I'm beginning to think that collateral damage is part of the US strategy to prolong their wars and make more money.
Wrong.
there is a distinct difference......
The Americans are willing to kill civilians to get at their targets.........although in some cases it is impossible to differentiate between civilians and a legitimate target........I'd like to really know how many of the "innocents" killed were not active supporters of the Taliban and al-queda...
but I digress....
The Americans are willing to kill civilians if it is unavoidable in the pursuit of their goals.
Al-queda exists ONLY to kill civilians.
Drones don't kill people.
People who operate drones kill people.
A hard concept for some to grasp, but as much as 80% of the US economy is concentrated in the military/industrial complex. World Peace would destroy their economy. "Strafe them creeps in the rice paddy Daddy!"War is the economy.
I was gonna say it's not a good way to get people on your side and win the hearts and minds but I didn't, thinking you would poo poo that.....I guess I was wrong.
Yet you still defend bombing a few hundred cilvilians to kill one or two terrorists.
EAO....I was not defending American overkill......I don't know how important the targets were, how "innocent" the civilians were, and I agree that the loss of civilian life is very seriously detrimental to the cause.....so I choose not to comment on that.
Risus, I been hanging out with my wife for almost 39 years.....since I was 16....in that time I have not so much as fired a shot in her general direction. Honest. lol
Wrong.
there is a distinct difference......
The Americans are willing to kill civilians to get at their targets.........although in some cases it is impossible to differentiate between civilians and a legitimate target........I'd like to really know how many of the "innocents" killed were not active supporters of the Taliban and al-queda...
but I digress....
The Americans are willing to kill civilians if it is unavoidable in the pursuit of their goals.
Al-queda exists ONLY to kill civilians.
The same thing happened in VietNamBelieve what you want Colpy, but the evidence is overwhelming that at least a few American soldiers have murdered Iraqi civilians for little to no good reason knowing that they will not be held accountable. I can provide many examples to back up this point.
Some of you have a major misunderstanding of just what a warrior does. We are not sent to any place to build schools and get people to love us. We are sent by our country to do work that no one else wants to do. You want to build schools, send construction workers, you want them to learn, send teachers. When you send a warrior do not expect them to be nice. A warrior is only responsible to two people when being shot at, those to his right and left, and himself. Everyone else is the enemy.
Somebody starts shooting at you from a crowd, what do you do? In Iraq and Afghanistan, you shoot back. You do not have time to check everyone out before returning fire.
Ever wonder how many civilians were killed by for want of a better word the terrorists.
dailygleaner.com - Canadian soldiers killed four civilians last year | By COLIN PERKEL - Breaking News, New Brunswick, Canada
Just an example.
Get over it, it happens.