Well - gross overreach or abuse of powers at the very least for sure.
That using the Emergencies Act to clear out the freedom convoy protest this past winter was an overreaction should be the inescapable conclusion of all but the most ardent of Trudeau apologists. The judicial
inquiry set up by the government as required by the act and which begins next month will hopefully provide clearer answers as to why a state of emergency was declared. But, unless previously unheard of evidence that Canada’s democracy really was an inch from collapsing emerges, a terrible precedent will have been set. Don’t agree? Just imagine a future government using the act to clear away, say, climate protesters.
A lawless federal government is a greater threat than the convoy
apple.news
The Emergencies Act corrected much of the overreach of the previous War Measures Act, which allowed for unconstitutional and arbitrary powers. The newer law limits what cabinet can do during an emergency, and conforms to the Constitution, including the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
These safeguards only matter, however, if the government actually follows them. Unfortunately, it seems increasingly clear that invoking the Emergencies Act during the freedom convoy protests and border blockades was done arbitrarily.
We still don’t know why Ottawa police, or the Ontario Provincial Police or the RCMP were unable to clear or contain the protests earlier. Good old incompetence, or buck passing between jurisdictions, or the increasingly arbitrary use of police powers against protesters of all persuasions, seem as credible explanations as any.
Perhaps more compelling evidence will surface, but if it doesn’t, whatever the threat posed by the convoy, it was nothing compared with the federal government’s own lawlessness.