I think that life emerged from the primordial soup on Earth and that life spread over the whole planet. and it evolved into every creature we ever had or have. It doesn't have to be more complicated than that.
Murchison meteorite
I think that life emerged from the primordial soup on Earth and that life spread over the whole planet. and it evolved into every creature we ever had or have. It doesn't have to be more complicated than that.
It does no such thing. All it proves is that all life on this planet likely originated from the same source, which was most likely a bunch of animo acids and proteins on meteorites.This proves the Creator is the same Designer of all the universe.
.... or not.I don't mean some of us are aliens, but originally the seed of life came from one past planet to another future planet by means of the meteoritic rocks.
lmao Good point. Thanks.Please note that my forum name abbreviates as BS.
No way. I bet they are octopods with antennae that carry 4961 different types of sensory organs, no brains, have titanium shells, jello muscles, and bones of transparent steel.I think the ET are similar to the people of Earth with some differences: like the general color may be blue or green (not very deep color may be), in addition to some other variations of the ear or nose or eye. In addition, some of the ET may be winged: having two wings like that of the eagle.
Superman.If so how did they reach to our Earth?
No reason. But he was only suggesting that there was another possibility to the one you claimed.And why not on a previous planet, because life needs suitable conditions and circumstances; specially if it is a life with various forms of plant, animal and man;
He didn't. He just suggested another possibility.so why do you deny the possibility that it started on some planets then came to our Earth embedded in the broken pieces of such destroyed planets?
That is only your limited interpretation. I say "limited" because there are other possibilities.The design is the same indicats --> the Creator is the same One.
The variations of a large number of kinds (of the plant, animal and man races)indicate --> His might and omnipotence.
Yup. Parents usually create their kids. It happens a lot.There is no doubt we were created. Doubt rests in the process. Evolution creates and creation evolves.
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that every living thing, animal, insect, fish or tree share the same DNA. If one of us is alien, all of us are alien.
This proves the Creator is the same Designer of all the universe.
Well, at least we won't have to worry about racism anymore lol Although I wonder what the evangelicals and Christian nuts' thoughts on this.
I think that life emerged from the primordial soup on Earth and that life spread over the whole planet. and it evolved into every creature we ever had or have. It doesn't have to be more complicated than that.
Yup. Parents usually create their kids. It happens a lot.
It most certainly did. The point is, how did it originate in the primordial soup? that could very well have come from contamination from outer space.
If life came from outer space, where did it start from? If life could start on another planet, it could just as easily have started on Earth.
You are quite right. 'Other world hypothesis' simply pushes the origin of life further back, it doesn't really tell us how life originated.
Saying that life originated on another world is astronomical solution to the problem, it is not the biological solution.
What would either a "biological or astronomical solution" constitute for the species? What would it mean to solve for these two unknowns? What does it mean to even think it possible?
Neither. Life always existed.There is no doubt in the process but there is doubt that the entire creation is exclusive to the parents. I''l try again. Evolution results in creations and those creations evolve more creations. Which came first the creations or the evolutions?
Well, they don't originate in nut trees, rocks, or flashlights.And are children entirely the product of the parents?
Enough.How much of the environmental factors at the time and the spacial position influence the creation of the offspring?
Wrong. It is irrelevant where the parts came from. If the conditions HERE were right to form life then that life HERE is indigenous. Only in an extremely remote sense is life alien: and that is only because Earth itself came from somewhere else. Earth came from a sun. Suns come from nebulae. etc. etc. Life born here is native.Absolutely, if the theory of contamination is correct (that life arose out of contamination, whether from a meteor, asteroid, or the remains of the picnic by an alien species) then all the life on earth is alien life.
You are quite right. 'Other world hypothesis' simply pushes the origin of life further back, it doesn't really tell us how life originated.
Saying that life originated on another world is astronomical solution to the problem, it is not the biological solution.
I thought that sounded familiar. The idea was in Science mag, SciAm, or New Scientist last year I think. If it is true, it is the link between the pre-assembled parts of life and life.Here is a relatively new solution to the problem that shows some promise:
Origin of Life On Earth: Scientists Unlock Mystery Of Molecular Machine