I think LSD in the Pentagon drinking water might be effective. Same for whoever is running the Israeli military. Iran probably has some mighty fine hash. A little in their coffee would do wonders for their attitude.
An article that puts things into some perspective. Read it and let me know if he is also drugged up and out?I think LSD in the Pentagon drinking water might be effective. Same for whoever is running the Israeli military. Iran probably has some mighty fine hash. A little in their coffee would do wonders for their attitude.
An article that puts things into some perspective. Read it and let me know if he is also drugged up and out?
Jonathan Kay: Imagining an Iranian ICBM | Full Comment | National Post
Love the illustration at the beginning of the article. Really puts it into perspective, lol
If Rubin is right.....An article that puts things into some perspective. Read it and let me know if he is also drugged up and out?
Jonathan Kay: Imagining an Iranian ICBM | Full Comment | National Post
If Rubin is right.....
Yup! Just another bunch of speculative fear mongering BS. I'm sure Rubin is not on drugs, but he is on a mission to drum up support for Israel war mongering. I now see clearly where you get your paranoia about Iran. Sorry Goobs, but I don't buy into that sort of hate propaganda and I am deeply disturbed by people who do.
I fail to see how someone can support a nation that already has nukes and has a 100 year track record of using violence and war as a tool of subjugating other nations while condemning another nation that does not have nukes and has not invaded other nations in that same time period. Can you not see the dichotomy of that position? Whether or not the Iranian government is a bunch of religious fanatics or not is irrelevant. They have a right to protect themselves against the obvious threat of attack by the US and Israel. Having nukes and the means to deliver them would make an attack much less likely. Until the US stops their aggressive behaviour and interference in the internal affairs of the Middle East, Iran has the right to do whatever it sees necessary to protect its people.No not paranoia - Thinking more along the lines of Theological Nutjobs with an unstable Govt - Imanutjob and the battling Ayatollah and which military /terror orgs and who controls the most during this power struggle that they are going thru-Or Thugocracy and Nukes- Now that is not paranoia.
I fail to see how someone can support a nation that already has nukes and has a 100 year track record of using violence and war as a tool of subjugating other nations while condemning another nation that does not have nukes and has not invaded other nations in that same time period. Can you not see the dichotomy of that position? Whether or not the Iranian government is a bunch of religious fanatics or not is irrelevant. They have a right to protect themselves against the obvious threat of attack by the US and Israel. Having nukes and the means to deliver them would make an attack much less likely. Until the US stops their aggressive behaviour and interference in the internal affairs of the Middle East, Iran has the right to do whatever it sees necessary to protect its people.
YouTube - US interventionist Policy
You are right... not to expect that. Did you watch the video? It only covered a fraction of the aggressive behaviour. What good the US has done has been far outweighed by the bad. And creating a democratic state out of Iraq and Afghanistan is one sick joke. Neither of these countries is a democracy nor free and probably never will as long as the US is there propping up their puppet governments to steal Iraqi oil and and the poppies in Afghanistan. You also forgot the Philippines where they slaughtered 3 million Muslims and then supported Marcos and his reign of terror. Ever notice that all the bogymen of the past few decades were all despots that the Yanks created or supported? Noriega, Hussein, Bin Laden to name but a few.Are you living on the same planet as me???
The Yanks stayed out of WW One until 1917.
They stayed out of WW II until attacked in 1941..........
They single handedly rebuilt Europe and Japan into liberal, free states.......after WWII.....when they were the ONLY nuclear power, and could have ruled the world through terror, they passed.
They defended the west against Soviet expansionism.......it is because of the USA western Europe did not fall into the Soviet black hole...
They stopped (with UN help) aggression from North Korea, Russia, China on the Korean Peninsula....if you want to see what they SAVED you from, look at NK and China.....
They helped create the ONLY free democratic state in the ME, and are working on the second.....
They have made tremendous mistakes, such as Vietnam and their support of looney dictators in South America....but without them, we'd have been in DEEP trouble.
A little respect is in order.
Not that I expect THAT!!!!!
Love the illustration at the beginning of the article. Really puts it into perspective, lol
No not paranoia - Thinking more along the lines of Theological Nutjobs with an unstable Govt - Imanutjob and the battling Ayatollah and which military /terror orgs and who controls the most during this power struggle that they are going thru-Or Thugocracy and Nukes- Now that is not paranoia.
I fail to see how someone can support a nation that already has nukes and has a 100 year track record of using violence and war as a tool of subjugating other nations while condemning another nation that does not have nukes and has not invaded other nations in that same time period. Can you not see the dichotomy of that position? Whether or not the Iranian government is a bunch of religious fanatics or not is irrelevant. They have a right to protect themselves against the obvious threat of attack by the US and Israel. Having nukes and the means to deliver them would make an attack much less likely. Until the US stops their aggressive behaviour and interference in the internal affairs of the Middle East, Iran has the right to do whatever it sees necessary to protect its people.
YouTube - US interventionist Policy
I post links that offer a clear view point - Going by a title of a link posted demonstrates that you have no wish to read other opinion's -
Here is an opposing viewpoint.
Jonathan Kay: The case against bombing Iran | Full Comment | National Post
Okay, Cliffy, I hadn't watched the vid, as I assumed it was BS. Man, was I EVER correct!!!!!!!
Errors of FACT in the vid:
The United States did NOT back or train Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan against the Russians. Nor was he trained by the CIA. The USA did back the Mujahade'en in the Afghanistan war.......but bin Laden was a co-leader of a group so radical they refused all western aid as stained by infidels, and got their support from Saudi Arabia.
The United States did NOT supply billions in weapons to Saddam Hussein's regime at any time.......
Iraq did not invade Kuwait with US weapons.....as illustrated above. That is the most ridiculous claim, displyed under advancing Iraqis in a Soviet personnel carrier....
500,000 Iraqi children did not die from sanctions and bombing.....such claims are seriously moronic. And those that did die are not the responsibility of the USA, considering the fact Saddam was allowed to use oil revenues for food and medecine....but chose to build palaces. This is the most wide-spread, and one of the most.....disingenuous of the anti-American lies so quickly accepted by the unthinking......
Iran isn't paranoid. All they have to do is look at Iraq next door to see what the US does to countries it doesn't like that don't possess WMDs. I doubt the US would have invaded and occupied Iraq, if Iraq had the ability to bomb American cities. Iraq's inability to inflict real pain on the US in response to an unprovoked attack is why hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died and millions more became refugees. Iraq's inability to present a credible deterrent was an invitation for invasion, which also resulted in thousands of US and allied military deaths and injuries.
I expect that Iran will acquire ICBM technology as quickly as possible out a sense of self preservation against the existential threat from the US and Israel. Iranians have just as much right to acquire this technology as the US, Russia, China... or anyone else. The day Iran can bomb the US as easily as the US can bomb Iran, will be the day the Iranian people become a lot safer. Until then they are just as vulnerable to a US led invasion/occupation as Iraq was.
I also blame the American people and all the idiots who went along with the US led war crime against the Iraqi people for the current situation. If the US respected international laws, hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis would still be alive and Iran would not be aggressively pursing a military deterrent. If the US and Israel demonstrated a willingness to respect international laws, its even possible that the Iranians could have been convinced not to pursue WMDs.
Instead, the Iranians probably noticed how easily the American people can be misled and manipulated into supporting war crimes. Likely, they also noticed that American leaders can commit war crimes with impunity and very few Americans will demand accountability.
If Americans and Israelis wanted to convince Iranians that they are not a threat, they should arrest their war criminals starting with George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. Until then, the Iranian people would be wise to devise ways to protect themselves from an unprovoked attack by the US and Israel, and the means to inflict real pain on the US and Israel in response to an unprovoked attack.
MAD is the only way the world can be safe from the lunatic war criminals in the US and Israel who are responsible for so much death and destruction.
If anyone thinks Iran is a threat to world peace, then please give examples of Iran starting unprovoked wars, committing war crimes or crimes against humanity on the scale of of the war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the US and Israel. Actions speak louder athan words. When you start doing body counts it becomes very clear which countries are led by lunatic war criminals.