WE really need to get rid of this guy

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
19,753
98
48
B.C.
To the first part, wow, agree, holy ****ing shit no. Yes, yes, oh that. Eye roll.

And to your final question.


Yes, because Biden sucks too. I think Trump would have won if not for the pandemic. 250,000 dead can swing a lot of votes.

The last four years have been complete lunacy, he's hired and fired more contestants than on that stupid show of his. He is embarrassment to the country he leads, calling fallen soldiers "Suckers and losers." The Republicans need to reclaim their party after this pig of president is gone. He is a raving idiot, lacking common sense or grace, and I suggest his cheese is sliding off his cracker.
P.S. Trump never called soldiers suckers and losers , the press said Trump said that . Why would you believe them ? they are the same press hiding We from the Canadian public and not on your side .
 

petros

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 21, 2008
94,731
361
83
Moccasin Flats
Well he doesn’t want to take your guns away . His successors have different ideas . Go ahead follow the media into the boxcars with no guns in your cold dead hands .
Exactly. What we see in reality isnt what TV says it is.

Go by verifiable statistics. Who cares what's on TV?

Are some stuck watching the afternoon hen shows?

The opinions of the wife of the Prince of Darkness are held in reverence?

Going off the rails on the crazy train.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
13,279
102
63
Twin Moose Creek
To the first part, wow, agree, holy ****ing shit no. Yes, yes, oh that. Eye roll.
And to your final question.
Yes, because Biden sucks too. I think Trump would have won if not for the pandemic. 250,000 dead can swing a lot of votes.
The last four years have been complete lunacy, he's hired and fired more contestants than on that stupid show of his. He is embarrassment to the country he leads, calling fallen soldiers "Suckers and losers." The Republicans need to reclaim their party after this pig of president is gone. He is a raving idiot, lacking common sense or grace, and I suggest his cheese is sliding off his cracker.

The bolded makes you wonder how many did vote in this election
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
15,216
122
63
Regina, Saskatchewan
Getting away from the American politics and back to Canadian politics with respect to this whole WE fiasco, & the Trudeau Liberal’s default position of openness and transparency.... this is rearing its ugly head again. Something is happening here and may be the Trudeau liberals are actually going to be open and transparent (it might happen but probably not) with respect to this whole shenanigans situation....
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
19,753
98
48
B.C.
Getting away from the American politics and back to Canadian politics with respect to this whole WE fiasco, & the Trudeau Liberal’s default position of openness and transparency.... this is rearing its ugly head again. Something is happening here and may be the Trudeau liberals are actually going to be open and transparent (it might happen but probably not) with respect to this whole shenanigans situation....
They are openly and transparently destroying the evidence as we speak .
 

petros

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 21, 2008
94,731
361
83
Moccasin Flats
Getting away from the American politics and back to Canadian politics with respect to this whole WE fiasco, & the Trudeau Liberal’s default position of openness and transparency.... this is rearing its ugly head again. Something is happening here and may be the Trudeau liberals are actually going to be open and transparent (it might happen but probably not) with respect to this whole shenanigans situation....
The WE scandal has grown into a Global phenomenon.

https://globalnews.ca/news/7362204/we-charity-international-examination/
 

Jinentonix

Executive Branch Member
Sep 6, 2015
7,616
125
63
Olympus Mons
The question is, "Why?" Why are people supporting him?
The answer is "The United States is a nation steeped in racism."
And the Democrats are the ones keeping it there. Biden helped Clinton create legislation in 1994 that was punitive towards Black people. The for-profit prison system saw an even greater disproportion of Black people railroaded into prisons. More inmates means mo' money. He also was responsible for classifying crack separately from powder coke and making the penalties for possession of crack MUCH harsher. And guess who the predominant users of crack were and guess who the predominant users of powder were? Go on, take a wild stab at it.


Trump OTOH, restored the funding to HBCUs that the previous BLACK president had slashed. He joined up with Ice Cube to create a community investment and development fund for Black people and their communities. He's also the FIRST president/candidate who actually engaged with young Black people.


The cities where all the rioting and shit took place about police brutality and racist cops were all in Democrat run cities, most of which have been Democrat for decades. But it's all Trump's fault of course.


Trump didn't "divide Americans, Obama did the moment he started engaging in the politics of division via the stupid identity politics game. The MSM has also helped with that divide by focusing almost entirely on Black people being killed by cops while ignoring everyone else who gets killed by the cops.



Here's my challenge to you RCS. Show proof of Trump's racism. And I don't mean some lame MSM propaganda. Show me concrete, solid proof that a man who has done more for Black Americans than any other president in the modern era is a racist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Twin_Moose

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
15,216
122
63
Regina, Saskatchewan
Here's my challenge to you RCS. Show proof of Trump's racism. And I don't mean some lame MSM propaganda. Show me concrete, solid proof that a man who has done more for Black Americans than any other president in the modern era is a racist.
I'll take a stab at this one (& I'm not Trump Fan-Boy) in an effort to transition this thread back to Canadian Politics. I don't recall Trump being caught in Blackface/Brownface so many times that he could even tell you how many times he'd done it....but maybe Trump isn't woke enough like our own clown.....& on that note & circling BACK to Canada & Canadian Politics: http://www.cjme.com/2020/11/16/liberals-say-they-will-back-off-delay-tactics-on-we-charity-affair/

OTTAWA — The Liberals said Monday they will cede some ground on the WE Charity affair, which has been mired in filibusters and duelling committee motions for nearly two months — but appeared to yield only minimal turf. Government House leader Pablo Rodriguez said his party has agreed to send unredacted documents linked to the controversy to the parliamentary law clerk, who will then decide what information needs to be blacked out to protect personal privacy.

Awesome, right?

The mild concession came in response to a Conservative motion that calls on the Speaker of the Commons to rule that redactions made to more than 5,000 pages of government documents on the WE affair amount to a breach of the finance committee's privileges. "We have now agreed to send unredacted documents to the Law Clerk, except those that were redacted to protect cabinet confidences and unrelated material (?) as already allowed by the committee motion," Rodriguez said Monday in a Twitter post.

His proposal differs somewhat from the Conservative motion, which would leave it in the law clerk's hands to black out confidential cabinet communications and irrelevant content (?). Conservative finance critic Pierre Poilievre said cabinet confidences make up nearly half of the originally submitted documents, with "unrelated material" (?) also hidden from view. Rodriguez's new proposal would make no difference other than to disclose the names and phone numbers of some individuals that were redacted for privacy concerns. Nonetheless, Poilievre said his party is willing to meet the Liberals halfway.

"If the government insists that it needs to put aside what it claims are cabinet confidences, fine, we’ll do that for now," he said Monday at a news conference. The issue of unrelated documents (?) arriving in the law clerk's hands already redacted remains a "sticking point," he added, leaving it up in the air whether the Tories will accept Rodriguez's compromise.

"If they’re totally unrelated to the WE controversy, why did the government put them in the bundle of WE documents and then cover them in black ink?" Poilievre asked. "We just want the parliamentary law clerk to look at them and confirm whether or not they are irrelevant to our study." Anyway, the rest of the story at the LINK above....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Twin_Moose