To IMPEACH ????

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
..and now for the real news:

State Dept docs connect Clinton & Nuland to Steele, Ukraine & Libya (Video)


The Duran
96.9K subscribers

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 372.

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss documents uncovered by Judicial Watch, which reveal a long and extensive relationship between fake Russiagate dossier author Christopher Steele and top Obama State Department officials, including the architects of the Libya and Ukraine regime change operations.

Poor cliffy. I guess I would be mean nasty and fakenews too if a-hole flock of swallows were digging holes and nesting in my forehead.
 
Last edited:

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
those are not straws........they are facts......and the facts are building up into a pattern of conduct........that is impeachable. The R's are defending the indefensible. The information coming from the witnesses is consistent. and is confirming the Whistle blowers concerns.
The FACT remains is that Trump is the worst thing that has happened to the world.......not just the US.
But it seems that the economy has to crash before the trumpians will see the man for what he is.........maybe. They measure everything by the economy.........

They are still trying to throw sh*t against the wall to see what they can get public support on impeachment, to shield the 30 or so in the house. When you commission a poll to see which term is worse and bribery wins tells me they are still looking for evidence for a predetermined outcome.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,501
8,106
113
B.C.
They are still trying to throw sh*t against the wall to see what they can get public support on impeachment, to shield the 30 or so in the house. When you commission a poll to see which term is worse and bribery wins tells me they are still looking for evidence for a predetermined outcome.
Of course , they no he can’t be beaten in the general election with the clowns presently seeking the nomination. There only chance is to try and force his resignation ala Nixon .
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,283
4,000
113
Edmonton
Sweetie, the U.S. doesn't have a Liberal Party, and the rest of your post is a bunch of lies you sucked up from far-right liars and are now regurgitating without knowing what you're talking about.

So. . . pretty much par for the course.



And you, of course, know everything LOL You are too funny! Speaking of "lapping, sucking, regurgitating" Nothing about what I said was a lie, but of course, you know that already - just refuse to acknowledge it. Sigh....


Continue with head in sand - butt in the air looks good LOL
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,283
4,000
113
Edmonton
If you're a racist how could you not be a fanatical follower of Trump?

When are you ever going to get another chance like this?



And of course, the "name calling" continues. Surely you can come up with a better statement than that! Sigh... seems to me the term
"racist" just doesn't "do it" for me any more. Mind you, having never been racist, I don't know what it would have been like, but the term is losing it's meaning rather quickly simply because of misuse. Shame on you!!
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,283
4,000
113
Edmonton
Not so nebulous if you read what the law says.


Not that I expected you too. :smile:



Perhaps you can quote the area of law that states "intimidation" is illegal and I would hope that the law would also have to define exactly what is considered "intimidation" especially now-a-days.


Since being "offended" seems to be the thing now (and has lost most of its meaning) and some people are easily "offended" I would love to know what your interpretation of being "intimidated" would be. I would bet what I've written here would be considered intimidating or at the very least, "offensive".


Nothing Trump has said recently was intimidating - annoying yes, intimidating no. He's full of bluster (not that I blame him since he's being attacked from all sides) but he's certainly not intimidating, you have to admit that at least.


If anyone should be intimidated or worried it's the supporters of Clintons- look how many of them have died - mysteriously?? Hmmm, maybe that's the reason why no one wants to investigate them - people end up dead! Hey - new conspiracy theory (or not). LOL


Ah, politics - gotta love 'em!


JMHO
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Perhaps you can quote the area of law that states "intimidation" is illegal and I would hope that the law would also have to define exactly what is considered "intimidation" especially now-a-days.


Since being "offended" seems to be the thing now (and has lost most of its meaning) and some people are easily "offended" I would love to know what your interpretation of being "intimidated" would be. I would bet what I've written here would be considered intimidating or at the very least, "offensive".


Nothing Trump has said recently was intimidating - annoying yes, intimidating no. He's full of bluster (not that I blame him since he's being attacked from all sides) but he's certainly not intimidating, you have to admit that at least.


If anyone should be intimidated or worried it's the supporters of Clintons- look how many of them have died - mysteriously?? Hmmm, maybe that's the reason why no one wants to investigate them - people end up dead! Hey - new conspiracy theory (or not). LOL


Ah, politics - gotta love 'em!


JMHO


You have it right Dixie, ignore the Snowflakes!
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,201
14,247
113
Low Earth Orbit
Its not about impeachment. Dems fear losing again in 2020 so they keep trying everything and anything to avoid another loss.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Its not about impeachment. Dems fear losing again in 2020 so they keep trying everything and anything to avoid another loss.
The World fears the rise of authoritarian criminal thugs except for a few of you who come from cultures that have produced so many of them that you think Trump is a "right kind of guy".