To IMPEACH ????

Walter

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,887
126
63
Cliffy said:
Click to expand...


Typical prog bullying.
 
Serryah

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,845
2,729
113
New Brunswick
Dixie Cup said:
Perhaps you can quote the area of law that states "intimidation" is illegal and I would hope that the law would also have to define exactly what is considered "intimidation" especially now-a-days.


Since being "offended" seems to be the thing now (and has lost most of its meaning) and some people are easily "offended" I would love to know what your interpretation of being "intimidated" would be. I would bet what I've written here would be considered intimidating or at the very least, "offensive".


Nothing Trump has said recently was intimidating - annoying yes, intimidating no. He's full of bluster (not that I blame him since he's being attacked from all sides) but he's certainly not intimidating, you have to admit that at least.


If anyone should be intimidated or worried it's the supporters of Clintons- look how many of them have died - mysteriously?? Hmmm, maybe that's the reason why no one wants to investigate them - people end up dead! Hey - new conspiracy theory (or not). LOL


Ah, politics - gotta love 'em!


JMHO
Click to expand...


I posted a link where it gives the answer you've requested.


I did my part of the job; you do yours.


And WTF is it with the Clintons? Clintons have nothing to do with Trump breaking the law.


Like FFS... and you complain about people going on about Trump?



And don't mistake me for a Clinton supporter, I'm not. I think she was a fukin idiot to run to begin with and I don't like her or her policies or her attitude even. There's a shitton of baggage with her there.


That said, I STILL think she'd be miles better than Trump in the end but that's JMHO.
 
Tecumsehsbones

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,150
9,431
113
Washington DC
Dixie Cup said:
Perhaps you can quote the area of law that states "intimidation" is illegal and I would hope that the law would also have to define exactly what is considered "intimidation" especially now-a-days.
Since being "offended" seems to be the thing now (and has lost most of its meaning) and some people are easily "offended" I would love to know what your interpretation of being "intimidated" would be. I would bet what I've written here would be considered intimidating or at the very least, "offensive".
Nothing Trump has said recently was intimidating - annoying yes, intimidating no. He's full of bluster (not that I blame him since he's being attacked from all sides) but he's certainly not intimidating, you have to admit that at least.
If anyone should be intimidated or worried it's the supporters of Clintons- look how many of them have died - mysteriously?? Hmmm, maybe that's the reason why no one wants to investigate them - people end up dead! Hey - new conspiracy theory (or not). LOL
Ah, politics - gotta love 'em!
JMHO
Click to expand...
18 USC 1512(b).
 
JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Dixie Cup said:
Perhaps you can quote the area of law that states "intimidation" is illegal and I would hope that the law would also have to define exactly what is considered "intimidation" especially now-a-days.




JMHO
Click to expand...


Little B.S. there! Who decides whether a person has been intimidated or not? Some people just love to play that card!
 
JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Cannuck said:
I love how Trumpites can’t help responding to me, if only to say something idiotic and pointless
Click to expand...


THAT surprises no one! You're too f**king stupid to understand that we are all laughing at you and mocking you. You're an idiot!
 
Ocean Breeze

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,397
94
48
Cannuck said:
Courts?
Click to expand...
intimidation is an aggressive act/ threat. Intimidation is demeaning.........and engenders fear.

The behavior is obvious..... be it verbal or physical.

Trump's nasty name calling is a form of intimation. He uses many forms........as he is a very angry man.........who blames others for consequence he creates himself. On a primal level he is a petulant angry spoilt child.

His so called request of the Ukrainian leader was also a form of intimidation.......... accompanied by extortion. Mind you THAT is how he "negotiates"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom