To IMPEACH ????

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,845
2,729
113
New Brunswick
What blinders? I already acknowledged that there's a certain amount of everything you've mentioned. You are just a friggin' control freak. I've told you what I've seen and experienced over many years with many people so put a friggin' lid on it. Just stand by the cash register in the grocery stores for an hour and observe the shit going through.


So you're acknowledging that you are clueless to the real world/reality?


Not a control freak, I'm just making certain that what you said before you admit to being mistaken about and in reality there are many people who live paycheck to paycheck, who barely make enough to live, etc. since you were so adamant people don't do that anymore. I don't want to be accused of taking what you said wrong, after all.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Wow you really are full of crap today aren't you? ...Ummm...Speaking of scandal:

BOMBSHELL! FBI DIR. WRAY ASSISTED SHIFTY OBTAIN GIULIANI/NUNES CALL LOGS VIA NAT. SECURITY CHANNELS!

Black Conservative Patriot

Trumphaters actually proving they are guilty of far worse than what they have never proven about Trump.

...lol then of course there is the known pedo mueller man who donated all that ILLEGAL money to Hitlary's campaign.


JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
Russia probe witness charged with funneling millions to Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign
George Nader was charged earlier this year with child trafficking and transporting child pornography

...was one of seven people named in an indictment unsealed in Washington, D.C...

The indictment alleges that Nader was reporting to a middle eastern government throughout the period.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...ling-millions-hillary-clinton-s-2016-n1096221

LOL, pedo trumphaters - there sure are a lot of you working for foreign governments.
 
Last edited:

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,887
126
63
All prog shit.
The Atlantic article is about stuff from before he was POTUS.
The Bloomberg article is all ad hominem shit, much from before 2017.
Thought Co. is complete crap.
NYT is all about Mueller before he reported.
The Nation piece is all about the unsubstantiated Ukraine shit.

What a poor list of non scandals.
 
Last edited:

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,845
2,729
113
New Brunswick
A bunch of politically motivated unproven accusations.instead of taking care of the nations business the democrats are busy fighting the last election which they refuse to believe they lost after rigging the vote counting. That about sum it up?


So what about the 250 plus bills that have passed the house - some of them with the support of both parties - that now sit languishing in the Senate because "The Grim Reaper" won't do diddley squat with what's waiting for them? Why do the dems get the blame for 'not taking care of the nation's business' when it's Mitch McConnell not doing HIS job?
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
A bunch of politically motivated unproven accusations.instead of taking care of the nations business the democrats are busy fighting the last election which they refuse to believe they lost after rigging the vote counting. That about sum it up?
That is pretty much what Trump would say. in order to divert from what he has done and created by and for himself. He is a master at deflecting , denying, and blaming ........even if it is on a very fundamental & immature level.

The nations work goes on......... and yes......the Dems CAN impeach and chew gum at the same time. ;-)

and yes....there are grounds to impeach........but Trumps tight control over the senate will prevent any disciplinary decisions. What Trump has done is make the swamp even swampier.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
So what about the 250 plus bills that have passed the house - some of them with the support of both parties - that now sit languishing in the Senate because "The Grim Reaper" won't do diddley squat with what's waiting for them? Why do the dems get the blame for 'not taking care of the nation's business' when it's Mitch McConnell not doing HIS job?
The Trumpian Senate is obstructing .............and that seems to include the "nations work" s well. they are too busy protecting Trump. They have lost sight of what they are there for. and to what they should be loyal to. ...........the voters that got them in , the constitution , and the nation of america. They have kissed the ring of their "god father"..........and history will not look kindly on them.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
So you're acknowledging that you are clueless to the real world/reality?


Not a control freak, I'm just making certain that what you said before you admit to being mistaken about and in reality there are many people who live paycheck to paycheck, who barely make enough to live, etc. since you were so adamant people don't do that anymore. I don't want to be accused of taking what you said wrong, after all.


Where did I say there aren't people who are living pay cheque to pay cheque? You should stop putting words in people's mouths. Where did I admit to being clueless to the real world/reality? I think that description fits you closer than me. Where do you think I've been for 76 years? Hiding under a rock? You ARE a control freak!
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,845
2,729
113
New Brunswick
Where did I say there aren't people who are living pay cheque to pay cheque? You should stop putting words in people's mouths. Where did I admit to being clueless to the real world/reality? I think that description fits you closer than me. Where do you think I've been for 76 years? Hiding under a rock? You ARE a control freak!



Really?


Again.


Very few people work JUST to live anymore.


That's what YOU said, your EXACT quote.


Very few people work just to live.


Now you're saying the opposite, that there are people who DO work to live/live paycheck to paycheck?


You said
"Very few people work JUST to live anymore. Just to live" means food, clothes, shelter and hydro.


I continually brought up that while you're right people do have more today than they used to, you kept insisting that most people don't live in a paycheck to paycheck situation. I am saying more people live like that than you obviously realize.


I'm not putting words in your mouth, I'm going off of what YOU said.


I'm the one that said you were clueless, BECAUSE you don't realize that more people live paycheck to paycheck, that more people are working just to live than you think.


I think if you're 76, you stopped looking at the world at some point because it was changing too much for you to handle and now you're assuming things because the place where you live has people who are getting by really well and think it must be so all over, when it's not that way at all.


Again, not control, just trying to be sure you actually were saying what it sounded like.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Really?


Again.





That's what YOU said, your EXACT quote.


Very few people work just to live.


Now you're saying the opposite, that there are people who DO work to live/live paycheck to paycheck?


You said


I continually brought up that while you're right people do have more today than they used to, you kept insisting that most people don't live in a paycheck to paycheck situation. I am saying more people live like that than you obviously realize.


I'm not putting words in your mouth, I'm going off of what YOU said.


I'm the one that said you were clueless, BECAUSE you don't realize that more people live paycheck to paycheck, that more people are working just to live than you think.


I think if you're 76, you stopped looking at the world at some point because it was changing too much for you to handle and now you're assuming things because the place where you live has people who are getting by really well and think it must be so all over, when it's not that way at all.


Again, not control, just trying to be sure you actually were saying what it sounded like.


I don't know how else to explain it. There are people included in the whole gamut...………….millionaires, C.E.O. earning $1/2 a million a year, professionals earning $1/4 million a year, tradesmen earning up to $100,000 a year, normal workers earning $40,000 a year, drudges earing $12,000 a year and no doubt some with an income of less than $5000 a year. As I've pointed out some of the ones who are "just existing" are actually existing at a fairly high standard as I went into at length. I can't put it any easier for you to understand than that. I've covered pretty well every income level, so I'm not sure what you have to argue about. :)
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,506
8,108
113
B.C.
Around here, 4-500 will get you a bachelor type apartment in a run down house.


That 6-7 is a one room in an okay building.


800 will get you a better apartment or it can be the start of a mortgage.


1000 is slowly getting to be the norm for base apartments of good condition here.


Sadly this is also a retiree town and a town with quite a few well off people, and the newer apartment buildings cater to them and not lower income single people, or seniors on a low set income.
Duh , they cater to the people with money . Who doesn’t?
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,506
8,108
113
B.C.
A bunch of politically motivated unproven accusations.instead of taking care of the nations business the democrats are busy fighting the last election which they refuse to believe they lost after rigging the vote counting. That about sum it up?
And the most qualified candidate ever .
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,845
2,729
113
New Brunswick
I don't know how else to explain it. There are people included in the whole gamut...………….millionaires, C.E.O. earning $1/2 a million a year, professionals earning $1/4 million a year, tradesmen earning up to $100,000 a year, normal workers earning $40,000 a year, drudges earing $12,000 a year and no doubt some with an income of less than $5000 a year. As I've pointed out some of the ones who are "just existing" are actually existing at a fairly high standard as I went into at length. I can't put it any easier for you to understand than that. I've covered pretty well every income level, so I'm not sure what you have to argue about. :)


... except you missed the point entirely.


Okay, that's fine.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,506
8,108
113
B.C.
The Trumpian Senate is obstructing .............and that seems to include the "nations work" s well. they are too busy protecting Trump. They have lost sight of what they are there for. and to what they should be loyal to. ...........the voters that got them in , the constitution , and the nation of america. They have kissed the ring of their "god father"..........and history will not look kindly on them.
How can the Senate be obstructing , when articles have not been presented to them ? Are you projecting ? Are you panicking? Four more years . MAGA .