Trump America : 200 days Plus......
- Thread starter Ocean Breeze
- Start date
The US was built on the dead bodies of its indigenous peoples, the theft of their land and the invasion of, the interference of, the murder of and the theft of the resources of countless other countries. Whatever happens to the US will be Karma. Trump is their Nero. They will reap what they have sown.
An unread point of view. Your words are meaningless and ignorant.
You cannot steal that which belongs to no one. Indigenous people did not own any land. They have always said that no one owns the land. Don't put words in the mouths of others.
The US is made up of many different cultures and belief systems. You have condemned them all. You blame everyone when you speak these silly words, "They will reap what they have sown."
Your ignorance is staggering. You are invited to silence.
You cannot steal that which belongs to no one. Indigenous people did not own any land. They have always said that no one owns the land. Don't put words in the mouths of others.
The US is made up of many different cultures and belief systems. You have condemned them all. You blame everyone when you speak these silly words, "They will reap what they have sown."
Your ignorance is staggering. You are invited to silence.
Cliffy, when you exaggerate the account of history, it just detracts from your credibility! Today I watched the account of the cruelty bestowed by Assad on the people of Syria...............similar to that of the death camps at Aushwitz and Birkenau. You've expounded at length on the cruelty perpetrated by George Bush, Obama and Trump, it's all just laughable when compared to the likes of Assad, Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Myomar Khadaffy, Kim Jung Il, etc. etc. etc.
http://remember.org/camps/birkenau/bir-introduction
Here's some reading for you Cliffy on one of the worst concentration camps in Europe and accounts by descendants of the victims, some of whom live in the U.S. today. Maybe they can give you an opinion of how cruel Bush and Trump are!
Last edited:
How many years has America not been at war?
The U.S. Has Been At War 222 Out of 239 Years. This morning, I discovered an interesting statistic, America Has Been At War 93% of the Time – 222 Out of 239 Years – Since 1776, i.e. the U.S. has only been at peace for less than 20 years total since its birth.Mar 19, 2017
The US has killed millions of innocent women, children and elderly while invading and bombing them back to the stone age. You don't lecture me on what has been going on. I have been focusing my attention on it for over 50 years. You choose to believe the Yankie propaganda. That is your problem. I do my research and it ain't what you think.
"The cost of sanity, in this society, is a certain level of alienation." ~ Terence McKenna
Last edited:
Cliffy, someone needs to lecture you on how to interpret information and remind you to stick with one topic. Don't wander around. Write coherently.
You wrote,
"The US has killed millions of innocent women, children and elderly while invading and bombing them back to the stone age."
You don't invade people. You invade countries. And how does invading a country tie into your statement about murdering indigenous people earlier in this thread?
Stick with one topic and logically link your points together.
Focusing your attention on something does not mean that your interpretations are correct. And it certainly does not give your rambling posts any credibility.
What you perceive to be "Yankie (sic) propaganda" is your opinion, not a statement of fact.
JLM has no problem. He doesn't have to believe your opinions, especially when you attempt to support those opinions with statements like, "I have been focusing my attention on it for over 50 years." So? Are we to believe that your 50 years of focus resulted in any valid conclusions?
Further, he wasn't lecturing you about anything. He stated that when you exaggerate, your credibility plummets. I agree with this. You do exaggerate. He tried to engage in the conversation, comparing what is happening in Syria with WWII concentration camps. He provided a cite to back his statement.
Finally, as to doing your research, given your disjointed post, we certainly don't know what to think.
You wrote,
"The US has killed millions of innocent women, children and elderly while invading and bombing them back to the stone age."
You don't invade people. You invade countries. And how does invading a country tie into your statement about murdering indigenous people earlier in this thread?
Stick with one topic and logically link your points together.
Focusing your attention on something does not mean that your interpretations are correct. And it certainly does not give your rambling posts any credibility.
What you perceive to be "Yankie (sic) propaganda" is your opinion, not a statement of fact.
JLM has no problem. He doesn't have to believe your opinions, especially when you attempt to support those opinions with statements like, "I have been focusing my attention on it for over 50 years." So? Are we to believe that your 50 years of focus resulted in any valid conclusions?
Further, he wasn't lecturing you about anything. He stated that when you exaggerate, your credibility plummets. I agree with this. You do exaggerate. He tried to engage in the conversation, comparing what is happening in Syria with WWII concentration camps. He provided a cite to back his statement.
Finally, as to doing your research, given your disjointed post, we certainly don't know what to think.
Last edited:
So the order of the words is more important to the collective than a million or so dead people, innocent people? Do you know how fuked that thinking is?
Seriously, WTFuk is wrong with you??
Seriously, WTFuk is wrong with you??
You can flap your gums all you want. It doesn't change the fact that you have health issues.
There can be no other reason for your hatred and anger. You need help. I hope you get it. In the meantime, have a Reese's Peanut Butter cup and tell us how the Jews are plotting against the world to destroy everything. :lol:
Once the UN is moved to Jerusalem of course. :lol:
There can be no other reason for your hatred and anger. You need help. I hope you get it. In the meantime, have a Reese's Peanut Butter cup and tell us how the Jews are plotting against the world to destroy everything. :lol:
Once the UN is moved to Jerusalem of course. :lol:
This is a BBS with typing being the mode of communication.
Who said they destroy anything? (that must have come from inside of you) The theme was the UN would start working correctly once it was in the international city of Jerusalem. You hatred is so strong you can't keep anything in it's right context.
BTW as far as being my guide through the Jewish wonderland, 'You're Fired.'
Who said they destroy anything? (that must have come from inside of you) The theme was the UN would start working correctly once it was in the international city of Jerusalem. You hatred is so strong you can't keep anything in it's right context.
BTW as far as being my guide through the Jewish wonderland, 'You're Fired.'
With megahurts....It's all the Joos' fault.....
And if Cliffy doesn't read it on Facebook?.....well it ain't true!
What are you gonna do with characters like that? a special forum for nut cases?
And if Cliffy doesn't read it on Facebook?.....well it ain't true!
What are you gonna do with characters like that? a special forum for nut cases?
Of course they weren't - just for starters from 1918 - 1939, from 1945 - 1950 and for several years between 1975 and 1990!
No Walnut, you are full of bullshit.
alrighty comrades
“Nationalist” refers to a given regime’s desire to nationalize foreign-owned means of production within its national boundaries. It should be readily apparent that such is an unforgivable sin against the foreign policy establishment in the United States.
1893 – Hawaii (Liliuokalani; monarchist): success (OF)
1912 – China (Piyu; monarchist): success (OF)
1918 – Panama (Arias; center-right): success (SE)
1919 – Hungary (Kun; communist): success (CO)
1920 – USSR (Lenin; communist): failure (OF)
1924 – Honduras (Carias; nationalist): success (SE)
1934 – United States (Roosevelt; liberal): failure (CO)
1945 – Japan (Higashikuni; rightist): success (OF)
1946 – Thailand (Pridi; conservative): success (CO)
1946 – Argentina (Peron; military/centrist): failure (SE)
1947 – France (*; communist): success (SE)
1947 – Philippines (*; center-left): success (SE)
1947 – Romania (Gheorghiu-Dej; stalinist): failure (CO)
1948 – Italy (*, communist): success (SE)
1948 – Colombia (Gaitan; populist/leftist): success (SE)
1948 – Peru (Bustamante; left/centrist): success (CO)
1949 – Syria (Kuwatli; neutralist/Pan-Arabist): success (CO)
1949 – China (Mao; communist): failure (CO)
1950 – Albania (Hoxha; communist): failure (CO)
1951 – Bolivia (Paz; center/neutralist): success (CO)
1951 – DPRK (Kim; stalinist): failure (OF)
1951 – Poland (Cyrankiewicz; stalinist): failure (CO)
1951 – Thailand (Phibun; conservative): success (CO)
1952 – Egypt (Farouk; monarchist): success (CO)
1952 – Cuba (Prio; reform/populist): success (CO)
1952 – Lebanon (*; left/populist): success: (SE)
1953 – British Guyana (*; left/populist): success (CO)
1953 – Iran (Mossadegh; liberal nationalist): success (CO)
1953 – Costa Rica (Figueres; reform liberal): failure (CO)
1953 – Philippines (*; center-left): success (SE)
1954 – Guatemala (Arbenz; liberal nationalist): success (OF)
1955 – Costa Rica (Figueres; reform liberal): failure (CO)
1955 – India (Nehru; neutralist/socialist): failure (CO)
1955 – Argentina (Peron; military/centrist): success (CO)
1955 – China (Zhou; communist): failure (CO)
1955 – Vietnam (Ho; communist): success (SE)
1956 – Hungary (Hegedus; communist): success (CO)
1957 – Egypt (Nasser; military/nationalist): failure (CO)
1957 – Haiti (Sylvain; left/populist): success (CO)
1957 – Syria (Kuwatli; neutralist/Pan-Arabist): failure (CO)
1958 – Japan (*; left-center): success (SE)
1958 – Chile (*; leftists): success (SE)
1958 – Iraq (Feisal; monarchist): success (CO)
1958 – Laos (Phouma; nationalist): success (CO)
1958 – Sudan (Sovereignty Council; nationalist): success (CO)
1958 – Lebanon (*; leftist): success (SE)
1958 – Syria (Kuwatli; neutralist/Pan-Arabist): failure (CO)
1958 – Indonesia (Sukarno; militarist/neutralist): failure (SE)
1959 – Laos (Phouma; nationalist): success (CO)
1959 – Nepal (*; left-centrist): success (SE)
1959 – Cambodia (Sihanouk; moderate/neutralist): failure (CO)
1960 – Ecuador (Ponce; left/populist): success (CO)
1960 – Laos (Phouma; nationalist): success (CO)
1960 – Iraq (Qassem; rightist /militarist): failure (CO)
1960 – S. Korea (Syngman; rightist): success (CO)
1960 – Turkey (Menderes; liberal): success (CO)
1961 – Haiti (Duvalier; rightist/militarist): success (CO)
1961 – Cuba (Castro; communist): failure (CO)
1961 – Congo (Lumumba; leftist/pan-Africanist): success (CO)
1961 – Dominican Republic (Trujillo; rightwing/military): success (CO)
1962 – Brazil (Goulart; liberal/neutralist): failure (SE)
1962 – Dominican Republic (*; left/populist): success (SE)
1962 – Indonesia (Sukarno; militarist/neutralist): failure (CO)
1963 – Dominican Republic (Bosch; social democrat): success (CO)
1963 – Honduras (Montes; left/populist): success (CO)
1963 – Iraq (Qassem; militarist/rightist): success (CO)
1963 – S. Vietnam (Diem; rightist): success (CO)
1963 – Cambodia (Sihanouk; moderate/neutralist): failure (CO)
1963 – Guatemala (Ygidoras; rightist/reform): success (CO)
1963 – Ecuador (Velasco; reform militarist): success (CO)
1963 – United States (Kennedy; liberal): success (CO)
1964 – Guyana (Jagan; populist/reformist): success (CO)
1964 – Bolivia (Paz; centrist/neutralist): success (CO)
1964 – Brazil (Goulart; liberal/neutralist): success (CO)
1964 – Chile (Allende; social democrat/marxist): success (SE)
1965 – Indonesia (Sukarno; militarist/neutralist): success (CO)
1966 – Ghana (Nkrumah; leftist/pan-Africanist): success (CO)
1966 – Bolivia (*; leftist): success (SE)
1966 – France (de Gaulle; centrist): failure (CO)
1967 – Greece (Papandreou; social democrat): success (CO)
1968 – Iraq (Arif; rightist): success (CO)
1969 – Panama (Torrijos; military/reform populist): failure (CO)
1969 – Libya (Idris; monarchist): success (CO)
1970 – Bolivia (Ovando; reform nationalist): success (CO)
1970 – Cambodia (Sihanouk; moderate/neutralist): success (CO)
1970 – Chile (Allende; social democrat/Marxist): failure (SE)
1971 – Bolivia (Torres; nationalist/neutralist): success (CO)
1971 – Costa Rica (Figueres; reform liberal): failure (CO)
1971 – Liberia (Tubman; rightist): success (CO)
1971 – Turkey (Demirel; center-right): success (CO)
1971 – Uruguay (Frente Amplio; leftist): success (SE)
1972 – El Salvador (*; leftist): success (SE)
1972 – Australia (Whitlam; liberal/labor): failure (SE)
1973 – Chile (Allende; social democrat/Marxist): success (CO)
1974 – United States (Nixon; centrist): success (CO)
1975 – Australia (Whitlam; liberal/labor): success (CO)
1975 – Congo (Mobutu; military/rightist): failure (CO)
1975 – Bangladesh (Mujib; nationalist): success (CO)
1976 – Jamaica (Manley; social democrat): failure (SE)
1976 – Portugal (JNS; military/leftist): success (SE)
1976 – Nigeria (Mohammed; military/nationalist): success (CO)
1976 – Thailand (*; rightist): success (CO)
1976 – Uruguay (Bordaberry; center-right): success (CO)
1977 – Pakistan (Bhutto: center/nationalist): success (CO)
1978 – Dominican Republic (Balaguer; center): success (SE)
1979 – S. Korea (Park; rightist): success (CO)
1979 – Nicaragua (Sandinistas; leftist): failure (CO)
1980 – Bolivia (Siles; centrist/reform): success (CO)
1980 – Iran (Khomeini; Islamic nationalist): failure (CO)
1980 – Italy (*; leftist): success (SE)
1980 – Liberia (Tolbert; rightist): success (CO)
1980 – Jamaica (Manley; social democrat): success (SE)
1980 – Dominica (Seraphin; leftist): success (SE)
1980 – Turkey (Demirel; center-right): success (CO)
1981 – Seychelles (René; socialist): failure (CO)
1981 – Spain (Suarez; rightist/neutralist): failure (CO)
1981 – Panama (Torrijos; military/reform populist); success (CO)
1981 – Zambia (Kaunda; reform nationalist): failure (CO)
1982 – Mauritius (*; center-left): failure (SE)
1982 – Spain (Suarez; rightist/neutralist): success (SE)
1982 – Iran (Khomeini; Islamic nationalist): failure (CO)
1982 – Chad (Oueddei; Islamic nationalist): success (CO)
1983 – Mozambique (Machel; socialist): failure (CO)
1983 – Grenada (Bishop; socialist): success (OF)
1984 – Panama (*; reform/centrist): success (SE)
1984 – Nicaragua (Sandinistas; leftist): failure (SE)
1984 – Surinam (Bouterse; left/reformist/neutralist): success (CO)
1984 – India (Gandhi; nationalist): success (CO)
1986 – Libya (Qaddafi; Islamic nationalist): failure (OF)
1987 – Fiji (Bavrada; liberal): success (CO)
1989 – Panama (Noriega; military/reform populist): success (OF)
1990 – Haiti (Aristide; liberal reform): failure (SE)
1990 – Nicaragua (Ortega; Christian socialist): success (SE)
1991 – Albania (Alia; communist): success (SE)
1991 – Haiti (Aristide; liberal reform): success (CO)
1991 – Iraq (Hussein; military/rightist): failure (OF)
1991 – Bulgaria (BSP; communist): success (SE)
1992 – Afghanistan (Najibullah; communist): success (CO)
1993 – Somalia (Aidid; right/militarist): failure (OF)
1993 – Cambodia (Han Sen/CPP; leftist): failure (SE)
1993 – Burundi (Ndadaye; conservative): success (CO)
1994 – El Salvador (*; leftist): success (SE)
1994 – Rwanda (Habyarimana; conservative): success (CO)
1994 – Ukraine (Kravchuk; center-left): success (SE)
1996 – Bosnia (Karadzic; centrist): success (CO)
1996 – Russia (Zyuganov; communist): success (SE)
1996 – Congo (Mobutu; military/rightist): success (CO)
1996 – Mongolia (*; center-left): success (SE)
1998 – Congo (Kabila; rightist/military): success (CO)
1998 – United States (Clinton; conservative): failure (CO)
1998 – Indonesia (Suharto; military/rightist): success (CO)
1999 – Yugoslavia (Milosevic; left/nationalist): success (SE)
2000 – United States (Gore; conservative): success (SE)
2000 – Ecuador (NSC; leftist): success: (CO)
2001 – Afghanistan (Omar; rightist/Islamist): success (OF)
2001 – Belarus (Lukashenko; leftist): failure (SE)
2001 – Nicaragua (Ortega; Christian socialist): success (SE)
2001 – Nepal (Birendra; nationalist/monarchist): success (CO)
2002 – Venezuela (Chavez; reform-populist): failure (CO)
2002 – Bolivia (Morales; leftist/MAS): success (SE)
2002 – Brazil (Lula; center-left): failure (SE)
We should keep in mind that the goals of the imperialist in each of these instances are multiple: acquisition of access to local “markets” of all varieties; imposition of neoliberal policy; destruction of any potential alternative to the techno-fascist ruling order; provision of incentive for a sprawling parasitical and parastatal medical-intelligence-military-industrial complex (MIMIC); production of official “villains” for propaganda purposes; intimidation of non-combatants (as in the year 1945), and continuing political hegemony of the transnational elite based in DC.
(in part, very small part)