We Canadians are reading and seeing the turmoil that is being displayed by the Liberals in Ottawa over the SNC Lavalin affair. The prime minister (herein after referred to Just-in) is giving the appearance that he has not any thing wrong, yet every time he tries to bury the affair, another ugly head appears. We can also relate the issue to him playing poker. He is betting the house with a pair of two’s, not realizing that other people, like Jodi Wilson-Raybould has Aces. Should we expect anything different from a drama teacher?
What I have in the back of my mind is that the Liberals are saying to SNC, do anything that you want, and we will forgive you by making sure that you do not get penalized. The change in the Legislation last fall made it apparent that is what the intent is, and not what the Liberals are saying, other countries do this, so we should follow suit. Are the Liberals saying, it will be OK for SNC to kill people who do not agree with them, and the Liberals will get you off? I see that the Liberals could make sure that the killer, does not get his trial in a timely manner, by then allowing the courts to throw the case out. Is what the Liberals are also saying (under their breath) similar to, “Oh, by the way we Liberals are working on legislation saying that SNC Lavalin can arrange to kill any number of people (preferably Conservatives) that get in their way, (to be non-discriminatory the Liberals would have to include anybody that donates a large amount of money to the Liberal Party,)” so we have to be nice to them? Would the Liberals at the same time include any member of the Liberal party or Member of Parliament the same privilege? I guess this confirms the corruptness of the Liberals in Canada.
When the government is in session, is it alright to ask the Prime Minister if he would back the SNC group should they be charged with murder, as that is what there is an appearance the Liberals would do? Why would the stop at bribery and not murder?
I can see that everyone with smarts will be sure to record any conversations with any member of the Liberal party, to insure that they can back up what is said. Just ask Just-in if he should have had conversations with Mr. Michael Wernick after the phone call Michael made with Jody. Having said this, are we stupid enough to believe that Just-in’s announcement March 29th, 2019, saying he did not know about the conversation between Michael and Jodi, until that same date? Why would Just-in still want to pursue the issue, knowing that Michael was warned by Jodi that Michael and the rest of the Liberals were nearing a conflict of interest situation. When Jodi says to the effect, “somebody is not telling Justin that they are out of order.” What would that mean to people with any integrity at all? Michael says that Mr. Trudeau has his mind made up and will get his way, no matter what you say will become of the file.
I guess that when Canadians realize that the Liberals are special people in government and are allowed to do near anything they want, we should expect that corruption is the way that the Liberals do business, get used to it. Nothing new here to see, move on.
What I have in the back of my mind is that the Liberals are saying to SNC, do anything that you want, and we will forgive you by making sure that you do not get penalized. The change in the Legislation last fall made it apparent that is what the intent is, and not what the Liberals are saying, other countries do this, so we should follow suit. Are the Liberals saying, it will be OK for SNC to kill people who do not agree with them, and the Liberals will get you off? I see that the Liberals could make sure that the killer, does not get his trial in a timely manner, by then allowing the courts to throw the case out. Is what the Liberals are also saying (under their breath) similar to, “Oh, by the way we Liberals are working on legislation saying that SNC Lavalin can arrange to kill any number of people (preferably Conservatives) that get in their way, (to be non-discriminatory the Liberals would have to include anybody that donates a large amount of money to the Liberal Party,)” so we have to be nice to them? Would the Liberals at the same time include any member of the Liberal party or Member of Parliament the same privilege? I guess this confirms the corruptness of the Liberals in Canada.
When the government is in session, is it alright to ask the Prime Minister if he would back the SNC group should they be charged with murder, as that is what there is an appearance the Liberals would do? Why would the stop at bribery and not murder?
I can see that everyone with smarts will be sure to record any conversations with any member of the Liberal party, to insure that they can back up what is said. Just ask Just-in if he should have had conversations with Mr. Michael Wernick after the phone call Michael made with Jody. Having said this, are we stupid enough to believe that Just-in’s announcement March 29th, 2019, saying he did not know about the conversation between Michael and Jodi, until that same date? Why would Just-in still want to pursue the issue, knowing that Michael was warned by Jodi that Michael and the rest of the Liberals were nearing a conflict of interest situation. When Jodi says to the effect, “somebody is not telling Justin that they are out of order.” What would that mean to people with any integrity at all? Michael says that Mr. Trudeau has his mind made up and will get his way, no matter what you say will become of the file.
I guess that when Canadians realize that the Liberals are special people in government and are allowed to do near anything they want, we should expect that corruption is the way that the Liberals do business, get used to it. Nothing new here to see, move on.
