Hey look at reality and be sure you are wearing sunglasses when you do, because it may blind you. Abortion legal in Canada is not a Conservative achievement, but rather the Liberals have made it legal. If the Conservatives had their way they would make it illegal, and you can take that to the bank.
Quite so. Abortion is legal in Canada, not because of Conservatives, but in spite of them.
Actually, reality escapes you two. Abortion became
completely legal in Canada in 1988. Turdeau's efforts only made it partially legal (the medical reason for abortion). In 1988, Bullroney was the PM. He was a Conservative.
But it isn't the politicians that ruled abortion legal anyway. It was the Supreme Court of Canada that did that.
And yet again, you people haven't a clue wtf you are babbling about.
Now we are in some form of human understanding, and my logic is, if Harper would go to a war in Afghanistan and put out 148 lives and $50.000.000 with 0 return being that Afghanistan is soooooooo corrupt, and or champion the next G8 get-together in Ontario to help Pregnant women and children of Africa, then surely a reasonable contribution that won't brake the bank here at home, will make Canada SHINE FOR A LONG TIME ABROAD. But as you said IF Harper agrees, in which case he doesn’t, thus the G7 have labelled him a hypocrite because he is.
Again reality escapes you. It was your Gliberals that sent Canucks to Afghanistan.
But don't let the facts get in the way of your inane POVs.
_________________________________________________________________________
L Gilbert attempted to refute my contention that if men's prostate examination is not funded by Canadian health care neither should be abortion, by saying:
"All men have prostates. Not all women who get pregnant want abortions."
True, but all women have breasts and Mammogramms are fully funded. Not to mention the fact that while - indeed - women can not have prostate cancer, men, rarely have been known to have breast cancer.
So, perhaps my comparison of covering costs between PSA test and abortion was not right on, I need to be convinced that if mammograms are fully covered PSA test should not be.
You missed the point by miles.
Actually, what the discussion went like was this: you said,
What could have been said - and wasn't - that far more people die from prostate related problems than from abortion or lack therof.
Mind you, those who die from prostate problems are only males, so who gives a damn?
Yet a male Canadian has to pay out of his own pocket for a PSA teat, while the promiscous female (at least, in most cases) who had no sense to prevent pregnancy gets a free pass.
What's wrong with that picture? SiRJosephPorter, could you please impart your wisdom?
So you leap to the a$$umption that women who get abortions are promiscuous and haven't sense to prevent pregnancies. Sorry, Yukon Jack but not all women are like that.
Anyway, Les replied with pretty good logic that
All men have prostates. Not all women who get pregnant want abortions.
Yep, leave ity up to the "promiscuous female". There are contraceptives for males, too, you know. Besides that, there are also promiscuous males.
