What Emergency Act?

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
31,022
11,292
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The so-called (?) “freedom convoy” that blocked Parliament Hill and several Canada-U.S. border crossings may have dispersed earlier this year, but it won’t be leaving our political conversation anytime soon. At least, not if opponents of the federal Conservative Party and their new leader, Pierre Poilievre, have anything to say about it.


The party most interested in reminding Canadians about ties between the convoy and Pierre Poilievre will be the Liberal Party. Why? The Liberals are in a very difficult spot. They currently trail the Conservatives in the national popular vote by five points. The Conservatives also lead the Liberals in all regions of the country west of Quebec, with a stunning seven-point lead in seat-rich Ontario. With these numbers, if an election were held tomorrow, the Conservatives would easily win a plurality of seats.

The Public Order Emergency Commission was to begin hearings Sept. 19 but will be delayed now until Oct. 13….so…the greasy weasel and his fanboys will need to deflect until the NDP/Liberals in their Non-Coalition Coalition’s Coalition can shut down that public inquiry
Dane Lloyd, the Conservative party critic for emergency preparedness, said Canadians deserve complete transparency from the government to explain why the Emergencies Act was necessary.

"Canadians need more than just the information cabinet had but how they used that information, and how the decision to invoke the Emergencies Act was made," Lloyd said in a statement.

“So far transparency has not been forthcoming. The minister of public safety has lied to and misled Canadians in an attempt to deflect responsibility for invoking the Emergencies Act. We do not have confidence that the Liberals will behave any differently when it comes to the public inquiry."

The Conservatives had been pushing for the Liberals to grant the inquiry access to cabinet documents.

The commission has not yet indicated whether Trudeau or cabinet ministers will be asked to testify at the public hearings that are expected to begin in September (& now Mid-October).

Trudeau's government triggered the Emergencies Act on Feb. 14, and Trudeau revoked the emergency declaration Feb. 23, two days after the NDP joined the Liberals in a House of Commons motion affirming his government's choice to use the exceptional powers, but just hours before the Senate could step in on this decision.

Rouleau granted standing to the convoy leaders, along with a not-for-profit corporation called Freedom 2022 Human Rights and Freedoms, because of their "key role in the events that led to the declaration of the emergency." He also dismissed the federal Conservatives’ application for standing.
1664721151559.jpeg
So the above is to be used, by the Liberal/NDP’s, to jointly attack the official opposition (?) because…..they’re ahead in the polls…without the Conservatives having standing in the inquiry (?) before the NDP/Liberals decided when to shut down the inquiry? That sounds reasonable?

The past month (from early June 2022) or so has brought out a number of clarifications about what exactly transpired during this winter’s freedom convoy and what went on behind the scenes before and during the controversial invoking of the Act. And many of them expose how a lot of what the federal Liberal government was leading people to believe was just outright falsehoods.


The Liberals insisted that they only brought in the Act after police requested it (my colleague Lorne Gunter found at least six examples of Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino making this claim). However, at committee the heads of both the Ottawa police and RCMP said they never made such a request.

Then there’s Justice Minister David Lametti’s claim that malicious foreigners were funding the convoy. But testimony revealed that no level of law enforcement ever told them this. Finance Canada even testified that the convoy was mostly supported by small donations from thousands of average Canadians.

“…& the Conservatives as Government Opposition (unlike the NDP who are also Government Opposition?) opposed this? Those Bastards! How Dare they?!!”

Trudeau has already attempted to politically interfere in the inquiry by trying to frame the terms of reference — saying the purpose of the inquiry is to probe things like funding and supposed disinformation. The Liberals refuse to acknowledge that a large part — arguably the main part — is to probe their very decision to invoke the Act.
1664723019967.jpeg

It doesn’t matter though. Because it’s not up to Trudeau to define the scope of the inquiry. It’s up to Justice Rouleau, who is surely aware of how the Parliamentary committee has already weakened the government’s arguments in advance of his work commencing.

That’s quite something, because this first committee is arguably the one rigged in Trudeau’s favour. During some of the meetings, Liberal MPs on the committee have interjected to try to stop tough questions from being asked and have lobbed softball questions to testifying cabinet ministers. These partisan stunts will be much harder (but not impossible) to pull off under Justice Paul Rouleau, the inquiry’s Commissioner.
 

taxme

Time Out
Feb 11, 2020
2,349
976
113

If Freeland and her globalist liberal ilk could get away with it they would have anyone arrested and charged and sent off to the gulag if they dared to ask a liberal cabinet member a question that do not want to have to answer too. We are already seeing the liberals call anyone who dares to question their authority or questioning their liberal agenda globalist policies as terrorists or extremists and are spreading mis or disinformation about their game plan. We are starting to see true communism in action here in Canada. Don't anyone dare to criticize our government programs and agendas or else. It will be the gulag for you, peasant.

All that is on Freeland's WEF globalist brain dead mind these days is the great WEF globalist reset plan for Canada. Globalist Freeland even sits on the board of the WEF. It would appear as though Freeland has become a terrorist/extremist herself to Canada and Canadians and appears to have only contempt for we the peasants of Canada. The WEF pro globalist liberal party must be defeated in the next election if we are to take back and save our lost freedoms and rights and liberties from these globalist like communists. Works for me. (y)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

taxme

Time Out
Feb 11, 2020
2,349
976
113
Hope it bites them in the ass, but not likely....Too many stupid sheep in this country.

If Pierre gets to be our next PM of Canada, I am pretty sure that Pierre will be giving the liberal party and their ilk followers the boot right up the middle of their globalist liberal arse holes. Make it hurt so much that they would not be able to sit on their arse holes for weeks. Make them pay for all of the globalist vaccine mandate shit that they put Canada and Canadians thru for years now. Works for me. (y)
 

taxme

Time Out
Feb 11, 2020
2,349
976
113
I was aiming for 2040.

I believe that 2040 is already here by the way things look in Canuckistan these days. The freezing of bank accounts and credit cards is the first sign that we peasants are in big time trouble here in Chanukistan. I wonder what Chanukistan will look like when 2040 does get here. I am pretty sure that you and me and thee will not be allowed to express our own personal opinions any longer on websites like this one. I am surprised that this website has not yet been shut down by our dear glorious Marxist dicktator leader in Ottawa. Of course, the Marxist dicktator is probably working on that right now. Holy shit, batman. LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

Taxslave2

Senate Member
Aug 13, 2022
5,206
2,902
113
The Canadian media has been predictably silent on the farmers in Germany protesting high fuel taxes and costly regulations. Another small fringe minority.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Dixie Cup

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,849
8,291
113
B.C.

Taxslave2

Senate Member
Aug 13, 2022
5,206
2,902
113
Just getting this now . It has been going for three or more weeks , of course no mention in Trudeau‘s bought and paid for media .
I posted some of this and the farmers strike on fascistbook, and they labelled it false and misleading.
I guess this is to be expected when CBC is an official "fact checker".
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
31,022
11,292
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
1768864288204.jpeg
How about former deputy prime minister and finance minister Chrystia Freeland? Or current Prime Minister Mark Carney?
1768864347405.jpeg
Either in power, or in an advisory role, it was them, after all, who were responsible for the gross overreach in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic-era trucker’s Freedom Convoy in Ottawa in 2022 – something a Canadian court now acknowledges.

The bad guys (Surprise…not surprised), as it turns out, were not Tamara Lich, Chris Barber, Pat King or Harold Jonker but government officials who went too far. They not only took Canada into quasi martial law, police state-like status but took political prisoners along the way.

The Federal Court of Appeal just ruled in favour of the truckers Friday.
“We are of the opinion that every appeal before this court should be dismissed. The Federal Court correctly determined that the declaration of a public order emergency was unreasonable” and “we are satisfied” there was a “right to assemble” and the appeal’s court has decided to “decline to address the cross-appeal.”

Using the Emergencies Act, which was once known as the War Measures Act, was certainly unreasonable to use on people protesting government and not putting the country in any security risk.

A year ago, as reported in the Toronto Sun, Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley “concluded that the decision to issue the Proclamation does not bear the hallmarks of reasonableness – justification, transparency and intelligibility – and was not justified in relation to the relevant factual and legal constraints that were required to be taken into consideration.”

Mosley added, “there can be only one reasonable interpretation” of the Emergencies Act and CSIS Act, and that he believes “the legal constraints on the discretion of the GIC to declare a public order emergency were not satisfied.”

Opposition Pierre Poilievre posted on X a year ago in the wake of the Federal Court decision: “Judge rules Trudeau broke the highest law in the land with the Emergencies Act.”
Unreasonable! Oops. The appeals court agrees. Does this ruling mean people who lost their jobs, had their bank accounts or fundraising money frozen, or those trampled by police horses, went to jail or still face house arrest will get an apology now? One hasn’t come so far. But they are owed one.

This, like the authoritarian nature of the management of the pandemic, was always poorly handled by those in charge. They had distain for the truckers and anybody who disagreed with lockdown and vaccine mandates….and they didn’t hide it.

“They are extremists who don’t believe in science, they’re often misogynists, also often racists,” Trudeau said on a French television show in Quebec at the time. “It’s a small group that muscles in, and we have to make a choice in terms of leaders, in terms of the country. Do we tolerate these people?”

When freezing people’s bank accounts, leaving them without the means to live in the middle of the 2022 winter, Freeland said with a smile “the consequences are real and they will bite.”

I remember watching this at the time thinking, she’s squirming too much…I think she’s having an orgasm.😳

And Carney (yes, the same Carney), who was an economic advisor to Trudeau, penned a piece in the Globe and Mail in which he called those donating to the cause participating in “incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority” and “anyone sending money to the Convoy should be in no doubt: you are funding sedition.”
This was from a guy who just made trade, sovereignty and security agreements with the same communist China that not long ago held two innocent Canadians in prison and also was deemed to have interfered with Canada’s democracy.

None of them were right. It was just a peaceful protest with two days of honking horns and three weeks of bouncy castles, hot tubs and pancake breakfasts. They all overreacted.

One of the organizers, Tamara Lich of Medicine Hat Alberta, didn’t do anything like make a deal with communist China. The patriot was one of the people who had assets locked and also spent 49 days in jail without bail after her mischief arrest, and to this day she is still under house arrest for a conviction that came three years later.

She called the ruling “bittersweet.” Sweet in that she and her sidekick Barber, and others, were proven right and that they were made into political prisoners over what should have been nothing more than a slap on the wrist at most. Bitter in that her legal challenges and expenses linger.

Now working for Rebel News, to show the indignity she has been hit with by the weight of the Canadian government that was unreasonable, the Metis grandmother had to meet with her probation officer yesterday and has to follow strict rules while at work and also has a curfew.

“I’m relieved that this morning’s Federal Court of Appeal ruling upheld Justice Mosley’s decision that the invocation of the Emergencies Act was unconstitutional,” she told the Toronto Sun. “This is an important win for the rights and freedoms of all Canadians going forward!” A generational civil liberties victory has been upheld. On Jan. 16, the Federal Court of Appeal held that the Trudeau government illegally invoked the Emergencies Act in 2022 in response to the Freedom Convoy.
It also shows who the real bad guys actually were and who should feel the pain of what it’s like to have the government freeze their own money.

The unanimous judgment, which upheld the lower court’s decision in 2024, is meticulous, devastating, and leaves little room for doubt. Future governments facing political turmoil have been put on clear notice: they cannot casually reach for emergency powers to solve a domestic protest.

The act was deliberately crafted as a response to the abuses of the War Measures Act, infamously deployed by the other Trudeau during the October Crisis in 1970. Parliament replaced that law with one designed to restrain executive power, not expand it. As the Federal Court of Appeal emphasized, “one must not lose sight … of the history of the Act and of the context in which it was adopted.” Parliament, the court noted, “precisely circumscribed Cabinet’s discretion” to prevent the casual or political use of emergency powers. Yet that is exactly what happened in February 2022.

The Trudeau (Trudeau Junior in this case) government invoked the Emergencies Act in response to noisy and disruptive protests in Ottawa and blockades at several border crossings. The court rejected, point by point, the government’s attempt to justify that decision.
The prime minister invoked it, and bears principal responsibility for it, but the New Democratic Party’s vote to support it on Monday night kept it in force until the government finally relented late Wednesday. Had the NDP voted with the other opposition parties, the emergency powers would have immediately been revoked. Singh’s responsibility thus (also) invites careful examination.
The court flatly rejected that argument. “To claim that the threshold for declaring a public order emergency … could be lower than the threshold for using the surveillance powers … under the CSIS Act would make little sense,” it wrote. “If anything, it should be the reverse.” Emergency powers, the judges made clear, demand more justification, not less — particularly when they authorize “a vast array of draconian powers without any prior authorization.”
Justin Trudeau alone could not have wrapped the great security blanket around all 38 million Canadian citizens if he could not have found a partner, one as stern and steely-eyed as himself. Another warrior-politician to stand up against the forces of chaos and rebellion that have threatened the actual existence of Canada over these past horrendous three weeks with their parked trucks, nightly barbecues, sing-a-longs and Hitler-coded Honk Honks.
Even more damaging was the court’s assessment of the evidence. Aside from the situation in Coutts, where a weapons cache was discovered but resolved using ordinary law before the Emergencies Act was invoked, there was no credible proof of serious violence: “When properly understood as requiring bodily harm, the evidence is quite simply lacking.”

CSIS itself had assessed that there was no threat to national security, and the government invoked emergency powers before a requested alternative threat assessment was completed. The court’s conclusion was blunt: “As disturbing and disruptive as the blockades and protests could be, they fell well short of a threat to national security.”
There never was an illegal occupation until turdOWE's thugs showed up. Canadians have a charter right to peaceful protest in front of the legislature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
31,022
11,292
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
As of January 16, 2026, the Federal Court of Appeal has upheld a ruling that the Liberal government’s 2022 invocation of the Emergencies Act was unreasonable, unlawful, and violated Charter rights. The ruling creates a precedent that limits how future governments can use the Emergencies Act, affirming it is "not a blank cheque".

While this ruling confirms the actions were improper, whether Justin Trudeau will be "punished" is a matter of political and future legal proceedings rather than immediate criminal penalties. The ruling opens the door for individuals whose bank accounts were frozen or who were directly affected to pursue lawsuits against the government for damages. The federal government is reviewing the decision to determine if they will seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.
The court's rejection of the government's argument—which the court described as "so constitutionally radical, so divorced from Canadian democratic traditions"—damages the government's justification for the action…but Trudeau is so politically toxic at this point, and also out of government with his full pension, that it’s irrelevant to him. Carney as a Trudeau adviser was in this up to his beady eyes, & yet a certain segment of the Canadian population, voted him in anyway.

The court ruling is a civil law matter (judicial review) regarding the legality of a government decision. It does not initiate criminal charges against the Prime Minister, current or former Liberal PM in this case.

It would sure be interesting to see every last person that had their bank account froze over this government overreach personally and individually sue Trudeau, Freeland, & Carney among others with at least the three of these, having to show up due to subpoena for each, and every civil suit filed against them…until approximately the end of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,849
8,291
113
B.C.
View attachment 32821
How about former deputy prime minister and finance minister Chrystia Freeland? Or current Prime Minister Mark Carney?
View attachment 32822
Either in power, or in an advisory role, it was them, after all, who were responsible for the gross overreach in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic-era trucker’s Freedom Convoy in Ottawa in 2022 – something a Canadian court now acknowledges.

The bad guys (Surprise…not surprised), as it turns out, were not Tamara Lich, Chris Barber, Pat King or Harold Jonker but government officials who went too far. They not only took Canada into quasi martial law, police state-like status but took political prisoners along the way.

The Federal Court of Appeal just ruled in favour of the truckers Friday.
“We are of the opinion that every appeal before this court should be dismissed. The Federal Court correctly determined that the declaration of a public order emergency was unreasonable” and “we are satisfied” there was a “right to assemble” and the appeal’s court has decided to “decline to address the cross-appeal.”

Using the Emergencies Act, which was once known as the War Measures Act, was certainly unreasonable to use on people protesting government and not putting the country in any security risk.

A year ago, as reported in the Toronto Sun, Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley “concluded that the decision to issue the Proclamation does not bear the hallmarks of reasonableness – justification, transparency and intelligibility – and was not justified in relation to the relevant factual and legal constraints that were required to be taken into consideration.”

Mosley added, “there can be only one reasonable interpretation” of the Emergencies Act and CSIS Act, and that he believes “the legal constraints on the discretion of the GIC to declare a public order emergency were not satisfied.”

Opposition Pierre Poilievre posted on X a year ago in the wake of the Federal Court decision: “Judge rules Trudeau broke the highest law in the land with the Emergencies Act.”
Unreasonable! Oops. The appeals court agrees. Does this ruling mean people who lost their jobs, had their bank accounts or fundraising money frozen, or those trampled by police horses, went to jail or still face house arrest will get an apology now? One hasn’t come so far. But they are owed one.

This, like the authoritarian nature of the management of the pandemic, was always poorly handled by those in charge. They had distain for the truckers and anybody who disagreed with lockdown and vaccine mandates….and they didn’t hide it.

“They are extremists who don’t believe in science, they’re often misogynists, also often racists,” Trudeau said on a French television show in Quebec at the time. “It’s a small group that muscles in, and we have to make a choice in terms of leaders, in terms of the country. Do we tolerate these people?”

When freezing people’s bank accounts, leaving them without the means to live in the middle of the 2022 winter, Freeland said with a smile “the consequences are real and they will bite.”

I remember watching this at the time thinking, she’s squirming too much…I think she’s having an orgasm.😳

And Carney (yes, the same Carney), who was an economic advisor to Trudeau, penned a piece in the Globe and Mail in which he called those donating to the cause participating in “incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority” and “anyone sending money to the Convoy should be in no doubt: you are funding sedition.”
This was from a guy who just made trade, sovereignty and security agreements with the same communist China that not long ago held two innocent Canadians in prison and also was deemed to have interfered with Canada’s democracy.

None of them were right. It was just a peaceful protest with two days of honking horns and three weeks of bouncy castles, hot tubs and pancake breakfasts. They all overreacted.

One of the organizers, Tamara Lich of Medicine Hat Alberta, didn’t do anything like make a deal with communist China. The patriot was one of the people who had assets locked and also spent 49 days in jail without bail after her mischief arrest, and to this day she is still under house arrest for a conviction that came three years later.

She called the ruling “bittersweet.” Sweet in that she and her sidekick Barber, and others, were proven right and that they were made into political prisoners over what should have been nothing more than a slap on the wrist at most. Bitter in that her legal challenges and expenses linger.

Now working for Rebel News, to show the indignity she has been hit with by the weight of the Canadian government that was unreasonable, the Metis grandmother had to meet with her probation officer yesterday and has to follow strict rules while at work and also has a curfew.

“I’m relieved that this morning’s Federal Court of Appeal ruling upheld Justice Mosley’s decision that the invocation of the Emergencies Act was unconstitutional,” she told the Toronto Sun. “This is an important win for the rights and freedoms of all Canadians going forward!” A generational civil liberties victory has been upheld. On Jan. 16, the Federal Court of Appeal held that the Trudeau government illegally invoked the Emergencies Act in 2022 in response to the Freedom Convoy.
It also shows who the real bad guys actually were and who should feel the pain of what it’s like to have the government freeze their own money.

The unanimous judgment, which upheld the lower court’s decision in 2024, is meticulous, devastating, and leaves little room for doubt. Future governments facing political turmoil have been put on clear notice: they cannot casually reach for emergency powers to solve a domestic protest.

The act was deliberately crafted as a response to the abuses of the War Measures Act, infamously deployed by the other Trudeau during the October Crisis in 1970. Parliament replaced that law with one designed to restrain executive power, not expand it. As the Federal Court of Appeal emphasized, “one must not lose sight … of the history of the Act and of the context in which it was adopted.” Parliament, the court noted, “precisely circumscribed Cabinet’s discretion” to prevent the casual or political use of emergency powers. Yet that is exactly what happened in February 2022.

The Trudeau (Trudeau Junior in this case) government invoked the Emergencies Act in response to noisy and disruptive protests in Ottawa and blockades at several border crossings. The court rejected, point by point, the government’s attempt to justify that decision.

The court flatly rejected that argument. “To claim that the threshold for declaring a public order emergency … could be lower than the threshold for using the surveillance powers … under the CSIS Act would make little sense,” it wrote. “If anything, it should be the reverse.” Emergency powers, the judges made clear, demand more justification, not less — particularly when they authorize “a vast array of draconian powers without any prior authorization.”

Even more damaging was the court’s assessment of the evidence. Aside from the situation in Coutts, where a weapons cache was discovered but resolved using ordinary law before the Emergencies Act was invoked, there was no credible proof of serious violence: “When properly understood as requiring bodily harm, the evidence is quite simply lacking.”

CSIS itself had assessed that there was no threat to national security, and the government invoked emergency powers before a requested alternative threat assessment was completed. The court’s conclusion was blunt: “As disturbing and disruptive as the blockades and protests could be, they fell well short of a threat to national security.”
Kind of mocks “ Glorious and free “ doesn’t it ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,490
4,088
113
Edmonton
As of January 16, 2026, the Federal Court of Appeal has upheld a ruling that the Liberal government’s 2022 invocation of the Emergencies Act was unreasonable, unlawful, and violated Charter rights. The ruling creates a precedent that limits how future governments can use the Emergencies Act, affirming it is "not a blank cheque".

While this ruling confirms the actions were improper, whether Justin Trudeau will be "punished" is a matter of political and future legal proceedings rather than immediate criminal penalties. The ruling opens the door for individuals whose bank accounts were frozen or who were directly affected to pursue lawsuits against the government for damages. The federal government is reviewing the decision to determine if they will seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.
The court's rejection of the government's argument—which the court described as "so constitutionally radical, so divorced from Canadian democratic traditions"—damages the government's justification for the action…but Trudeau is so politically toxic at this point, and also out of government with his full pension, that it’s irrelevant to him. Carney as a Trudeau adviser was in this up to his beady eyes, & yet a certain segment of the Canadian population, voted him in anyway.

The court ruling is a civil law matter (judicial review) regarding the legality of a government decision. It does not initiate criminal charges against the Prime Minister, current or former Liberal PM in this case.

It would sure be interesting to see every last person that had their bank account froze over this government overreach personally and individually sue Trudeau, Freeland, & Carney among others with at least the three of these, having to show up due to subpoena for each, and every civil suit filed against them…until approximately the end of time.
I hope the truckers sue the hell out of Trudy & his minions, not that it'll come to anything. Seems everything has gone upside down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina