1 every three days is the going rate. Up from 1 a week a couple years ago.
I stand corrected. I knew it was lots....fast....but wow!
1 every three days is the going rate. Up from 1 a week a couple years ago.
It's Obamas fault? Obama doesn't say what the AF can or can't fly.
The Chinese aircraft is made from just about anything that can be scrounged up. It is probably 15 years if even that from production. You cannot cheat and create a fleet of sophisticated aircraft as is suggested.
Now as for the problem with the F-22, it might have been rushed into production. The OBOGGS system has been around for years on many jets; this is just the latest version. Whether it is the true reason for the "grounding" remains to be seen, if we the public are ever told the truth. As my military career taught me numerous times, the best way to hide a secret was in plain sight. Ground the fleet, blame the O2 system (logical cause of Alaska crash), fly the jets anyway, say nothing. It is the perfect cover. Back in the mid 1980's, the F-117 flew along the East German borders numerous times. The Soviet built radar's never responded to the intruder as they would to something like an F-15, -16, etc. This was before the jet was announced to the world. It confirmed that Stealth worked. And it still does; The F-117 that was shot down was targeted by electro-optical means, not some sort of radar mumbo-jumbo that some people want you to believe.
Plus I do not think the F-22 fleet is as grounded as some want us to believe unless President Obama had a hand in it.
I don't see how anyone can conclude it would fly circles around an F22 when the engines haven't even been developed yet.
Plus, it's made in China. I'm not losing any sleep.![]()
I did not say he said that, but his team have been cutting our defense back.A handdful of planes and jet engines is NOTHING. I hope they are grateful for us building them up one dollar store purchase at a time.
It's Obamas fault? Obama doesn't say what the AF can or can't fly.
If someone comes up with a gizmo that screws up the computer, they all fly like a brick.
The sky isn't falling. nanananannannan :roll:There is no collapse?
China will also collapse and in a much shorter time frame as they have no sence of
decency or ethics to start with.
It's for a wheelbarrows. WTF else would an aircraft carrier be used for?
AFP
WASHINGTON — The United States said Wednesday it would like China to explain why it needs an aircraft carrier amid broader US concerns about Beijing's lack of transparency over its military aims.
"We would welcome any kind of explanation that China would like to give for needing this kind of equipment," State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland told reporters when asked whether the carrier would raise regional tensions.
"This is part of our larger concern that China is not as transparent as other countries. It's not as transparent as the United States about its military acquisitions, about its military budget," she said.
"And we'd like to have the kind of open, transparent relationship in military-to-military affairs," Nuland said.
"In our military-to-military relations with many countries around the world, we have the kind of bilateral dialogue where we can get quite specific about the equipment that we have and its intended purposes and its intended movements," she said.
But China and the United States are "not at that level of transparency" to which the two nations aspire, Nuland added.
The comments came hours after China's first aircraft carrier embarked on its inaugural sea trial, a move likely to stoke concerns about the nation's military expansion and growing territorial assertiveness.
Beijing only recently confirmed it was revamping an old Soviet ship to be its first carrier and has sought to play down the vessel's capability, saying it will mainly be used for training and "research."
Japan and China still argue over islands. Taiwan is in Beijing's good books these days investing places China can't for China.
Good artical about the carrier.
China's neighbors, particularly Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines, have responded with tough talk and posturing of their own. Last year China and Japan sparred over islands in the East China Sea that Japan administers and both nations claim, known as the Diaoyu to the Chinese and the Senkaku to the Japanese. When Japan detained a Chinese trawler captain near the islands, China cried foul. Two weeks later Japan released the fisherman, who returned to a hero's welcome in China. This summer, Chinese warships passed through international waters near Okinawa, which has unsettled Tokyo. Japan's latest white paper on national defense said Chinese military modernization, increased activities in Asian waters and lack of transparency "are becoming a cause for concern in the region and within the international community."
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2087973,00.html?xid=newsletter-weekly