Right.In other words, your scenario is not realistic. No country will get 100% of it's power from one source. That's not smart.
Solar thermal will be a big deal in the coming decades. It's a bit player now, but there area huge deals being struck over in Europe with African nations (almost $600 Billion), and plans for stations in the SW and SE USA. You can get power from solar thermal when the sun isn't shining. By storing the superheated liquid in storage tanks.
I see nothing wrong with a mix of forms of societal philosophies. I think only idiots rely solely on one form simply because we are humans. Whatever we develop has faults. The best we can do is take what is good from all forms and chuck the rest in the dustbin. Obviously, what is strictly socialistic doesn't work any better than strictly capitalistic. They are both deeply flawed in that neither takes into consideration human character flaws.
I see nothing wrong with a mix of forms of societal philosophies. I think only idiots rely solely on one form simply because we are humans. Whatever we develop has faults. The best we can do is take what is good from all forms and chuck the rest in the dustbin. Obviously, what is strictly socialistic doesn't work any better than strictly capitalistic. They are both deeply flawed in that neither takes into consideration human character flaws.
In other words, your scenario is not realistic. No country will get 100% of it's power from one source. That's not smart.
Solar thermal will be a big deal in the coming decades. It's a bit player now, but there area huge deals being struck over in Europe with African nations (almost $600 Billion), and plans for stations in the SW and SE USA. You can get power from solar thermal when the sun isn't shining. By storing the superheated liquid in storage tanks.
''Liberalism is What is Killing California''
For that you can thank REPUBLICAN Arnie Schwarzeneggar.
Solar, tidal, thermal, wind etc. just can produce so much power. Nuclear is the only source that can produce and replace coal in the foreseeable future.
The biggest waste of energy is transmission over long distances. the DC and AC battles of the past were won only because AC has the ability to be trnsmitted over long distances without excessive resistance. The best way to solve this is bring the power sources closer to where it is needed. The cost of electricty would plummet if there were no grid to maintain.Not true. Solar thermal can provide baseload. It can provide power when the sun doesn't shine by storing the steam in large vaults (cheaper than batteries). Also, you're assuming that we achieve nothing in terms of improvements in energy efficiency. If we use energy more efficiently, then we don't need as much baseload. Integrated grids with many types of renewable can meet the demand. They tested this in Germany, who is miles ahead of nearly everyone in renewable development. They have a smart grid plan, which will reduce power consumption drastically.
[/font]
*shrugs* ... and Republican Arnie is failing miserably at fixing Cali.Read your history of California a little better. It all started with this. Poor Arnie is stuck with what this did.
Proposition 1: Property Taxes: Contaminated Property. - California State Government
That's because he's not a conservative. He's a RINO.*shrugs* ... and Republican Arnie is failing miserably at fixing Cali.
Egg Zachary.Not true. Solar thermal can provide baseload. It can provide power when the sun doesn't shine by storing the steam in large vaults (cheaper than batteries). Also, you're assuming that we achieve nothing in terms of improvements in energy efficiency. If we use energy more efficiently, then we don't need as much baseload. Integrated grids with many types of renewable can meet the demand. They tested this in Germany, who is miles ahead of nearly everyone in renewable development. They have a smart grid plan, which will reduce power consumption drastically.
[/font]