions were illegal. How is that possible?Are you asking me?
...If that were really true Obama would have authorized the American UN ambassador to vote in favor of the resolution. Saying one thing and doing another thing is called duplicity.
Good question.How can someone veto the illegality of something and then turn around and agree with it?????
Yes, I'd like to know your opinion. All these countries but one, voted to condemn Israel's ethnic cleansing. The one country that voted against the resolution, agreed Israel's actions were illegal. How is that possible?
If all these nations (the overwhelming majority) supported this resolution condemning Israel and Israel has done nothing wrong, then this resolution must be some part of global Israel hating conspiracy, involving the UK, France, Germany, Brazil... right?
What war crimes.The US is the only nation on the UN security council which openly supports Israeli war crimes.
The vote wasn't about Chavez. Stay on topic.
For a long time, any western politician who doesn't support Israel as unshakably as Prime Minister Stephen Harper tend to have short careers. The evidence is overwhelming that our media and politicians closely follows the Israeli narrative. This vote by the US at the UNSC in front of the entire world makes the US and Israel transparent to everyone, except those who can't see oppression and injustice in plain sight.
This isn't about Judaism. Its about doing the right thing. Everyone who is aware and not part of the solution, is part of the problem.
The vote wasn't about Chavez. Stay on topic.
Interesting choice of words...Well, according to the article you quoted, the United States said they vetoed it because it would derail peace talks. I'm not inclined to believe them. I think it's just Obama, as usual, failing to commit to anything.
Veto - UN's Achilles heel....
Do you support Israel's ongoing Jewish only colony building over razed Palestinian homes, cemeteries, parks, farmland...
If it helps keep the terrorists at bay then I don't have a problem with it.
But who are the terrorists? Who is occupying whose land? That ought to answer the question.
You got some fine upstanding pro human rights countries there.
How relevant is that? If Hitler himself had voted against ethnic cleansing or foreign occupation of lands, and outstanding democratic countries opposed it, while we could argue Hitler would be a hypocrite, we'd still have to say he was right, whereas the democratic countries would also be hypocritical for opposing human rights abroad, plus they'd still be wrong.
Israel is fine and dandy with ethnic cleansing as long as it's not them being cleansed.
Why else would they build a Red Army Memorial in Jerusalem?
Guys like Lev Davidovich Bronstein (Leon Trotsky) who founded and lead the Red Army in the Holodomor, slaughter, toture, rape and starvation of 66 Million are worth honouring?
Ohhhhhhh It all Stalins fault is it? It's funny how you pick the only Non-Jew out of 6 butchers to blame. Every person who suffered right up until 1991 were victims. Start tallying bub!Although Mr. Bronstein was no angel, and was willing to use terror to achieve his goals.....(a true believer, there is nothing more dangerous)........he is not guilty of the mass slaughters, the manufactured famines, the purges that cost millions of lives in Soviet Russia.....although 66 million is WAY over the top
The real number is a fraction of that....about a third, by most estimates.
No matter, millions are millions are millions....it is WAY too many. And this is tens of millions......
But lay the blame where it belongs.....at the feet of Joseph Stalin.
And Joseph Stalin was NOT Jewish.....which is what you are getting at, I know.